1064nm,纳秒激光反射薄膜损伤竞赛

Laser Damage Pub Date : 2019-11-20 DOI:10.1117/12.2531861
R. Negres, C. Stolz, Michael D. Thomas, M. Caputo
{"title":"1064nm,纳秒激光反射薄膜损伤竞赛","authors":"R. Negres, C. Stolz, Michael D. Thomas, M. Caputo","doi":"10.1117/12.2531861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This year’s competition aimed to survey state-of-the-art near-IR high reflectors. The requirements of the coatings were a minimum reflection of 99.5% at 0 degrees incidence angle light at 1064-nm. The choice of coating materials, design, and deposition method were left to the participants. Laser damage testing was performed at a single testing facility using the ISO standard protocol with a 3-ns pulse length laser system operating at 5 Hz in a multi-longitudinal mode. A double blind test assured sample and submitter anonymity. The damage performance results (LIDT) and sample rankings are compared to last year’s competition results where raster scanning test protocol was involved. In addition, details of the deposition processes, coating materials and substrate cleaning method are also shared. We found that hafnia/silica multilayer coatings deposited by e-beam are the most damage resistant under the test conditions. LIDT differences between testing protocols were up to 38 J/cm2, with ISO-reported LIDT results generally higher than those determined by raster scanning.","PeriodicalId":202227,"journal":{"name":"Laser Damage","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1064-nm, nanosecond laser mirror thin film damage competition\",\"authors\":\"R. Negres, C. Stolz, Michael D. Thomas, M. Caputo\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2531861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This year’s competition aimed to survey state-of-the-art near-IR high reflectors. The requirements of the coatings were a minimum reflection of 99.5% at 0 degrees incidence angle light at 1064-nm. The choice of coating materials, design, and deposition method were left to the participants. Laser damage testing was performed at a single testing facility using the ISO standard protocol with a 3-ns pulse length laser system operating at 5 Hz in a multi-longitudinal mode. A double blind test assured sample and submitter anonymity. The damage performance results (LIDT) and sample rankings are compared to last year’s competition results where raster scanning test protocol was involved. In addition, details of the deposition processes, coating materials and substrate cleaning method are also shared. We found that hafnia/silica multilayer coatings deposited by e-beam are the most damage resistant under the test conditions. LIDT differences between testing protocols were up to 38 J/cm2, with ISO-reported LIDT results generally higher than those determined by raster scanning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laser Damage\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laser Damage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2531861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser Damage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2531861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

今年的竞赛旨在调查最先进的近红外高反射器。对涂层的要求是在1064纳米的0度入射角光线下的最低反射率为99.5%。涂层材料、设计和沉积方法的选择留给了参与者。激光损伤测试采用ISO标准协议,在单个测试设备上使用3ns脉冲长度的激光系统,在多纵向模式下以5hz的频率工作。双盲测试保证了样本和提交者的匿名性。损伤性能结果(LIDT)和样本排名与去年使用光栅扫描测试协议的比赛结果进行了比较。此外,还分享了沉积工艺,涂层材料和基材清洁方法的细节。结果表明,电子束沉积的半氟硅/二氧化硅多层涂层在实验条件下的抗损伤能力最强。测试方案之间的LIDT差异高达38 J/cm2, iso报告的LIDT结果通常高于光栅扫描确定的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1064-nm, nanosecond laser mirror thin film damage competition
This year’s competition aimed to survey state-of-the-art near-IR high reflectors. The requirements of the coatings were a minimum reflection of 99.5% at 0 degrees incidence angle light at 1064-nm. The choice of coating materials, design, and deposition method were left to the participants. Laser damage testing was performed at a single testing facility using the ISO standard protocol with a 3-ns pulse length laser system operating at 5 Hz in a multi-longitudinal mode. A double blind test assured sample and submitter anonymity. The damage performance results (LIDT) and sample rankings are compared to last year’s competition results where raster scanning test protocol was involved. In addition, details of the deposition processes, coating materials and substrate cleaning method are also shared. We found that hafnia/silica multilayer coatings deposited by e-beam are the most damage resistant under the test conditions. LIDT differences between testing protocols were up to 38 J/cm2, with ISO-reported LIDT results generally higher than those determined by raster scanning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
All-glass metasurface laser optics for lensing, antireflections, and waveplates Laser-induced damage of dielectric-enhanced surface-modified single-point-diamond-turned Al-6061 multiband mirrors Optical damage considerations in the design of the matter in extreme condition upgrade (MEC-U) laser systems Broadband, 920-nm mirror thin film damage competition Temporally and spatially resolved photoluminescence of laser-induced damage sites of fused silica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1