“它需要比面对面更好”:将illumination引入社会科学远程学习计划

D. Middleton, Donna Smith
{"title":"“它需要比面对面更好”:将illumination引入社会科学远程学习计划","authors":"D. Middleton, Donna Smith","doi":"10.11120/elss.2013.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Online synchronous tuition has the potential to enhance the study experience of students who cannot attend face-to-face tutorials, or where there are no face-to-face tutorials available. This could be particularly beneficial for students of online and distance institutions, such as the Open University, who may otherwise feel disconnected from the study experience. One such synchronous technology, Elluminate, has been introduced in the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Open University over the last few years, with feedback suggesting that the students who take part have a very positive experience. This paper explores the views of students and tutors from the Faculty of Social Sciences, Open University, about Elluminate, concluding that Elluminate tutorials are not better, nor worse, than face-to-face-tutorials – they are simply different. By setting up one method of teaching as a gold standard, all be it a standard with very little evidence supporting it, the debate is reduced to “can online learning do what face-to-face learning does, to the detriment of students and their teachers?” We note that feedback from students and tutors suggests a reluctance to embrace new technology among tutors that is not mirrored by students. While some tutors may not be comfortable with technological innovation, we argue that sensitive and subject-driven training can increase both the confidence and perception of tutors.","PeriodicalId":147930,"journal":{"name":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“It Needs to be Better than Face-to-Face”: Introducing Elluminate into a Social Sciences Distance Learning Programme\",\"authors\":\"D. Middleton, Donna Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.11120/elss.2013.00016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Online synchronous tuition has the potential to enhance the study experience of students who cannot attend face-to-face tutorials, or where there are no face-to-face tutorials available. This could be particularly beneficial for students of online and distance institutions, such as the Open University, who may otherwise feel disconnected from the study experience. One such synchronous technology, Elluminate, has been introduced in the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Open University over the last few years, with feedback suggesting that the students who take part have a very positive experience. This paper explores the views of students and tutors from the Faculty of Social Sciences, Open University, about Elluminate, concluding that Elluminate tutorials are not better, nor worse, than face-to-face-tutorials – they are simply different. By setting up one method of teaching as a gold standard, all be it a standard with very little evidence supporting it, the debate is reduced to “can online learning do what face-to-face learning does, to the detriment of students and their teachers?” We note that feedback from students and tutors suggests a reluctance to embrace new technology among tutors that is not mirrored by students. While some tutors may not be comfortable with technological innovation, we argue that sensitive and subject-driven training can increase both the confidence and perception of tutors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2013.00016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2013.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在线同步教学有潜力提高学生的学习经验,谁不能参加面对面的教程,或没有面对面的教程可用。这对在线和远程教育机构(如开放大学)的学生尤其有益,否则他们可能会感到与学习体验脱节。过去几年,英国开放大学(Open University)社会科学学院引进了一种名为“发光”(lumininate)的同步技术,反馈表明,参与这项技术的学生获得了非常积极的体验。本文探讨了开放大学社会科学学院的学生和导师对课堂教学的看法,得出结论:课堂教学并不比面对面教学更好,也不差——它们只是不同而已。通过建立一种教学方法作为黄金标准,尽管它是一个几乎没有证据支持的标准,辩论就变成了“在线学习能做到面对面学习所能做到的,对学生和老师不利吗?”我们注意到,来自学生和导师的反馈表明,导师不愿接受新技术,而学生却没有反映出这一点。虽然有些导师可能对技术创新感到不舒服,但我们认为敏感和主题驱动的培训可以增加导师的信心和感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“It Needs to be Better than Face-to-Face”: Introducing Elluminate into a Social Sciences Distance Learning Programme
Abstract Online synchronous tuition has the potential to enhance the study experience of students who cannot attend face-to-face tutorials, or where there are no face-to-face tutorials available. This could be particularly beneficial for students of online and distance institutions, such as the Open University, who may otherwise feel disconnected from the study experience. One such synchronous technology, Elluminate, has been introduced in the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Open University over the last few years, with feedback suggesting that the students who take part have a very positive experience. This paper explores the views of students and tutors from the Faculty of Social Sciences, Open University, about Elluminate, concluding that Elluminate tutorials are not better, nor worse, than face-to-face-tutorials – they are simply different. By setting up one method of teaching as a gold standard, all be it a standard with very little evidence supporting it, the debate is reduced to “can online learning do what face-to-face learning does, to the detriment of students and their teachers?” We note that feedback from students and tutors suggests a reluctance to embrace new technology among tutors that is not mirrored by students. While some tutors may not be comfortable with technological innovation, we argue that sensitive and subject-driven training can increase both the confidence and perception of tutors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Impact of an Industry-Centred Activity on Student Learning Making it Work: Widening Participation in Higher Education for Adults in Employment Transforming Pedagogy and Experience through e-Learning in Teacher Education Introducing the Complete Case Study into an Australian Undergraduate Sociology Major ‘A Picture Is Worth 10,000 Words’: A Module to Test the ‘Visualization Hypothesis’ in Quantitative Methods Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1