结构化与非结构化内容分析在员工意见挖掘中的价值

Gabriel Jipa
{"title":"结构化与非结构化内容分析在员工意见挖掘中的价值","authors":"Gabriel Jipa","doi":"10.5171/2019.908286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employees and their knowledge are critical for a company’s success and were extensively covered by literature. Free form of knowledge, as opinions or feedback is analyzed in some companies in order to understand potential areas of improvement or satisfaction. This research focuses on analyzing free format opinions collected with a survey instrument from 586 employees of a bank. Various techniques as text analytics, word embedding, supervised and unsupervised learning were explored, extracting key concepts or entities. Attribution and relational similarity was explored using techniques as supervised text classification or unsupervised, by word vector representation and embedding using word2vdec. The aim was to explain overall satisfaction combining structured data (collected with closed questions survey, using 7 points Likert scale) enhanced with text classification of opinions, related to best and worst applications, along with explanations. The theoretical model used for ontology and taxonomy of text classification was based on Technology Acceptance Model, mapped into the main perceptual constructs, Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Utility. The scope of research was the banks’ enterprise IT environment, not focused on a specific application. Various quantitative models, including linear models, decision trees and neural nets, were evaluated to capture potential causality of overall employee IT satisfaction level. The results suggest strong influence of perceptual constructs towards satisfaction, within all methods, while unstructured textual data provide additional insights on employees’ perception from concept associations.","PeriodicalId":371132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Administrative Sciences and Technology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Value of Structured and Unstructured Content Analytics of Employees’ Opinion Mining\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Jipa\",\"doi\":\"10.5171/2019.908286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Employees and their knowledge are critical for a company’s success and were extensively covered by literature. Free form of knowledge, as opinions or feedback is analyzed in some companies in order to understand potential areas of improvement or satisfaction. This research focuses on analyzing free format opinions collected with a survey instrument from 586 employees of a bank. Various techniques as text analytics, word embedding, supervised and unsupervised learning were explored, extracting key concepts or entities. Attribution and relational similarity was explored using techniques as supervised text classification or unsupervised, by word vector representation and embedding using word2vdec. The aim was to explain overall satisfaction combining structured data (collected with closed questions survey, using 7 points Likert scale) enhanced with text classification of opinions, related to best and worst applications, along with explanations. The theoretical model used for ontology and taxonomy of text classification was based on Technology Acceptance Model, mapped into the main perceptual constructs, Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Utility. The scope of research was the banks’ enterprise IT environment, not focused on a specific application. Various quantitative models, including linear models, decision trees and neural nets, were evaluated to capture potential causality of overall employee IT satisfaction level. The results suggest strong influence of perceptual constructs towards satisfaction, within all methods, while unstructured textual data provide additional insights on employees’ perception from concept associations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Administrative Sciences and Technology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Administrative Sciences and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5171/2019.908286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Administrative Sciences and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5171/2019.908286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

员工和他们的知识对公司的成功至关重要,并且被文献广泛报道。自由形式的知识,如意见或反馈,在一些公司进行分析,以了解改进或满意的潜在领域。本研究的重点是对某银行586名员工使用问卷调查工具收集的自由格式意见进行分析。研究了文本分析、词嵌入、监督学习和无监督学习等各种技术,以提取关键概念或实体。通过word2vdec的词向量表示和嵌入,使用监督文本分类或非监督文本分类技术探索归因和关系相似性。目的是结合结构化数据(通过封闭式问题调查收集,使用7分李克特量表)和与最佳和最差应用程序相关的文本分类意见以及解释来解释总体满意度。文本分类本体和分类法的理论模型基于技术接受模型,映射为主要的感知结构、感知易用性和感知实用性。研究的范围是银行的企业IT环境,而不是特定的应用程序。我们评估了各种定量模型,包括线性模型、决策树和神经网络,以捕捉总体员工IT满意度的潜在因果关系。结果表明,在所有方法中,感知结构对满意度有很强的影响,而非结构化的文本数据为员工从概念关联中感知提供了额外的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Value of Structured and Unstructured Content Analytics of Employees’ Opinion Mining
Employees and their knowledge are critical for a company’s success and were extensively covered by literature. Free form of knowledge, as opinions or feedback is analyzed in some companies in order to understand potential areas of improvement or satisfaction. This research focuses on analyzing free format opinions collected with a survey instrument from 586 employees of a bank. Various techniques as text analytics, word embedding, supervised and unsupervised learning were explored, extracting key concepts or entities. Attribution and relational similarity was explored using techniques as supervised text classification or unsupervised, by word vector representation and embedding using word2vdec. The aim was to explain overall satisfaction combining structured data (collected with closed questions survey, using 7 points Likert scale) enhanced with text classification of opinions, related to best and worst applications, along with explanations. The theoretical model used for ontology and taxonomy of text classification was based on Technology Acceptance Model, mapped into the main perceptual constructs, Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Utility. The scope of research was the banks’ enterprise IT environment, not focused on a specific application. Various quantitative models, including linear models, decision trees and neural nets, were evaluated to capture potential causality of overall employee IT satisfaction level. The results suggest strong influence of perceptual constructs towards satisfaction, within all methods, while unstructured textual data provide additional insights on employees’ perception from concept associations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Civil Servants’ Career Development: An Inquiry into Romanian Public Administration The Right to Information and Transparency in Administration during the COVID-19- Selected Issues from Poland Calculating Consequences of Road Accidents for Public Administering and Strategic Management of Road Transport The Level of Preparedness and Response of Nonprofit Organizations in A Pandemic Crisis: An Exploratory Qualitative Research Analysis of Abusive 112 Emergency Calls in Romania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1