利用多智能体模拟器研究加州电力危机

T. Sueyoshi, G. R. Tadiparthi, M. Goto
{"title":"利用多智能体模拟器研究加州电力危机","authors":"T. Sueyoshi, G. R. Tadiparthi, M. Goto","doi":"10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the summer (2000), wholesale electricity prices in California were approximately 500% higher than those during the same months in 1998-1999. This study proposes a use of a multi-agent intelligent simulator (MAIS) to numerically examine several reasons regarding why the crisis has occurred during May 2000-Janurary 2001. The MAIS explains the price fluctuation of wholesale electricity during the crisis with estimation accuracy (91.15%). We also find that 40.46% of the price increase was due to an increase in marginal production cost, 17.85% to traderspsila greediness, 5.27% to a real demand change and 3.56% to market power. The remaining 32.86% came from the other unknown components. This result indicates that the price hike has occurred due to an increase in fuel prices and real demand. The two market fundamentals explained 45.73% (= 40.46% + 5.27%) of the price increase. The responsibility of energy firms was 21.41% (= 17.85% + 3.56%). The numerical evidences are different from the very well-known research of Joskow and Kahn (2002), which has attributed the exercise of market power by large energy firms.","PeriodicalId":408691,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A use of multi-agent intelligent simulator to examine California electricity crisis\",\"authors\":\"T. Sueyoshi, G. R. Tadiparthi, M. Goto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the summer (2000), wholesale electricity prices in California were approximately 500% higher than those during the same months in 1998-1999. This study proposes a use of a multi-agent intelligent simulator (MAIS) to numerically examine several reasons regarding why the crisis has occurred during May 2000-Janurary 2001. The MAIS explains the price fluctuation of wholesale electricity during the crisis with estimation accuracy (91.15%). We also find that 40.46% of the price increase was due to an increase in marginal production cost, 17.85% to traderspsila greediness, 5.27% to a real demand change and 3.56% to market power. The remaining 32.86% came from the other unknown components. This result indicates that the price hike has occurred due to an increase in fuel prices and real demand. The two market fundamentals explained 45.73% (= 40.46% + 5.27%) of the price increase. The responsibility of energy firms was 21.41% (= 17.85% + 3.56%). The numerical evidences are different from the very well-known research of Joskow and Kahn (2002), which has attributed the exercise of market power by large energy firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在夏季(2000年),加州的批发电价比1998-1999年同期高出约500%。本研究建议使用多代理智能模拟器(MAIS)对2000年5月至2001年1月期间发生危机的几个原因进行数值分析。MAIS对危机期间批发电力价格波动的解释准确率为91.15%。我们还发现,价格上涨的40.46%是由于边际生产成本的增加,17.85%是由于商人的贪婪,5.27%是由于实际需求的变化,3.56%是由于市场支配力。其余32.86%来自其他未知成分。这一结果表明,价格上涨是由于燃料价格和实际需求的增加而发生的。这两个市场基本因素解释了45.73%(= 40.46% + 5.27%)的价格上涨。能源企业的责任为21.41%(= 17.85% + 3.56%)。数值证据与Joskow和Kahn(2002)的著名研究不同,后者将市场力量的行使归因于大型能源公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A use of multi-agent intelligent simulator to examine California electricity crisis
During the summer (2000), wholesale electricity prices in California were approximately 500% higher than those during the same months in 1998-1999. This study proposes a use of a multi-agent intelligent simulator (MAIS) to numerically examine several reasons regarding why the crisis has occurred during May 2000-Janurary 2001. The MAIS explains the price fluctuation of wholesale electricity during the crisis with estimation accuracy (91.15%). We also find that 40.46% of the price increase was due to an increase in marginal production cost, 17.85% to traderspsila greediness, 5.27% to a real demand change and 3.56% to market power. The remaining 32.86% came from the other unknown components. This result indicates that the price hike has occurred due to an increase in fuel prices and real demand. The two market fundamentals explained 45.73% (= 40.46% + 5.27%) of the price increase. The responsibility of energy firms was 21.41% (= 17.85% + 3.56%). The numerical evidences are different from the very well-known research of Joskow and Kahn (2002), which has attributed the exercise of market power by large energy firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growth, energy technologies and evaluation context of scenarios: methodological considerations illustrated to the Corsican insular region An application of MACRAME to support a multiunit project Operations and supply chain management Patent analysis for technology forecasting: Sector-specific applications New perspectives on industry transformation through expansion of the technology base and creative cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1