更新了虚拟机和Linux容器的性能比较

Wes Felter, Alexandre Ferreira, R. Rajamony, J. Rubio
{"title":"更新了虚拟机和Linux容器的性能比较","authors":"Wes Felter, Alexandre Ferreira, R. Rajamony, J. Rubio","doi":"10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud computing makes extensive use of virtual machines because they permit workloads to be isolated from one another and for the resource usage to be somewhat controlled. In this paper, we explore the performance of traditional virtual machine (VM) deployments, and contrast them with the use of Linux containers. We use KVM as a representative hypervisor and Docker as a container manager. Our results show that containers result in equal or better performance than VMs in almost all cases. Both VMs and containers require tuning to support I/Ointensive applications. We also discuss the implications of our performance results for future cloud architectures.","PeriodicalId":189378,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1084","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An updated performance comparison of virtual machines and Linux containers\",\"authors\":\"Wes Felter, Alexandre Ferreira, R. Rajamony, J. Rubio\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cloud computing makes extensive use of virtual machines because they permit workloads to be isolated from one another and for the resource usage to be somewhat controlled. In this paper, we explore the performance of traditional virtual machine (VM) deployments, and contrast them with the use of Linux containers. We use KVM as a representative hypervisor and Docker as a container manager. Our results show that containers result in equal or better performance than VMs in almost all cases. Both VMs and containers require tuning to support I/Ointensive applications. We also discuss the implications of our performance results for future cloud architectures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1084\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1084

摘要

云计算广泛使用虚拟机,因为它们允许将工作负载相互隔离,并在一定程度上控制资源使用。在本文中,我们探讨了传统虚拟机(VM)部署的性能,并将它们与Linux容器的使用进行了对比。我们使用KVM作为典型的管理程序,使用Docker作为容器管理器。我们的结果表明,在几乎所有情况下,容器的性能都与vm相当甚至更好。vm和容器都需要调优以支持I/ o密集型应用程序。我们还讨论了性能结果对未来云架构的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An updated performance comparison of virtual machines and Linux containers
Cloud computing makes extensive use of virtual machines because they permit workloads to be isolated from one another and for the resource usage to be somewhat controlled. In this paper, we explore the performance of traditional virtual machine (VM) deployments, and contrast them with the use of Linux containers. We use KVM as a representative hypervisor and Docker as a container manager. Our results show that containers result in equal or better performance than VMs in almost all cases. Both VMs and containers require tuning to support I/Ointensive applications. We also discuss the implications of our performance results for future cloud architectures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Graph Processing Platforms at Scale: Practices and Experiences Self-monitoring overhead of the Linux perf_ event performance counter interface Analyzing communication models for distributed thread-collaborative processors in terms of energy and time A full-system approach to analyze the impact of next-generation mobile flash storage Graph-matching-based simulation-region selection for multiple binaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1