《深刻的无知:现代气体学及其反现代的救赎》

David Ney
{"title":"《深刻的无知:现代气体学及其反现代的救赎》","authors":"David Ney","doi":"10.1177/1063851220952309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some readers will complain that A Profound Ignorance is a challenging book. Whatever the challenge, it cannot be attributed fully either to the book’s material and prose, or to the “coddling of the American mind” (to borrow a phrase from Haidt and Lukianoff) which predisposes readers today to cry wolf at the scent of alterity and burst into flight. The challenge of Radner’s work in both authorial and readerly aspects is a more complex matter. It comprises not merely linguistic and intellectual demands, but obediential and penitential ones. The potential fruits of engaging Radner thus proceed from the superficiality of learning fascinating historical tidbits, to a deeply transformed understanding of the modern Christian predicament, to the utter profundity of divine encounter. Eminent Jewish scholar Peter Ochs once observed, as he commented on one of Radner’s other volumes, that Radner’s text propelled him, in a way that few texts other than the Torah had, to fumble about for his headcovering. Caveat Lector: like Radner’s other volumes, A Profound Ignorance needs to be confronted, wrestled with, lingered over, and accompanied by prayer. There are three aspects of the book’s challenge that demand comment. The first is that, as his “subversive pneumatology,” A Profound Ignorance asks readers to step outside of a particular pneumatological orientation that is now taken for granted in the West. In the twentieth-century, this orientation birthed the contemporary theological discipline of Pneumatology. For Radner, this new birth is not the triumphant overcoming of a primitive binitarianism. It is, rather, the decoupling of the theology of the Holy Spirit from its maternal Christological and ecclesial moorings. As Radner puts it, “the problem of modern Pneumatology is that it seeks to escape the world of flesh and blood which is the body and blood of our Lord” (p. 84). Yet Radner spends little time condemning contemporary culprit theologians, much less naming them. For 952309 PRE0010.1177/1063851220952309Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2020","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ephraim Radner, A Profound Ignorance: Modern Pneumatology and Its Anti-modern Redemption\",\"authors\":\"David Ney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1063851220952309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some readers will complain that A Profound Ignorance is a challenging book. Whatever the challenge, it cannot be attributed fully either to the book’s material and prose, or to the “coddling of the American mind” (to borrow a phrase from Haidt and Lukianoff) which predisposes readers today to cry wolf at the scent of alterity and burst into flight. The challenge of Radner’s work in both authorial and readerly aspects is a more complex matter. It comprises not merely linguistic and intellectual demands, but obediential and penitential ones. The potential fruits of engaging Radner thus proceed from the superficiality of learning fascinating historical tidbits, to a deeply transformed understanding of the modern Christian predicament, to the utter profundity of divine encounter. Eminent Jewish scholar Peter Ochs once observed, as he commented on one of Radner’s other volumes, that Radner’s text propelled him, in a way that few texts other than the Torah had, to fumble about for his headcovering. Caveat Lector: like Radner’s other volumes, A Profound Ignorance needs to be confronted, wrestled with, lingered over, and accompanied by prayer. There are three aspects of the book’s challenge that demand comment. The first is that, as his “subversive pneumatology,” A Profound Ignorance asks readers to step outside of a particular pneumatological orientation that is now taken for granted in the West. In the twentieth-century, this orientation birthed the contemporary theological discipline