砂土通电对机车轮轨黏附过程影响的评估

M. Gorbunov, K. Kravchenko, G. Bureika, J. Gerlici, O. Nozhenko, G. Vaičiūnas, V. Bučinskas, S. Steišūnas
{"title":"砂土通电对机车轮轨黏附过程影响的评估","authors":"M. Gorbunov, K. Kravchenko, G. Bureika, J. Gerlici, O. Nozhenko, G. Vaičiūnas, V. Bučinskas, S. Steišūnas","doi":"10.17531/EIN.2019.3.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The desire for threshold of use of traction effort and power of locomotives is associated with an increased tendency of the driven wheelsets to slippage. This determines the need to use different means to increase the level of the adhesion of the locomotive wheels with rails and to ensure the stability of the traction [25, 26]. On the other hand, a high value of the adhesive coefficient is a major factor for realizing the maximum braking force of a train when using friction brakes and significantly increases the level of traffic safety [20]. This is especially true in case of emergency braking or an emergency stopping of trains before prohibitive traffic lights have turned on unexpectedly, i. e. it is essential to avoid the case of the railway station overruns or SPAD signal passing at danger [16]. The most common way to increase adhesion is to use silica sand or other mineral materials similar in hardness properties. This method, along with indisputable advantages (high efficiency, ease of use, relative cheapness) has obvious disadvantages: clogging of ballast, increased wear of wheels and rails [7, 23], increased resistance to movement in traction mode. Given the above disadvantages, the optimization of the use of sand is relevant. The spraying of sand into the wheel–rail contact is one of the most effective ways to enhance the friction between the driven wheels and rail under conditions of low adhesion, especially on intensive acceleration or emergency braking running modes. The scientific works carried out by worldwide researchers on reasons of low adhesion showed that wheel/ rail adhesion coefficient (the ratio of normal to friction force in the contact) varied between 0.04 and 0.55, averaging 0.3 in dry conditions. The impact of adding moisture to the rail reduced this average to 0.2, still the leaves can reduce the adhesion coefficient as low as 0.02 [23, 24]. Other causes of low adhesion have been identified as: general moisture/dampness combined with contaminants such as rust, ice, coal dust, leaf, spilled diesel fuel/ lubricating oils/flange lubricating grease/hydraulic fluid, airborne kerosene from nearby airports, or other chemicals from industrial sites [3]. Lewis S. R. et al. and Wang et al. [24, 35] carried out comprehensive research work using a full-scale laboratory rail–wheel test machine to find the position for the hose and sand flow rates that give optimum sand entrainment to the contact. It was found that ideGorbunov M, KrAvchenKo K, bureiKA G, Gerlici J, nozhenKo o, vAičiūnAs G, bučinsKAs v, steišūnAs s. estimation of sand electrification influence on locomotive wheel / rail adhesion processes. eksploatacja i niezawodnosc – Maintenance and reliability 2019; 21 (3): 460–467, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.3.12.","PeriodicalId":309533,"journal":{"name":"Ekspolatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of sand electrification influence on locomotive wheel / rail adhesion processes\",\"authors\":\"M. Gorbunov, K. Kravchenko, G. Bureika, J. Gerlici, O. Nozhenko, G. Vaičiūnas, V. Bučinskas, S. Steišūnas\",\"doi\":\"10.17531/EIN.2019.3.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The desire for threshold of use of traction effort and power of locomotives is associated with an increased tendency of the driven wheelsets to slippage. This determines the need to use different means to increase the level of the adhesion of the locomotive wheels with rails and to ensure the stability of the traction [25, 26]. On the other hand, a high value of the adhesive coefficient is a major factor for realizing the maximum braking force of a train when using friction brakes and significantly increases the level of traffic safety [20]. This is especially true in case of emergency braking or an emergency stopping of trains before prohibitive traffic lights have turned on unexpectedly, i. e. it is essential to avoid the case of the railway station overruns or SPAD signal passing at danger [16]. The most common way to increase adhesion is to use silica sand or other mineral materials similar in hardness properties. This method, along with indisputable advantages (high efficiency, ease of use, relative cheapness) has obvious disadvantages: clogging of ballast, increased wear of wheels and rails [7, 23], increased resistance to movement in traction mode. Given the above disadvantages, the optimization of the use of sand is relevant. The spraying of sand into the wheel–rail contact is one of the most effective ways to enhance the friction between the driven wheels and rail under conditions of low adhesion, especially on intensive acceleration or emergency braking running modes. The scientific works carried out by worldwide researchers on reasons of low adhesion showed that wheel/ rail adhesion coefficient (the ratio of normal to friction force in the contact) varied between 0.04 and 0.55, averaging 0.3 in dry conditions. The impact of adding moisture to the rail reduced this average to 0.2, still the leaves can reduce the adhesion coefficient as low as 0.02 [23, 24]. Other causes of low adhesion have been identified as: general moisture/dampness combined with contaminants such as rust, ice, coal dust, leaf, spilled diesel fuel/ lubricating oils/flange lubricating grease/hydraulic fluid, airborne kerosene from nearby airports, or other chemicals from industrial sites [3]. Lewis S. R. et al. and Wang et al. [24, 35] carried out comprehensive research work using a full-scale laboratory rail–wheel test machine to find the position for the hose and sand flow rates that give optimum sand entrainment to the contact. It was found that ideGorbunov M, KrAvchenKo K, bureiKA G, Gerlici J, nozhenKo o, vAičiūnAs G, bučinsKAs v, steišūnAs s. estimation of sand electrification influence on locomotive wheel / rail adhesion processes. eksploatacja i niezawodnosc – Maintenance and reliability 2019; 21 (3): 460–467, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.3.12.