常规铸型、激光扫描铸型和口内扫描之间测量的可靠性

Ahmed R. El-kalza, Mohamed I. Mowafy, T. Yousry
{"title":"常规铸型、激光扫描铸型和口内扫描之间测量的可靠性","authors":"Ahmed R. El-kalza, Mohamed I. Mowafy, T. Yousry","doi":"10.21608/EOS.2021.55121.1009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare tooth measurements obtained by two differently acquired digital model and conventional plaster cast measurements. Materials and methods: This study comprised 40 patients. Digital casts were obtained by two methods; Intraoral scanning by carestream intraoral scanner CS3600 powder free and model scanning by cast scanner Sirona InEos X5 scanner. Three study groups were obtained; Group 1: conventional dental casts ,group 2: digital casts obtained with powder free intraoral scanning and group 3: digital casts obtained by cast scanner. Intercanine and intermolar widths in addition to individual tooth measurements were made using Viewbox program for digital casts and digital caliper for the plaster cast. Results: No statistical significant difference between three groups regarding all measurements had been found. Conclusion:The results of this study confirm the potential of intraoral scanning to acquire data as accurate as alginate impressions as well as scanned digital casts for orthodontic applications","PeriodicalId":305086,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of measurements between conventional casts, laser scanned casts and intraoral scanning\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed R. El-kalza, Mohamed I. Mowafy, T. Yousry\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/EOS.2021.55121.1009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to compare tooth measurements obtained by two differently acquired digital model and conventional plaster cast measurements. Materials and methods: This study comprised 40 patients. Digital casts were obtained by two methods; Intraoral scanning by carestream intraoral scanner CS3600 powder free and model scanning by cast scanner Sirona InEos X5 scanner. Three study groups were obtained; Group 1: conventional dental casts ,group 2: digital casts obtained with powder free intraoral scanning and group 3: digital casts obtained by cast scanner. Intercanine and intermolar widths in addition to individual tooth measurements were made using Viewbox program for digital casts and digital caliper for the plaster cast. Results: No statistical significant difference between three groups regarding all measurements had been found. Conclusion:The results of this study confirm the potential of intraoral scanning to acquire data as accurate as alginate impressions as well as scanned digital casts for orthodontic applications\",\"PeriodicalId\":305086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/EOS.2021.55121.1009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/EOS.2021.55121.1009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种不同获得的数字模型和传统石膏模型的牙齿测量结果。材料和方法:本研究纳入40例患者。通过两种方法获得数字模型;口腔内扫描采用carestream无粉口腔内扫描仪CS3600,模型扫描采用Sirona InEos X5扫描仪。分为三个研究组;第1组:常规铸型,第2组:无粉口腔内扫描获得的数字铸型,第3组:铸造扫描仪获得的数字铸型。除了单独的牙齿测量外,还使用Viewbox程序对数字铸型和数字卡尺对石膏铸型进行测量。结果:三组间各项指标均无统计学差异。结论:本研究的结果证实了口腔内扫描的潜力,以获得数据准确的海藻酸盐印模和扫描的数字铸型正畸应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of measurements between conventional casts, laser scanned casts and intraoral scanning
The aim of this study was to compare tooth measurements obtained by two differently acquired digital model and conventional plaster cast measurements. Materials and methods: This study comprised 40 patients. Digital casts were obtained by two methods; Intraoral scanning by carestream intraoral scanner CS3600 powder free and model scanning by cast scanner Sirona InEos X5 scanner. Three study groups were obtained; Group 1: conventional dental casts ,group 2: digital casts obtained with powder free intraoral scanning and group 3: digital casts obtained by cast scanner. Intercanine and intermolar widths in addition to individual tooth measurements were made using Viewbox program for digital casts and digital caliper for the plaster cast. Results: No statistical significant difference between three groups regarding all measurements had been found. Conclusion:The results of this study confirm the potential of intraoral scanning to acquire data as accurate as alginate impressions as well as scanned digital casts for orthodontic applications
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison Of Different Imaging Software For Measuring Volume Of The Maxillary Sinus Splint-Supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device Versus Class II Intermaxillary elastics For The Correction Of Class II Malocclusion ; A Retrospective Study Effect Of White Spot Lesion Pretreatment With Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared To Diode Laser On The Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontic Brackets. An In-Vitro Study Association Of Soft Tissue Facial Form & Dental Arch Form: A Cross Sectional Comparative Study Association Of Molar Angulation With Anterior Crowding And Dental Inclinations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1