伊本对因果关系和理性知识的批判方法Khaldūn

ULUM Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.54659/ulum.837132
E. Kaya
{"title":"伊本对因果关系和理性知识的批判方法Khaldūn","authors":"E. Kaya","doi":"10.54659/ulum.837132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to critically approach the thoughts of causality and rational knowledge in Ibn Khaldūn, who is one of the greatest names of Islamic philosophy. Ibn Khaldūn, who is a tremendously competent sociologist, historian, and politician, constituted his work entitled Muqaddima in a way exhib-iting the science of ʿumrān. One of the fundamentals of science undoubtedly is the theory of causality. We see that Ibn Khaldūn, who construed everything in the universe in the light of the causality, does not use the same theory when miracles and supernatural events are in question. This differentiation basing on the distinction of the human intellect and divine revelation has not eliminated any contradiction coming out in the context of the causality. Another matter we examine in this study is the critique of Ibn Khal-dūn about rational knowledge against philosophers. According to him, it is not a correct method reaching the universals with abstractions made from the particulars. It is because such universals have not been compatible with the facts. Ibn Khaldūn criticizes the philosophers in the context of metaphysical knowledge. But, if we consider the science of ʿumrān to be a kind of metaphysics, we might say that his method contains some contradictions.","PeriodicalId":157960,"journal":{"name":"ULUM","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Approach to Causality and Rational Knowledge in Ibn Khaldūn\",\"authors\":\"E. Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.54659/ulum.837132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to critically approach the thoughts of causality and rational knowledge in Ibn Khaldūn, who is one of the greatest names of Islamic philosophy. Ibn Khaldūn, who is a tremendously competent sociologist, historian, and politician, constituted his work entitled Muqaddima in a way exhib-iting the science of ʿumrān. One of the fundamentals of science undoubtedly is the theory of causality. We see that Ibn Khaldūn, who construed everything in the universe in the light of the causality, does not use the same theory when miracles and supernatural events are in question. This differentiation basing on the distinction of the human intellect and divine revelation has not eliminated any contradiction coming out in the context of the causality. Another matter we examine in this study is the critique of Ibn Khal-dūn about rational knowledge against philosophers. According to him, it is not a correct method reaching the universals with abstractions made from the particulars. It is because such universals have not been compatible with the facts. Ibn Khaldūn criticizes the philosophers in the context of metaphysical knowledge. But, if we consider the science of ʿumrān to be a kind of metaphysics, we might say that his method contains some contradictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":157960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ULUM\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ULUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.837132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ULUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.837132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是批判性地探讨伊本Khaldūn的因果关系和理性知识思想,伊本是伊斯兰哲学最伟大的名字之一。伊本Khaldūn是一位非常有能力的社会学家、历史学家和政治家,他的著作《穆卡迪马》以一种展示科学的方式umrān。毫无疑问,科学的基础之一是因果关系理论。我们看到伊本Khaldūn,谁解释宇宙中的一切在因果关系的光,不使用相同的理论,当奇迹和超自然事件的问题。这种基于人的智力和神的启示的区别的区分并没有消除因果关系背景下出现的任何矛盾。我们在本研究中考察的另一个问题是伊本Khal-dūn关于理性知识对哲学家的批判。根据他的观点,用由特殊性构成的抽象来达到共相并不是正确的方法。这是因为这种普遍性与事实不符。伊本Khaldūn在形而上学知识的语境中批判哲学家。但是,如果我们把密umrān的科学看作是一种形而上学,我们就可以说他的方法包含着一些矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical Approach to Causality and Rational Knowledge in Ibn Khaldūn
The purpose of this study is to critically approach the thoughts of causality and rational knowledge in Ibn Khaldūn, who is one of the greatest names of Islamic philosophy. Ibn Khaldūn, who is a tremendously competent sociologist, historian, and politician, constituted his work entitled Muqaddima in a way exhib-iting the science of ʿumrān. One of the fundamentals of science undoubtedly is the theory of causality. We see that Ibn Khaldūn, who construed everything in the universe in the light of the causality, does not use the same theory when miracles and supernatural events are in question. This differentiation basing on the distinction of the human intellect and divine revelation has not eliminated any contradiction coming out in the context of the causality. Another matter we examine in this study is the critique of Ibn Khal-dūn about rational knowledge against philosophers. According to him, it is not a correct method reaching the universals with abstractions made from the particulars. It is because such universals have not been compatible with the facts. Ibn Khaldūn criticizes the philosophers in the context of metaphysical knowledge. But, if we consider the science of ʿumrān to be a kind of metaphysics, we might say that his method contains some contradictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığının Doğal Afetler Hakkındaki Yaklaşımı Hassa’nın Kuruluşu, Halep Vilayet Salnamelerine Göre İdarî, Sosyal ve Kültürel Durumu ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Shaʿrānī’s Ishari Tafsīr on Āyāt About Wuḍūʾ and Ṣalāt Evaluation of the Higher Religious Education in Turkey 1997-2020 Book Afetlerin Ceza Olduğunu Çağrıştıran Ayetlere Mâtürîdî’nin Yaklaşımı (Te’vîlâtü’l-Kur’ân Özelinde)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1