十年的欧洲外国投资政策-评估和未来展望

Maria João Palma
{"title":"十年的欧洲外国投资政策-评估和未来展望","authors":"Maria João Palma","doi":"10.51799/2763-8685v1n1005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Lisbon Treaty, which came into force in 2009, the European Union has been implementing the new competence in the area of foreign direct investment. All European institutions were actively involved in this process. I briefly analyze the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this process, establishing the links between Opinion 2/15 (EU/Singapore); Achmea Case and Opinion 1/17 (CETA), explaining why they are relevant in the overall framework of EU Foreign Investment policy, as it stands today, and what measures are needed to have an EU policy that is more coherent and uniformly applicable to all investors in the EU market.","PeriodicalId":171261,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uma década de política europeia de investimento estrangeiro – balanço e perspetivas futuras\",\"authors\":\"Maria João Palma\",\"doi\":\"10.51799/2763-8685v1n1005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the Lisbon Treaty, which came into force in 2009, the European Union has been implementing the new competence in the area of foreign direct investment. All European institutions were actively involved in this process. I briefly analyze the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this process, establishing the links between Opinion 2/15 (EU/Singapore); Achmea Case and Opinion 1/17 (CETA), explaining why they are relevant in the overall framework of EU Foreign Investment policy, as it stands today, and what measures are needed to have an EU policy that is more coherent and uniformly applicable to all investors in the EU market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of European Studies\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of European Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v1n1005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v1n1005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2009年《里斯本条约》生效以来,欧盟一直在实施外国直接投资领域的新权限。所有欧洲机构都积极参与了这一进程。我简要分析了欧洲联盟法院在这一进程中的作用,建立了第2/15号意见(欧盟/新加坡);Achmea案例和意见1/17 (CETA),解释了为什么它们在欧盟外国投资政策的总体框架中是相关的,就像今天一样,以及需要采取哪些措施来制定一个更连贯和统一适用于欧盟市场上所有投资者的欧盟政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uma década de política europeia de investimento estrangeiro – balanço e perspetivas futuras
Since the Lisbon Treaty, which came into force in 2009, the European Union has been implementing the new competence in the area of foreign direct investment. All European institutions were actively involved in this process. I briefly analyze the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this process, establishing the links between Opinion 2/15 (EU/Singapore); Achmea Case and Opinion 1/17 (CETA), explaining why they are relevant in the overall framework of EU Foreign Investment policy, as it stands today, and what measures are needed to have an EU policy that is more coherent and uniformly applicable to all investors in the EU market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justiça e redes sociais: modelos comparados de regulamentação da liberdade de expressão dos Magistrados entre tutela dos direitos fundamentais e estado de direito Development of artificial intelligence in the AI-Mandamus project: elements of developed know-how The biometric habeas data in the digital and algorithmic era in the European Union Solidarity and the protection of migrants under European Union law Data protection in Mercosur: current situation, perspectives and project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1