个性会影响静态分析工具的使用吗?探索性实验

Jan-Peter Ostberg, S. Wagner, Erica Weilemann
{"title":"个性会影响静态分析工具的使用吗?探索性实验","authors":"Jan-Peter Ostberg, S. Wagner, Erica Weilemann","doi":"10.1145/2897586.2897599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many techniques to improve software quality. One is using automatic static analysis tools. We have observed, however, that despite the low-cost help they offer, these tools areunderused and often discourage beginners. There is evidence that personality traits influence the perceived usability of a software. Thus, to support beginners better, we need to understand how theworkflow of people with different prevalent personality traits using these tools varies. For this purpose, we observed users’ solution strategies and correlated them with their prevalent personality traits in an exploratory study with student participants within a controlled experiment. We gathered data by screen capturing and chat protocols as well as a Big Five personality traits test. We found strong correlations between particular personality traits and different strategies of removing the findings of static code analysis as well as between personality and tool utilization. Based on that, we offer take-away improvement suggestions. Our results imply that developers should be aware of these solution strategies and use this information to build tools that are more appealing to people with different prevalent personality traits.","PeriodicalId":318848,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Personality Influence the Usage of Static Analysis Tools? An Explorative Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Jan-Peter Ostberg, S. Wagner, Erica Weilemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2897586.2897599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many techniques to improve software quality. One is using automatic static analysis tools. We have observed, however, that despite the low-cost help they offer, these tools areunderused and often discourage beginners. There is evidence that personality traits influence the perceived usability of a software. Thus, to support beginners better, we need to understand how theworkflow of people with different prevalent personality traits using these tools varies. For this purpose, we observed users’ solution strategies and correlated them with their prevalent personality traits in an exploratory study with student participants within a controlled experiment. We gathered data by screen capturing and chat protocols as well as a Big Five personality traits test. We found strong correlations between particular personality traits and different strategies of removing the findings of static code analysis as well as between personality and tool utilization. Based on that, we offer take-away improvement suggestions. Our results imply that developers should be aware of these solution strategies and use this information to build tools that are more appealing to people with different prevalent personality traits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586.2897599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586.2897599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

有许多技术可以提高软件质量。一种是使用自动静态分析工具。然而,我们观察到,尽管它们提供了低成本的帮助,但这些工具没有得到充分利用,而且经常使初学者感到气馁。有证据表明,个性特征会影响软件的可用性。因此,为了更好地支持初学者,我们需要了解具有不同普遍人格特征的人使用这些工具的工作流程是如何变化的。为此,我们在一项探索性研究中观察了用户的解决方案策略,并将其与学生参与者的普遍人格特征相关联。我们通过截屏和聊天协议以及五大人格特质测试来收集数据。我们发现,在特定的人格特征和不同的消除静态代码分析结果的策略之间,以及在人格和工具使用之间,存在很强的相关性。在此基础上,我们提供外卖改进建议。我们的研究结果表明,开发人员应该意识到这些解决方案策略,并利用这些信息来构建对具有不同普遍人格特征的人更有吸引力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Personality Influence the Usage of Static Analysis Tools? An Explorative Experiment
There are many techniques to improve software quality. One is using automatic static analysis tools. We have observed, however, that despite the low-cost help they offer, these tools areunderused and often discourage beginners. There is evidence that personality traits influence the perceived usability of a software. Thus, to support beginners better, we need to understand how theworkflow of people with different prevalent personality traits using these tools varies. For this purpose, we observed users’ solution strategies and correlated them with their prevalent personality traits in an exploratory study with student participants within a controlled experiment. We gathered data by screen capturing and chat protocols as well as a Big Five personality traits test. We found strong correlations between particular personality traits and different strategies of removing the findings of static code analysis as well as between personality and tool utilization. Based on that, we offer take-away improvement suggestions. Our results imply that developers should be aware of these solution strategies and use this information to build tools that are more appealing to people with different prevalent personality traits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sociodrama: One More Technique to Foster Collaboration in Software Engineering GO-MUC: A Strategy Design Method Considering Requirements of User and Business by Goal-Oriented Measurement Beliefs, Practices, and Personalities of Software Engineers: A Survey in a Large Software Company Collaboration Change in Enterprise Software Development Code Review Participation: Game Theoretical Modeling of Reviewers in Gerrit Datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1