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekspolatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekspolatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17531/EIN.2019.3.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekspolatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17531/EIN.2019.3.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对机车牵引力和动力使用阈值的要求与驱动轮对滑移趋势的增加有关。这就决定了需要采用不同的手段来提高机车车轮与轨道的附着程度,保证牵引的稳定性[25,26]。另一方面,较高的粘着系数是实现列车在使用摩擦制动器时制动力最大化的重要因素,可以显著提高交通安全水平[20]。特别是在禁止性交通灯未意外亮起前紧急刹车或紧急停车时,即必须避免发生火车站超限或SPAD信号危险通过的情况[16]。增加附着力最常用的方法是使用硅砂或其他硬度性质相似的矿物材料。这种方法虽然具有无可争辩的优点(效率高、使用方便、相对便宜),但缺点也很明显:会堵塞镇流器,增加车轮和轨道的磨损[7,23],增加牵引模式下的运动阻力。鉴于上述缺点,砂的优化使用是相关的。在低附着条件下,特别是在强烈加速或紧急制动运行模式下,向轮轨接触处喷砂是提高从动轮与轨道之间摩擦力的最有效方法之一。全球研究人员对低附着原因进行的科学研究表明,轮轨附着系数(接触中法向力与摩擦力的比值)在0.04至0.55之间变化,在干燥条件下平均为0.3。在钢轨中添加水分的影响下,这一平均值降至0.2,但叶片仍能将附着系数降低至0.02[23,24]。其他低附着力的原因已被确定为:一般的潮湿/潮湿与污染物结合,如铁锈、冰、煤尘、树叶、溢出的柴油/润滑油/法兰润滑油脂/液压油、附近机场的空中煤油或工业场所的其他化学品[3]。Lewis S. R.等人和Wang等人[24,35]使用全尺寸实验室轨道轮试验机进行了全面的研究工作,以找到软管的位置和砂流速率,从而为接触面提供最佳的含砂量。ideGorbunov M, KrAvchenKo K, bureiKA G, Gerlici J, nozhenKo o, vAičiūnAs G, bu inskas v, steišūnAs .砂电气化对机车轮轨黏附过程影响的估计。eksploatacja i niezawodnosc -维护和可靠性2019;21 (3): 460-467, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.3.12。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of sand electrification influence on locomotive wheel / rail adhesion processes
The desire for threshold of use of traction effort and power of locomotives is associated with an increased tendency of the driven wheelsets to slippage. This determines the need to use different means to increase the level of the adhesion of the locomotive wheels with rails and to ensure the stability of the traction [25, 26]. On the other hand, a high value of the adhesive coefficient is a major factor for realizing the maximum braking force of a train when using friction brakes and significantly increases the level of traffic safety [20]. This is especially true in case of emergency braking or an emergency stopping of trains before prohibitive traffic lights have turned on unexpectedly, i. e. it is essential to avoid the case of the railway station overruns or SPAD signal passing at danger [16]. The most common way to increase adhesion is to use silica sand or other mineral materials similar in hardness properties. This method, along with indisputable advantages (high efficiency, ease of use, relative cheapness) has obvious disadvantages: clogging of ballast, increased wear of wheels and rails [7, 23], increased resistance to movement in traction mode. Given the above disadvantages, the optimization of the use of sand is relevant. The spraying of sand into the wheel–rail contact is one of the most effective ways to enhance the friction between the driven wheels and rail under conditions of low adhesion, especially on intensive acceleration or emergency braking running modes. The scientific works carried out by worldwide researchers on reasons of low adhesion showed that wheel/ rail adhesion coefficient (the ratio of normal to friction force in the contact) varied between 0.04 and 0.55, averaging 0.3 in dry conditions. The impact of adding moisture to the rail reduced this average to 0.2, still the leaves can reduce the adhesion coefficient as low as 0.02 [23, 24]. Other causes of low adhesion have been identified as: general moisture/dampness combined with contaminants such as rust, ice, coal dust, leaf, spilled diesel fuel/ lubricating oils/flange lubricating grease/hydraulic fluid, airborne kerosene from nearby airports, or other chemicals from industrial sites [3]. Lewis S. R. et al. and Wang et al. [24, 35] carried out comprehensive research work using a full-scale laboratory rail–wheel test machine to find the position for the hose and sand flow rates that give optimum sand entrainment to the contact. It was found that ideGorbunov M, KrAvchenKo K, bureiKA G, Gerlici J, nozhenKo o, vAičiūnAs G, bučinsKAs v, steišūnAs s. estimation of sand electrification influence on locomotive wheel / rail adhesion processes. eksploatacja i niezawodnosc – Maintenance and reliability 2019; 21 (3): 460–467, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.3.12.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A system reliability-based design optimization for the scraper chain of scraper conveyors with dependent failure modes Reliability analysis of complex uncertainty multi-state system based on Bayesian network Methodology of overall equipment effectiveness calculation in the context of Industry 4.0 environment The use of a supply chain configuration model to assess the reliability of logistics processes Reliability model of sequence motions and its solving idea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1