{"title":"中国正畸患者角1类、角2类、角3类错颌舌弓形态的评价","authors":"N. Zhou, Ommega Internationals","doi":"10.15436/2379-1705.18.1645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"page no: 30/37 www.ommegaonline.org Vol:4 Issue: 2 Abstract: Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the dental lingual arch widths and lengths, alveolar arch within patients with Angle’s Class I (ACI), Class IIdivision1 (ACII) and Class III (ACIII) malocclusions in Chinese patients. Methods: This study was performed using measurements on ninety dental casts with ACI (age: 22.2 ± 3.6), ACII (age: 23.0 ± 3.8), and ACIII (age: 22.0 ± 2.8) malocclusion subjects. Two-way ANOVA post-hoc and nonparametric tests were applied for comparisons in groups and genders. Results: Maxillary canineand premolar alveolar widths and all maxillary lingual lengths were significantly narrower in ACIII (p < 0.05). The mandibular intercanine andintermolar widths were wider and the maxillary intermolar width measurement was larger in ACIII (p < 0.05). Male’s palate height in ACIII was greater than ACII (p < 0.05). Gender differences were also significant in these measurements. Conclusions: Our data showed undergrowth of the maxilla and overgrowth of the mandible and incisor inclined lingual in ACIII; mandibular growth retrusion and maxillary incisor inclined in ACII. Alveolar width was greater in males than females.","PeriodicalId":413741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry and Oral Care","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Lingual Arch form among Angle Class I, Class Iiand Class III Malocclusions in Chinese Orthodontic Patients\",\"authors\":\"N. Zhou, Ommega Internationals\",\"doi\":\"10.15436/2379-1705.18.1645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"page no: 30/37 www.ommegaonline.org Vol:4 Issue: 2 Abstract: Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the dental lingual arch widths and lengths, alveolar arch within patients with Angle’s Class I (ACI), Class IIdivision1 (ACII) and Class III (ACIII) malocclusions in Chinese patients. Methods: This study was performed using measurements on ninety dental casts with ACI (age: 22.2 ± 3.6), ACII (age: 23.0 ± 3.8), and ACIII (age: 22.0 ± 2.8) malocclusion subjects. Two-way ANOVA post-hoc and nonparametric tests were applied for comparisons in groups and genders. Results: Maxillary canineand premolar alveolar widths and all maxillary lingual lengths were significantly narrower in ACIII (p < 0.05). The mandibular intercanine andintermolar widths were wider and the maxillary intermolar width measurement was larger in ACIII (p < 0.05). Male’s palate height in ACIII was greater than ACII (p < 0.05). Gender differences were also significant in these measurements. Conclusions: Our data showed undergrowth of the maxilla and overgrowth of the mandible and incisor inclined lingual in ACIII; mandibular growth retrusion and maxillary incisor inclined in ACII. Alveolar width was greater in males than females.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dentistry and Oral Care\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dentistry and Oral Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15436/2379-1705.18.1645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry and Oral Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15436/2379-1705.18.1645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Lingual Arch form among Angle Class I, Class Iiand Class III Malocclusions in Chinese Orthodontic Patients
page no: 30/37 www.ommegaonline.org Vol:4 Issue: 2 Abstract: Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the dental lingual arch widths and lengths, alveolar arch within patients with Angle’s Class I (ACI), Class IIdivision1 (ACII) and Class III (ACIII) malocclusions in Chinese patients. Methods: This study was performed using measurements on ninety dental casts with ACI (age: 22.2 ± 3.6), ACII (age: 23.0 ± 3.8), and ACIII (age: 22.0 ± 2.8) malocclusion subjects. Two-way ANOVA post-hoc and nonparametric tests were applied for comparisons in groups and genders. Results: Maxillary canineand premolar alveolar widths and all maxillary lingual lengths were significantly narrower in ACIII (p < 0.05). The mandibular intercanine andintermolar widths were wider and the maxillary intermolar width measurement was larger in ACIII (p < 0.05). Male’s palate height in ACIII was greater than ACII (p < 0.05). Gender differences were also significant in these measurements. Conclusions: Our data showed undergrowth of the maxilla and overgrowth of the mandible and incisor inclined lingual in ACIII; mandibular growth retrusion and maxillary incisor inclined in ACII. Alveolar width was greater in males than females.