双刃剑移民政策和跨国寻租利益

Akihiro Koido
{"title":"双刃剑移民政策和跨国寻租利益","authors":"Akihiro Koido","doi":"10.36852/2695-4427_2022_06.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been contradictory trends in migration policies in advanced countries since the 1990s: states have actively recruited desirable immigrants while they continued to deter and exclude unwanted migrants. The case of Japanese state not only represents this trend, but also shows a profoundly paradoxical case\nin the sense that it officially negated incorporation of “immigrants” consistently though it has built up multiple channels of transnational labor supply for their urgent needs. It is particularly so because Japan has maintained the divergent policies in the middle of well-known demographic crisis with aging population.\n\nThese bifurcated policies can be understood partially by the growing role of “migration industry” in the neoliberal era as recent research showed. However, simultaneous development of migration control machines and building migration pipelines urges us to make a further conceptual breakthrough. This paper introduces the concept of “rent-seeking” activities of stake holders of migration policies to explain persistent gaps between rigid state control of labor flows and active opening of diverse gates for supply of necessary labor by state initiatives. Emerging neo-liberal elites are seeking extra profit through institutional framework which creates\noligopolistic market structure by new side door policies such as National Strategic Special Zones for domestic workers and most recent new visa for middle skilled workers. This analysis of rent-seeking of contemporary migrant policies will open fresh eyes on contemporary immigration policies in different national contexts.","PeriodicalId":129637,"journal":{"name":"Migración y Refugio: Los retos y oportunidades en un mundo en movimiento","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-edged migration policies and transnational rent-seeking interests\",\"authors\":\"Akihiro Koido\",\"doi\":\"10.36852/2695-4427_2022_06.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There have been contradictory trends in migration policies in advanced countries since the 1990s: states have actively recruited desirable immigrants while they continued to deter and exclude unwanted migrants. The case of Japanese state not only represents this trend, but also shows a profoundly paradoxical case\\nin the sense that it officially negated incorporation of “immigrants” consistently though it has built up multiple channels of transnational labor supply for their urgent needs. It is particularly so because Japan has maintained the divergent policies in the middle of well-known demographic crisis with aging population.\\n\\nThese bifurcated policies can be understood partially by the growing role of “migration industry” in the neoliberal era as recent research showed. However, simultaneous development of migration control machines and building migration pipelines urges us to make a further conceptual breakthrough. This paper introduces the concept of “rent-seeking” activities of stake holders of migration policies to explain persistent gaps between rigid state control of labor flows and active opening of diverse gates for supply of necessary labor by state initiatives. Emerging neo-liberal elites are seeking extra profit through institutional framework which creates\\noligopolistic market structure by new side door policies such as National Strategic Special Zones for domestic workers and most recent new visa for middle skilled workers. This analysis of rent-seeking of contemporary migrant policies will open fresh eyes on contemporary immigration policies in different national contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Migración y Refugio: Los retos y oportunidades en un mundo en movimiento\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Migración y Refugio: Los retos y oportunidades en un mundo en movimiento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36852/2695-4427_2022_06.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migración y Refugio: Los retos y oportunidades en un mundo en movimiento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36852/2695-4427_2022_06.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自上世纪90年代以来,发达国家的移民政策出现了相互矛盾的趋势:各国在积极招募理想移民的同时,继续阻止和排斥不受欢迎的移民。日本政府的案例不仅代表了这一趋势,而且还显示了一个深刻的悖论,即它在为“移民”的迫切需求建立了多种跨国劳动力供应渠道的同时,却始终在官方上否定“移民”的纳入。尤其是在众所周知的人口老龄化危机中,日本一直保持着不同的政策。最近的研究表明,新自由主义时代“移民产业”的作用越来越大,可以部分地理解这些分化的政策。然而,迁移控制机器和构建迁移管道的同步发展促使我们进一步在概念上取得突破。本文引入了移民政策利益相关者“寻租”活动的概念,以解释国家对劳动力流动的严格控制与国家主动为必要劳动力供应打开各种大门之间的持续差距。新兴的新自由主义精英正通过新的侧门政策(如为家政工人设立国家战略特区和最近为中等技能工人提供新签证),通过创造寡头垄断市场结构的制度框架寻求额外利润。本文对当代移民政策的寻租分析,将为不同国情下的当代移民政策提供新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Double-edged migration policies and transnational rent-seeking interests
There have been contradictory trends in migration policies in advanced countries since the 1990s: states have actively recruited desirable immigrants while they continued to deter and exclude unwanted migrants. The case of Japanese state not only represents this trend, but also shows a profoundly paradoxical case in the sense that it officially negated incorporation of “immigrants” consistently though it has built up multiple channels of transnational labor supply for their urgent needs. It is particularly so because Japan has maintained the divergent policies in the middle of well-known demographic crisis with aging population. These bifurcated policies can be understood partially by the growing role of “migration industry” in the neoliberal era as recent research showed. However, simultaneous development of migration control machines and building migration pipelines urges us to make a further conceptual breakthrough. This paper introduces the concept of “rent-seeking” activities of stake holders of migration policies to explain persistent gaps between rigid state control of labor flows and active opening of diverse gates for supply of necessary labor by state initiatives. Emerging neo-liberal elites are seeking extra profit through institutional framework which creates oligopolistic market structure by new side door policies such as National Strategic Special Zones for domestic workers and most recent new visa for middle skilled workers. This analysis of rent-seeking of contemporary migrant policies will open fresh eyes on contemporary immigration policies in different national contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Migración forzada y enfoque de la seguridad humana desde una perspectiva de género Más de 70 años protegiendo a quienes huyen de la persecución. Una responsabilidad de todos Retos de la gobernanza migratoria a nivel mundial. La movilidad humana, entre la anomia y el prejuicio Entre la gobernanza, la migración y el respeto de los derechos humanos de los migrantes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1