科马克·麦卡锡与美国空间写作

O. Noble
{"title":"科马克·麦卡锡与美国空间写作","authors":"O. Noble","doi":"10.1163/9789401208994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estes, Andrew Keller. Cormac McCarthy and the Writing of American Spaces. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2013. 239 pp. Paperback. $70. ISBN 9789042036291.Review by O. Alan NobleAndrew Keller Estes' new book reveals the usefulness of environmental criticism for reading Cormac McCarthy's novels. His central argument is that McCarthy's later works present a dialectic vision of nature as either utopian or dystopian without privileging either vision. A synthesis of these perspectives comes out occasionally: \"some of McCarthy's texts hint at a new way forward, an escape from traditional ways of conceiving space and a better approach to environment\" (16). Estes describes this as a \"biocentric\" map: \"an egalitarian view of nature in which all members of the ecosphere have intrinsic rights\" (41). As an introduction to trends in environmental criticism and their applications to contemporary literature, Estes' book is insightful. His application of this criticism to McCarthy's novels varies in effectiveness. Interpreting the voices in the novels within the framework of environmental criticism generally is helpful for situating McCarthy in the larger movement of modernity and its relationship to environments. The most daring claim of the book, that McCarthy offers a \"new way forward,\" is regrettably less persuasive than it could be. Despite this deficiency, Estes has contributed a notable addition to McCarthy scholarship. His book will be an essential text for any scholars who wish to consider McCarthy and environmental criticism.Estes begins by presenting providing some theoretical context for environmental criticism and the American tradition of writing about nature, and then presents a survey of McCarthy scholarship. For readers who are new to this movement, the chapter on environmental criticism chapter will be particularly helpful. Estes lays out a brief survey of the important literature surrounding the major binaries that define environmental criticism (space/place, nature/culture, wilderness/civilization, etc.) and then connects that terminology to McCarthy's later works. In his second chapter, Estes gives a rich survey of the tradition in American literature of writing nature either in strongly positive or strongly negative terms. Estes traces each of these trends through American history, from the Edenic vision of Columbus and the demonic vision of Vespucci through the the utopian perspectives of Crevecoeur, Jefferson, and Emerson. Finally, Estes surveys McCarthy scholarship in general and choses three articles to focus on that pertain more closely to his thesis. Much of this survey feels extraneous to his argument. Of note is his treatment of John Cant's article on The Road included in Bloom's Modern Critical Views: Cormac McCarthy. Disappointingly, Estes chides Cant's reading of the \"roadmap\" as a metaphor for McCarthy's \"literary past\" (96). Estes objects because Cant \"fails to point out that it is an oil company roadmap, something which implies a very specific view of nature\" (96). It is unclear why Estes expects Cant to perform the same ecocritical reading of McCarthy as himself. Overall the theoretical half of Cormac McCarthy and the Writing of American Spaces is insightful, although the reader may wish he had opted to devote more space to his close readings.Estes starts his close reading with Blood Meridian, asserting that the novel interrogates and unsettles several binaries. An example of this is the collapse of the wilderness/civilization distinction in the scalp hunters (114). Estes reads the environments as largely reflecting the negative view of nature in American literature. Seemingly in line with this evil world, Estes interprets the judge as a caricature of the enlightenment belief that the earth is a wilderness that we must subdue and enslave. The judge's view of nature is challenged by the consequences of western expansion and the slaughter of the American buffalo. By showing the destructive, logical conclusion to \"mastering nature\" Blood Meridian encourages readers to rethink their relationship with nature, according to Estes. …","PeriodicalId":126318,"journal":{"name":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cormac McCarthy and the Writing of American Spaces\",\"authors\":\"O. Noble\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789401208994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Estes, Andrew Keller. Cormac McCarthy and the Writing of American Spaces. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2013. 