6王族宫廷中的进行曲,1400-1750

D. Raeymaekers, S. Derks
{"title":"6王族宫廷中的进行曲,1400-1750","authors":"D. Raeymaekers, S. Derks","doi":"10.1163/9789004291966_007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past four decades, the accessibility of those in power has become an important topic in historiography, particularly at the pre-modern court. Whereas most specialists of late medieval and early modern politics tend to agree that the study of access is the key to understanding power relations in these periods, opinions seem to differ as to exactly how the concept should be approached. For want of a clear definition, access has remained a rather vague category, the importance of which is often assumed rather than thoroughly explained. Similarly, the association between access and power is usually taken for granted, whereas the mechanisms behind it remain obscure. Scholars still struggle to understand how access was used by subjects to represent their claims in premodern centres of power, and the ways in which it was articulated and performed. By taking the full complexity of proximity to the monarch into account, this chapter means to broaden the scope and to explore how the many varieties of access enabled medieval and early modern people to express their voices and concerns.","PeriodicalId":432812,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Power and Political Representation from Ancient History to the Present Day","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"6 Repertoires of Access in Princely Courts, 1400-1750\",\"authors\":\"D. Raeymaekers, S. Derks\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004291966_007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past four decades, the accessibility of those in power has become an important topic in historiography, particularly at the pre-modern court. Whereas most specialists of late medieval and early modern politics tend to agree that the study of access is the key to understanding power relations in these periods, opinions seem to differ as to exactly how the concept should be approached. For want of a clear definition, access has remained a rather vague category, the importance of which is often assumed rather than thoroughly explained. Similarly, the association between access and power is usually taken for granted, whereas the mechanisms behind it remain obscure. Scholars still struggle to understand how access was used by subjects to represent their claims in premodern centres of power, and the ways in which it was articulated and performed. By taking the full complexity of proximity to the monarch into account, this chapter means to broaden the scope and to explore how the many varieties of access enabled medieval and early modern people to express their voices and concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Perspectives on Power and Political Representation from Ancient History to the Present Day\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Perspectives on Power and Political Representation from Ancient History to the Present Day\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291966_007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives on Power and Political Representation from Ancient History to the Present Day","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291966_007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的四十年里,当权者的可接近性已经成为史学的一个重要话题,特别是在前现代的宫廷中。尽管大多数研究中世纪晚期和近代早期政治的专家都倾向于认为,对获取权的研究是理解这些时期权力关系的关键,但对于如何看待这一概念,人们的看法似乎存在分歧。由于缺乏明确的定义,获取仍然是一个相当模糊的范畴,其重要性往往是假定的,而不是彻底解释的。同样地,人们通常认为接触和权力之间的联系是理所当然的,而其背后的机制却不为人知。学者们仍在努力理解,在前现代的权力中心,臣民是如何利用访问权来表达他们的主张的,以及这种访问权是如何表达和执行的。通过考虑到与君主亲近的全部复杂性,本章旨在拓宽范围,并探索多种多样的接触如何使中世纪和早期现代人表达自己的声音和关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
6 Repertoires of Access in Princely Courts, 1400-1750
In the past four decades, the accessibility of those in power has become an important topic in historiography, particularly at the pre-modern court. Whereas most specialists of late medieval and early modern politics tend to agree that the study of access is the key to understanding power relations in these periods, opinions seem to differ as to exactly how the concept should be approached. For want of a clear definition, access has remained a rather vague category, the importance of which is often assumed rather than thoroughly explained. Similarly, the association between access and power is usually taken for granted, whereas the mechanisms behind it remain obscure. Scholars still struggle to understand how access was used by subjects to represent their claims in premodern centres of power, and the ways in which it was articulated and performed. By taking the full complexity of proximity to the monarch into account, this chapter means to broaden the scope and to explore how the many varieties of access enabled medieval and early modern people to express their voices and concerns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3 Politics of Access at the Court of the Caliph 7 The Image of Prime Minister Colijn: Public Visualisation of Political Leadership in the 1930s 4 Representative Bodies in Medieval Religious Orders: A Discarded Legacy? 9 Majdan: Presence and Political Representation in Post-Communist Ukraine 6 Repertoires of Access in Princely Courts, 1400-1750
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1