of Pneumatology. For Radner, this new birth is not the triumphant overcoming of a primitive binitarianism. It is, rather, the decoupling of the theology of the Holy Spirit from its maternal Christological and ecclesial moorings. As Radner puts it, “the problem of modern Pneumatology is that it seeks to escape the world of flesh and blood which is the body and blood of our Lord” (p. 84). Yet Radner spends little time condemning contemporary culprit theologians, much less naming them. For 952309 PRE0010.1177/1063851220952309Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":223812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851220952309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851220952309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有些读者会抱怨《深刻的无知》是一本具有挑战性的书。无论挑战是什么,都不能完全归因于书中的材料和散文,也不能完全归因于“对美国人思想的纵容”(借用海特和卢基亚诺夫的一句话),这种纵容使今天的读者一闻到另类的气味就会喊狼来了,然后逃跑。Radner的作品在作者和读者方面的挑战是一个更复杂的问题。它不仅包括语言和智力的要求,还包括顺从和忏悔的要求。因此,与Radner合作的潜在成果从学习迷人的历史花絮的肤浅,到对现代基督教困境的深刻理解,再到对神圣遭遇的彻底深刻的理解。杰出的犹太学者彼得·奥克斯(Peter Ochs)曾经评论拉德纳的另一卷书时说,拉德纳的文字以一种除了《托拉》(Torah)之外很少有文本能达到的方式,促使他摸索着寻找头巾。警告:就像拉德纳的其他书一样,《深刻的无知》需要面对,挣扎,徘徊,并伴随着祈祷。这本书的挑战有三个方面值得评论。首先,作为他的“颠覆性气体学”,《深刻的无知》要求读者跳出现在在西方被视为理所当然的特定气体学方向。在二十世纪,这个方向诞生了当代神学学科“气体学”。对拉德纳来说,这种新生并不是对原始二元主义的胜利克服。更确切地说,这是圣灵神学与其母性基督论和教会系泊的分离。正如拉德纳所说,“现代肺气学的问题在于,它试图逃避血肉世界,即我们主的身体和血液”(第84页)。然而,拉德纳几乎没有花时间谴责当代的罪人神学家,更不用说指名道姓了。为952309 PRE0010.1177/1063851220952309Pro Ecclesia:天主教和福音派神学杂志书评书评2020
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ephraim Radner, A Profound Ignorance: Modern Pneumatology and Its Anti-modern Redemption
Some readers will complain that A Profound Ignorance is a challenging book. Whatever the challenge, it cannot be attributed fully either to the book’s material and prose, or to the “coddling of the American mind” (to borrow a phrase from Haidt and Lukianoff) which predisposes readers today to cry wolf at the scent of alterity and burst into flight. The challenge of Radner’s work in both authorial and readerly aspects is a more complex matter. It comprises not merely linguistic and intellectual demands, but obediential and penitential ones. The potential fruits of engaging Radner thus proceed from the superficiality of learning fascinating historical tidbits, to a deeply transformed understanding of the modern Christian predicament, to the utter profundity of divine encounter. Eminent Jewish scholar Peter Ochs once observed, as he commented on one of Radner’s other volumes, that Radner’s text propelled him, in a way that few texts other than the Torah had, to fumble about for his headcovering. Caveat Lector: like Radner’s other volumes, A Profound Ignorance needs to be confronted, wrestled with, lingered over, and accompanied by prayer. There are three aspects of the book’s challenge that demand comment. The first is that, as his “subversive pneumatology,” A Profound Ignorance asks readers to step outside of a particular pneumatological orientation that is now taken for granted in the West. In the twentieth-century, this orientation birthed the contemporary theological discipline of Pneumatology. For Radner, this new birth is not the triumphant overcoming of a primitive binitarianism. It is, rather, the decoupling of the theology of the Holy Spirit from its maternal Christological and ecclesial moorings. As Radner puts it, “the problem of modern Pneumatology is that it seeks to escape the world of flesh and blood which is the body and blood of our Lord” (p. 84). Yet Radner spends little time condemning contemporary culprit theologians, much less naming them. For 952309 PRE0010.1177/1063851220952309Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Catholicity and the Catholic Church: Protestant Concerns and (Roman) Catholic Perspectives Supremely Simple Trinity and Contemporary “Natural Theology”: Bonaventure Beyond Jenson and Plotinus Editor’s Note The Grammar of Salvation: The Function of Trinitarian Theology in the Works of Karen Kilby and Robert Jenson Reasons to Say Farewell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1