239 pp. Paperback. $70. ISBN 9789042036291.Review by O. Alan NobleAndrew Keller Estes' new book reveals the usefulness of environmental criticism for reading Cormac McCarthy's novels. His central argument is that McCarthy's later works present a dialectic vision of nature as either utopian or dystopian without privileging either vision. A synthesis of these perspectives comes out occasionally: \\\"some of McCarthy's texts hint at a new way forward, an escape from traditional ways of conceiving space and a better approach to environment\\\" (16). Estes describes this as a \\\"biocentric\\\" map: \\\"an egalitarian view of nature in which all members of the ecosphere have intrinsic rights\\\" (41). As an introduction to trends in environmental criticism and their applications to contemporary literature, Estes' book is insightful. His application of this criticism to McCarthy's novels varies in effectiveness. Interpreting the voices in the novels within the framework of environmental criticism generally is helpful for situating McCarthy in the larger movement of modernity and its relationship to environments. The most daring claim of the book, that McCarthy offers a \\\"new way forward,\\\" is regrettably less persuasive than it could be. Despite this deficiency, Estes has contributed a notable addition to McCarthy scholarship. His book will be an essential text for any scholars who wish to consider McCarthy and environmental criticism.Estes begins by presenting providing some theoretical context for environmental criticism and the American tradition of writing about nature, and then presents a survey of McCarthy scholarship. For readers who are new to this movement, the chapter on environmental criticism chapter will be particularly helpful. Estes lays out a brief survey of the important literature surrounding the major binaries that define environmental criticism (space/place, nature/culture, wilderness/civilization, etc.) and then connects that terminology to McCarthy's later works. In his second chapter, Estes gives a rich survey of the tradition in American literature of writing nature either in strongly positive or strongly negative terms. Estes traces each of these trends through American history, from the Edenic vision of Columbus and the demonic vision of Vespucci through the the utopian perspectives of Crevecoeur, Jefferson, and Emerson. Finally, Estes surveys McCarthy scholarship in general and choses three articles to focus on that pertain more closely to his thesis. Much of this survey feels extraneous to his argument. Of note is his treatment of John Cant's article on The Road included in Bloom's Modern Critical Views: Cormac McCarthy. Disappointingly, Estes chides Cant's reading of the \\\"roadmap\\\" as a metaphor for McCarthy's \\\"literary past\\\" (96). Estes objects because Cant \\\"fails to point out that it is an oil company roadmap, something which implies a very specific view of nature\\\" (96). It is unclear why Estes expects Cant to perform the same ecocritical reading of McCarthy as himself. Overall the theoretical half of Cormac McCarthy and the Writing of American Spaces is insightful, although the reader may wish he had opted to devote more space to his close readings.Estes starts his close reading with Blood Meridian, asserting that the novel interrogates and unsettles several binaries. An example of this is the collapse of the wilderness/civilization distinction in the scalp hunters (114). Estes reads the environments as largely reflecting the negative view of nature in American literature. Seemingly in line with this evil world, Estes interprets the judge as a caricature of the enlightenment belief that the earth is a wilderness that we must subdue and enslave. The judge's view of nature is challenged by the consequences of western expansion and the slaughter of the American buffalo. By showing the destructive, logical conclusion to \\\"mastering nature\\\" Blood Meridian encourages readers to rethink their relationship with nature, according to Estes. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":126318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cormac McCarthy Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cormac McCarthy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401208994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401208994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

埃斯蒂斯,我是安德鲁·凯勒。科马克·麦卡锡与美国空间写作。阿姆斯特丹:Rodopi, 2013。239页平装本。70美元。ISBN 9789042036291。安德鲁·凯勒·埃斯蒂斯的新书揭示了环境批评对阅读科马克·麦卡锡小说的有用性。他的中心论点是,麦卡锡的后期作品呈现了一种辩证的自然视角,要么是乌托邦式的,要么是反乌托邦式的,而没有给予任何一种视角特权。这些观点的综合偶尔出现:“麦卡锡的一些文本暗示了一种新的前进方式,一种对传统空间构想方式的逃避和一种更好的环境方法”(16)。埃斯蒂斯将其描述为“以生物为中心”的地图:“一种平等主义的自然观,其中生态圈的所有成员都有内在的权利”(41)。作为对环境批评趋势及其在当代文学中的应用的介绍,埃斯蒂斯的书很有见地。他将这种批评运用到麦卡锡的小说中,效果各不相同。在环境批评的框架内解读小说中的声音通常有助于将麦卡锡置于更大的现代性运动及其与环境的关系中。令人遗憾的是,书中最大胆的主张——麦卡锡提供了一条“前进的新道路”——并没有达到应有的说服力。尽管有这些不足,埃斯蒂斯还是为麦卡锡学术做出了显著的贡献。对于任何想要研究麦卡锡和环境批评的学者来说,他的书都是必不可少的。埃斯蒂斯首先为环境批评和美国自然写作传统提供了一些理论背景,然后对麦卡锡学术进行了调查。对于刚接触这一运动的读者来说,关于环境批评的章节将会特别有帮助。埃斯蒂斯对界定环境批评的主要二元概念(空间/地点、自然/文化、荒野/文明等)周围的重要文献进行了简要概述,然后将这些术语与麦卡锡的后期作品联系起来。在他的第二章中,埃斯蒂斯对美国文学中以强烈积极或强烈消极的方式书写自然的传统进行了丰富的调查。埃斯蒂斯追溯了美国历史上的每一种趋势,从哥伦布的伊甸园观到韦斯普奇的恶魔观,再到克雷夫科尔、杰斐逊和爱默生的乌托邦观。最后,埃斯蒂斯调查了麦卡锡研究的总体情况,并选择了三篇与他的论文更密切相关的文章作为重点。这项调查的大部分内容与他的论点无关。值得注意的是,他在布鲁姆的《现代批评观点:科马克·麦卡锡》一书中对约翰·坎特关于《路》的文章的处理。令人失望的是,埃斯蒂斯指责坎特对“路线图”的解读是对麦卡锡“文学过去”的隐喻(96页)。埃斯蒂斯反对,因为坎特“没有指出这是一个石油公司的路线图,这意味着一个非常具体的自然观”(96)。目前尚不清楚为什么埃斯蒂斯希望坎特像他自己一样对麦卡锡进行生态批评的解读。总的来说,《科马克·麦卡锡与美国空间写作》的理论部分是有见地的,尽管读者可能希望他选择花更多的空间来仔细阅读。埃斯蒂斯以《血色子午线》开始了他的细读,他断言这部小说质疑并扰乱了几个二元对立。这方面的一个例子是在头皮猎人中荒野/文明区分的崩溃(114)。埃斯蒂斯认为环境在很大程度上反映了美国文学对自然的负面看法。似乎与这个邪恶的世界一致,埃斯蒂斯将法官解释为启蒙信仰的讽刺漫画,启蒙信仰认为地球是一片荒野,我们必须征服和奴役。法官对自然的看法受到了西部扩张和屠杀美洲野牛的后果的挑战。埃斯蒂斯说,通过展示“驾驭自然”这一具有破坏性的逻辑结论,《血色子午线》鼓励读者重新思考他们与自然的关系。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cormac McCarthy and the Writing of American Spaces
