多元化与资优教育

F. Worrell, Dante D. Dixson
{"title":"多元化与资优教育","authors":"F. Worrell, Dante D. Dixson","doi":"10.4324/9781003233961-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of diversity in gifted and talented programs has been a major concern in the\n extant literature, and as the population of the United States grows more diverse,\n ways to increase the diversity of the students classified as gifted and talented will\n likely continue to be a central focus of educators and researchers in the field\n (e.g., Lamb, 2019). Early work in this\n area was concentrated on subgroup differences on intelligence test scores, as these\n tests are frequently used as part of the identification procedure for gifted\n programs, and students from some ethnic and racial subgroups obtain lower scores on\n these tests on average. More recent research has focused on (a) documenting the\n extent of underrepresentation of various racial and ethnic groups in gifted programs,\n (b) proposing alternative identification mechanisms for increasing the numbers of\n ethnically diverse students in gifted programs, and (c) changing the education system\n so that all students, but especially students from underrepresented groups, receive a\n quality education to mitigate the disparities on criteria for classification as a\n gifted student.","PeriodicalId":285734,"journal":{"name":"Critical Issues and Practices in Gifted Education","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity and Gifted\\n Education\",\"authors\":\"F. Worrell, Dante D. Dixson\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003233961-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lack of diversity in gifted and talented programs has been a major concern in the\\n extant literature, and as the population of the United States grows more diverse,\\n ways to increase the diversity of the students classified as gifted and talented will\\n likely continue to be a central focus of educators and researchers in the field\\n (e.g., Lamb, 2019). Early work in this\\n area was concentrated on subgroup differences on intelligence test scores, as these\\n tests are frequently used as part of the identification procedure for gifted\\n programs, and students from some ethnic and racial subgroups obtain lower scores on\\n these tests on average. More recent research has focused on (a) documenting the\\n extent of underrepresentation of various racial and ethnic groups in gifted programs,\\n (b) proposing alternative identification mechanisms for increasing the numbers of\\n ethnically diverse students in gifted programs, and (c) changing the education system\\n so that all students, but especially students from underrepresented groups, receive a\\n quality education to mitigate the disparities on criteria for classification as a\\n gifted student.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Issues and Practices in Gifted Education\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Issues and Practices in Gifted Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003233961-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Issues and Practices in Gifted Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003233961-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

资优和人才项目缺乏多样性一直是现有文献中的一个主要问题,随着美国人口越来越多样化,增加被归类为资优和人才的学生多样性的方法可能会继续成为该领域教育工作者和研究人员的中心焦点(例如,Lamb, 2019)。这一领域的早期工作集中在智力测试分数的亚组差异上,因为这些测试经常被用作天才项目识别过程的一部分,而来自某些民族和种族亚组的学生在这些测试中的平均得分较低。最近的研究集中在(a)记录不同种族和民族在资优项目中代表性不足的程度,(b)提出其他识别机制,以增加资优项目中不同种族学生的数量,以及(c)改变教育系统,使所有学生,特别是来自代表性不足群体的学生,接受优质教育,以减轻资优学生分类标准的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diversity and Gifted Education
The lack of diversity in gifted and talented programs has been a major concern in the extant literature, and as the population of the United States grows more diverse, ways to increase the diversity of the students classified as gifted and talented will likely continue to be a central focus of educators and researchers in the field (e.g., Lamb, 2019). Early work in this area was concentrated on subgroup differences on intelligence test scores, as these tests are frequently used as part of the identification procedure for gifted programs, and students from some ethnic and racial subgroups obtain lower scores on these tests on average. More recent research has focused on (a) documenting the extent of underrepresentation of various racial and ethnic groups in gifted programs, (b) proposing alternative identification mechanisms for increasing the numbers of ethnically diverse students in gifted programs, and (c) changing the education system so that all students, but especially students from underrepresented groups, receive a quality education to mitigate the disparities on criteria for classification as a gifted student.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Science Education for Gifted Students Thinking and Learning Styles Career Decisions and Development College Students Legal Issues and Gifted Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1