{"title":"FEMINIST AUTOTHANATOGRAPHIES: ALICE JAMES AND SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR","authors":"V. Vevere","doi":"10.32008/nordsci2019/b1/v2/34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminist autobiography is a genre with long-standing literary and philosophical tradition, still some aspects, like, autobiography as “death writing” have come to scholarly attention as of relatively recent. The conceptual framework hinged on the concepts of “tanatography” (defined as an account of a person’s death) and “autotanatography” (defined as an account of one’s own death) makes it possible to take a fresh look into feminist writings from 19th and 20th centuries (Alice James and Simone de Beauvoir). Among the questions for the critical reflection we can mention the following ones: issues of memory and forgetting, of death of the significant other, of aging, of suicide, of literary death (ending the writing career path). Autothanatography is self-death-writing, instead of self-life-writing, even if death is an experience that cannot be had for oneself. The current article takes a look into the auto-death-writing of two women writers: Alice James (1848-1892) – a sister of William and Henry James and Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986). Although both women’s lives are set almost a century apart and none of them define herself as a feminist writer, their memoirs are written from the vantage point of imminent death. In the first case (James’s) we can speak of her posthumously published diaries, especially their second part written after she was diagnosed with breast cancer. Whereas in the latter (Beauvoir’s) case the autothanatological vibe is felt throughout the whole series of her memoirs (“Memoirs of a dutiful daughter”, “The prime of life”, “Force of circumstance”, “A very easy death”), but especially in the oeuvre “All is said and done” – the writing in anticipation of one’s death. The aspect that is common to both writers is that their memoirs exhibit the strategy of recollection, of re-reading their life events anew in the wake of the end (physical and/or authorial).","PeriodicalId":146100,"journal":{"name":"NORDSCI International Conference Proceedings Education and Language edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NORDSCI International Conference Proceedings Education and Language edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32008/nordsci2019/b1/v2/34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

女权主义自传是一种具有悠久文学和哲学传统的体裁,但有些方面,比如,自传作为“死亡写作”,最近才引起学术界的关注。“tanatography”(定义为对一个人死亡的描述)和“autotanatography”(定义为对自己死亡的描述)这两个概念的概念框架,使人们有可能重新审视19世纪和20世纪的女权主义作品(爱丽丝·詹姆斯和西蒙娜·德·波伏娃)。在批判性反思的问题中,我们可以提到以下几个问题:记忆和遗忘,重要他人的死亡,衰老,自杀,文学死亡(结束写作生涯)的问题。即使死亡是一种自己无法拥有的经历,但自动死亡是一种自我死亡的写作,而不是自我生命的写作。本文将探讨两位女作家的自动死亡写作:爱丽丝·詹姆斯(1848-1892)——威廉和亨利·詹姆斯的妹妹,西蒙娜·德·波伏娃(1908-1986)。尽管这两位女性的生活相隔近一个世纪,她们都没有将自己定义为女权主义作家,但她们的回忆录都是从即将死亡的有利位置写的。在第一种情况下(詹姆斯的),我们可以谈论她死后出版的日记,尤其是她被诊断出患有乳腺癌后写的第二部分。而在波伏娃的作品中,她的整个回忆录系列(《一个孝顺的女儿的回忆录》、《青春年华》、《环境的力量》、《轻而易举的死亡》)中都能感受到自我死亡的气息,尤其是在她的全部作品《一切都说了,一切都做了》中——在对死亡的预期中写作。两位作家的共同之处在于,他们的回忆录都表现出一种回忆的策略,即在结束后重新阅读他们的生活事件(现实的和/或作者的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FEMINIST AUTOTHANATOGRAPHIES: ALICE JAMES AND SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR
Feminist autobiography is a genre with long-standing literary and philosophical tradition, still some aspects, like, autobiography as “death writing” have come to scholarly attention as of relatively recent. The conceptual framework hinged on the concepts of “tanatography” (defined as an account of a person’s death) and “autotanatography” (defined as an account of one’s own death) makes it possible to take a fresh look into feminist writings from 19th and 20th centuries (Alice James and Simone de Beauvoir). Among the questions for the critical reflection we can mention the following ones: issues of memory and forgetting, of death of the significant other, of aging, of suicide, of literary death (ending the writing career path). Autothanatography is self-death-writing, instead of self-life-writing, even if death is an experience that cannot be had for oneself. The current article takes a look into the auto-death-writing of two women writers: Alice James (1848-1892) – a sister of William and Henry James and Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986). Although both women’s lives are set almost a century apart and none of them define herself as a feminist writer, their memoirs are written from the vantage point of imminent death. In the first case (James’s) we can speak of her posthumously published diaries, especially their second part written after she was diagnosed with breast cancer. Whereas in the latter (Beauvoir’s) case the autothanatological vibe is felt throughout the whole series of her memoirs (“Memoirs of a dutiful daughter”, “The prime of life”, “Force of circumstance”, “A very easy death”), but especially in the oeuvre “All is said and done” – the writing in anticipation of one’s death. The aspect that is common to both writers is that their memoirs exhibit the strategy of recollection, of re-reading their life events anew in the wake of the end (physical and/or authorial).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BLENDING MOOC AND ON-CAMPUS LSP COURSE CULTURAL AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AMONG ASIAN STUDENTS IN RUSSIA AN OUTLINE OF NOUN MORPHOLOGY IN SURGUT AND SALYM KHANTY USING HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES AS PREVENTION OF SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN OLD AGE INNOVATIVE METHODS OF EDUCATION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LANGUAGE SKILLS 
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1