Estes, Andrew Keller. Cormac McCarthy and the Writing of American Spaces. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2013. 239 pp. Paperback. $70. ISBN 9789042036291.Review by O. Alan NobleAndrew Keller Estes' new book reveals the usefulness of environmental criticism for reading Cormac McCarthy's novels. His central argument is that McCarthy's later works present a dialectic vision of nature as either utopian or dystopian without privileging either vision. A synthesis of these perspectives comes out occasionally: "some of McCarthy's texts hint at a new way forward, an escape from traditional ways of conceiving space and a better approach to environment" (16). Estes describes this as a "biocentric" map: "an egalitarian view of nature in which all members of the ecosphere have intrinsic rights" (41). As an introduction to trends in environmental criticism and their applications to contemporary literature, Estes' book is insightful. His application of this criticism to McCarthy's novels varies in effectiveness. Interpreting the voices in the novels within the framework of environmental criticism generally is helpful for situating McCarthy in the larger movement of modernity and its relationship to environments. The most daring claim of the book, that McCarthy offers a "new way forward," is regrettably less persuasive than it could be. Despite this deficiency, Estes has contributed a notable addition to McCarthy scholarship. His book will be an essential text for any scholars who wish to consider McCarthy and environmental criticism.Estes begins by presenting providing some theoretical context for environmental criticism and the American tradition of writing about nature, and then presents a survey of McCarthy scholarship. For readers who are new to this movement, the chapter on environmental criticism chapter will be particularly helpful. Estes lays out a brief survey of the important literature surrounding the major binaries that define environmental criticism (space/place, nature/culture, wilderness/civilization, etc.) and then connects that terminology to McCarthy's later works. In his second chapter, Estes gives a rich survey of the tradition in American literature of writing nature either in strongly positive or strongly negative terms. Estes traces each of these trends through American history, from the Edenic vision of Columbus and the demonic vision of Vespucci through the the utopian perspectives of Crevecoeur, Jefferson, and Emerson. Finally, Estes surveys McCarthy scholarship in general and choses three articles to focus on that pertain more closely to his thesis. Much of this survey feels extraneous to his argument. Of note is his treatment of John Cant's article on The Road included in Bloom's Modern Critical Views: Cormac McCarthy. Disappointingly, Estes chides Cant's reading of the "roadmap" as a metaphor for McCarthy's "literary past" (96). Estes objects because Cant "fails to point out that it is an oil company roadmap, something which implies a very specific view of nature" (96). It is unclear why Estes expects Cant to perform the same ecocritical reading of McCarthy as himself. Overall the theoretical half of Cormac McCarthy and the Writing of American Spaces is insightful, although the reader may wish he had opted to devote more space to his close readings.Estes starts his close reading with Blood Meridian, asserting that the novel interrogates and unsettles several binaries. An example of this is the collapse of the wilderness/civilization distinction in the scalp hunters (114). Estes reads the environments as largely reflecting the negative view of nature in American literature. Seemingly in line with this evil world, Estes interprets the judge as a caricature of the enlightenment belief that the earth is a wilderness that we must subdue and enslave. The judge's view of nature is challenged by the consequences of western expansion and the slaughter of the American buffalo. By showing the destructive, logical conclusion to "mastering nature" Blood Meridian encourages readers to rethink their relationship with nature, according to Estes. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“The coming darkness”: Romantic Tragedy, Shakespeare, and Nahua Myth in Cormac McCarthy’s The Passenger and Stella Maris Religion Between the Parody of Faith and the Epiphany of Grace in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian “Selecting between the dream and the reality”: The Mexican Revolution in All the Pretty Horses Cormac McCarthy’s Earliest Publication: A Letter on the Beat Generation “Only the dead have seen an end to war”: Misattributing to Plato in Stella Maris?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1