电子商务公司的企业社会责任研究

M. Groh
{"title":"电子商务公司的企业社会责任研究","authors":"M. Groh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2875603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the following article, the theory of knowledge management (TKM) is described as the systematisation of an organisation’s practices to facilitate consistent service and product delivery across divisions and regions. Organisation theory is approached from the postmodern perspective and expressed as comprising five separate elements: organisational activism, workplace humanism, societal context, multiple disciplines, and the value given to historical knowledge. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is addressed in its importance as a popular project for organisations, however, studies show that CSR does not present long-term value for most firms. Chia’s (1996) consideration of being-realism in organisational theory is evaluated, questioning the rationality of depicting strategies and goals with physicality in order to compare them. Mills, Boylstein, & Lorean (2001) provide an argument for a society heavily influenced by technology which causes individuals to feel a deep sense of impending doom, which is examined against related studies. Finally, Newton’s (1996) comparison of postmodernist theory, organisational theory, and feminist study within the context of actions in the postmodernist movement, is reviewed. The article concludes by critiquing postmodernist applications of organisational theory and their applicability when faced with real-world constraining elements, such as physical risks and time factors. It is suggested that this uneven transition outside of academics makes creating a functional organisational CSR model for ecommerce corporations impractical in long-range planning.","PeriodicalId":210981,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essay on Corporate Social Responsibility in eCommerce Companies\",\"authors\":\"M. Groh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2875603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the following article, the theory of knowledge management (TKM) is described as the systematisation of an organisation’s practices to facilitate consistent service and product delivery across divisions and regions. Organisation theory is approached from the postmodern perspective and expressed as comprising five separate elements: organisational activism, workplace humanism, societal context, multiple disciplines, and the value given to historical knowledge. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is addressed in its importance as a popular project for organisations, however, studies show that CSR does not present long-term value for most firms. Chia’s (1996) consideration of being-realism in organisational theory is evaluated, questioning the rationality of depicting strategies and goals with physicality in order to compare them. Mills, Boylstein, & Lorean (2001) provide an argument for a society heavily influenced by technology which causes individuals to feel a deep sense of impending doom, which is examined against related studies. Finally, Newton’s (1996) comparison of postmodernist theory, organisational theory, and feminist study within the context of actions in the postmodernist movement, is reviewed. The article concludes by critiquing postmodernist applications of organisational theory and their applicability when faced with real-world constraining elements, such as physical risks and time factors. It is suggested that this uneven transition outside of academics makes creating a functional organisational CSR model for ecommerce corporations impractical in long-range planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2875603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2875603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在下面的文章中,知识管理理论(TKM)被描述为组织实践的系统化,以促进跨部门和地区一致的服务和产品交付。组织理论是从后现代的角度出发的,并被表达为包括五个独立的要素:组织行动主义、工作场所人文主义、社会背景、多学科和赋予历史知识的价值。企业社会责任(CSR)作为一个受欢迎的组织项目的重要性得到了解决,然而,研究表明,企业社会责任对大多数公司来说并不具有长期价值。本文评价了Chia(1996)在组织理论中对存在-现实主义的考虑,质疑用物质性描述策略和目标的合理性,以便对它们进行比较。Mills, Boylstein, & Lorean(2001)为一个受技术严重影响的社会提供了一个论点,这使得个人感到一种深刻的即将到来的厄运感,这是对相关研究的检验。最后,回顾了牛顿(1996)在后现代主义运动的行动背景下对后现代主义理论、组织理论和女权主义研究的比较。文章最后批评了组织理论的后现代主义应用及其在面对现实世界的约束因素时的适用性,如物理风险和时间因素。有人认为,学术界之外的这种不平衡过渡,使得为电子商务公司创建一个功能性组织CSR模型在长期规划中不切实际。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Essay on Corporate Social Responsibility in eCommerce Companies
In the following article, the theory of knowledge management (TKM) is described as the systematisation of an organisation’s practices to facilitate consistent service and product delivery across divisions and regions. Organisation theory is approached from the postmodern perspective and expressed as comprising five separate elements: organisational activism, workplace humanism, societal context, multiple disciplines, and the value given to historical knowledge. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is addressed in its importance as a popular project for organisations, however, studies show that CSR does not present long-term value for most firms. Chia’s (1996) consideration of being-realism in organisational theory is evaluated, questioning the rationality of depicting strategies and goals with physicality in order to compare them. Mills, Boylstein, & Lorean (2001) provide an argument for a society heavily influenced by technology which causes individuals to feel a deep sense of impending doom, which is examined against related studies. Finally, Newton’s (1996) comparison of postmodernist theory, organisational theory, and feminist study within the context of actions in the postmodernist movement, is reviewed. The article concludes by critiquing postmodernist applications of organisational theory and their applicability when faced with real-world constraining elements, such as physical risks and time factors. It is suggested that this uneven transition outside of academics makes creating a functional organisational CSR model for ecommerce corporations impractical in long-range planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CEO Pay Ratio Estimation under Social Pressure Strategic Leadership in Corporate Social Responsibility Does CSR Engender Trust? Evidence From Investor Reactions to Corporate Disclosures Tax Planning Knowledge Diffusion via the Labor Market Corporate Flexibility in a Time of Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1