支持“好”(或至少“更好”)的死亡:超越偏好、程序和协议

D. B. McCurdy
{"title":"支持“好”(或至少“更好”)的死亡:超越偏好、程序和协议","authors":"D. B. McCurdy","doi":"10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consensus view that the SUPPORT project “failed” should not obscure the significance of the effort itself—or its importance for chaplains. The author sketches two sets of concerns SUPPORT raises for chaplains and for pastoral care in health care. He describes some distinctive challenges these concerns create for chaplains.","PeriodicalId":252852,"journal":{"name":"The Caregiver Journal","volume":"862 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting A “Good” (or at Least “Better”) Death: Beyond Preferences, Procedures, and Protocols\",\"authors\":\"D. B. McCurdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The consensus view that the SUPPORT project “failed” should not obscure the significance of the effort itself—or its importance for chaplains. The author sketches two sets of concerns SUPPORT raises for chaplains and for pastoral care in health care. He describes some distinctive challenges these concerns create for chaplains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Caregiver Journal\",\"volume\":\"862 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Caregiver Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Caregiver Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支持项目“失败”的共识不应该掩盖努力本身的意义——或者它对牧师的重要性。作者概述了两组关注支持提出的牧师和教牧关怀在卫生保健。他描述了这些担忧给牧师带来的一些独特挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting A “Good” (or at Least “Better”) Death: Beyond Preferences, Procedures, and Protocols
The consensus view that the SUPPORT project “failed” should not obscure the significance of the effort itself—or its importance for chaplains. The author sketches two sets of concerns SUPPORT raises for chaplains and for pastoral care in health care. He describes some distinctive challenges these concerns create for chaplains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The SUPPORT Study: An Alternative Scenario Support: The Challenge to Chaplains An Exploring Places to Worship Group for Recipients of Psychiatric Services Supporting A “Good” (or at Least “Better”) Death: Beyond Preferences, Procedures, and Protocols Destroy…But Not Quite
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1