分析和修复编译错误

A. Mesbah, A. Rice, E. Aftandilian, Emily Johnston, Nick Glorioso
{"title":"分析和修复编译错误","authors":"A. Mesbah, A. Rice, E. Aftandilian, Emily Johnston, Nick Glorioso","doi":"10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resolving a build failure consumes developer time both in finding a suitable resolution and in rerunning the build. Our goal is to develop automated repair tools that can automatically resolve build errors and therefore improve developer productivity. We collected data on the resolution of Java build failures to discover how long developers spend resolving different kinds of diagnostics at Google. We found that the diagnostic reporting an unresolved symbol consumes 47% of the total time spent resolving broken builds. We found that choice of tool has a significant impact: 26% of command line builds fail whereas only 3% of IDE builds fail. However, the set of most costly diagnostic kinds remains the same for both. We trained a Neural Machine Translation model on the Abstract Syntax Tree changes made when resolving an unresolved symbol failure. This generates a correct fix with a true positive rate of 50%.","PeriodicalId":273100,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing and Repairing Compilation Errors\",\"authors\":\"A. Mesbah, A. Rice, E. Aftandilian, Emily Johnston, Nick Glorioso\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resolving a build failure consumes developer time both in finding a suitable resolution and in rerunning the build. Our goal is to develop automated repair tools that can automatically resolve build errors and therefore improve developer productivity. We collected data on the resolution of Java build failures to discover how long developers spend resolving different kinds of diagnostics at Google. We found that the diagnostic reporting an unresolved symbol consumes 47% of the total time spent resolving broken builds. We found that choice of tool has a significant impact: 26% of command line builds fail whereas only 3% of IDE builds fail. However, the set of most costly diagnostic kinds remains the same for both. We trained a Neural Machine Translation model on the Abstract Syntax Tree changes made when resolving an unresolved symbol failure. This generates a correct fix with a true positive rate of 50%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion)\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

解决构建失败会消耗开发人员寻找合适的解决方案和重新运行构建的时间。我们的目标是开发能够自动解决构建错误的自动修复工具,从而提高开发人员的工作效率。我们收集了关于解决Java构建失败的数据,以发现开发人员在Google上解决不同类型的诊断所花费的时间。我们发现,诊断报告一个未解决的符号消耗了解决损坏构建所花费的总时间的47%。我们发现工具的选择有很大的影响:26%的命令行构建失败,而只有3%的IDE构建失败。然而,对这两种疾病来说,最昂贵的诊断方法仍然是一样的。我们在抽象语法树上训练了一个神经机器翻译模型,该模型是在解决未解决的符号错误时所做的更改。这将生成一个真阳性率为50%的正确修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing and Repairing Compilation Errors
Resolving a build failure consumes developer time both in finding a suitable resolution and in rerunning the build. Our goal is to develop automated repair tools that can automatically resolve build errors and therefore improve developer productivity. We collected data on the resolution of Java build failures to discover how long developers spend resolving different kinds of diagnostics at Google. We found that the diagnostic reporting an unresolved symbol consumes 47% of the total time spent resolving broken builds. We found that choice of tool has a significant impact: 26% of command line builds fail whereas only 3% of IDE builds fail. However, the set of most costly diagnostic kinds remains the same for both. We trained a Neural Machine Translation model on the Abstract Syntax Tree changes made when resolving an unresolved symbol failure. This generates a correct fix with a true positive rate of 50%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Deterioration of Learning-Based Malware Detectors for Android Quantifying Patterns and Programming Strategies in Block-Based Programming Environments A Data-Driven Security Game to Facilitate Information Security Education Toward Detection and Characterization of Variability Bugs in Configurable C Software: An Empirical Study Mimicking User Behavior to Improve In-House Test Suites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1