{"title":"优化三角网格压缩使用预测树","authors":"Boris Kronrod, C. Gotsman","doi":"10.1109/PCCGA.2000.883968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, a wealth of algorithms for the efficient coding of 3D triangle meshes have been published. All these focus on achieving the most compact code for the connectivity data. The geometric data, i.e. the vertex coordinates, are then coded in an order induced by the connectivity code, which is probably not optimal. This is a pity, as the geometric portion of the data set dominates the code. We propose a way to optimize the geometry code without sacrificing too much in the connectivity code. In our approach, we achieve approximately two bits/triangle for the connectivity before entropy coding, which is not as good as other published algorithms but certainly not significantly worse. Our approach is based on the parallelogram prediction method for mesh geometry. This method is based on the observation that two adjacent triangles in a typical mesh tend to form a shape similar to a parallelogram. If an algorithm uses a parallelogram prediction method then it should build a traversal structure of triangles covering all vertices. The vertex coordinates are then predicted as the structure is traversed. The cost of this code is then the entropy of the distribution of the vertex prediction errors. Since this entropy is hard to manipulate, the accepted practice is to measure the code's effectiveness in the approximation sense, i.e. as the sum of the lengths of the vertex prediction error vectors. The full version of this paper is available at .","PeriodicalId":342067,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings the Eighth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized triangle mesh compression using prediction trees\",\"authors\":\"Boris Kronrod, C. Gotsman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PCCGA.2000.883968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, a wealth of algorithms for the efficient coding of 3D triangle meshes have been published. All these focus on achieving the most compact code for the connectivity data. The geometric data, i.e. the vertex coordinates, are then coded in an order induced by the connectivity code, which is probably not optimal. This is a pity, as the geometric portion of the data set dominates the code. We propose a way to optimize the geometry code without sacrificing too much in the connectivity code. In our approach, we achieve approximately two bits/triangle for the connectivity before entropy coding, which is not as good as other published algorithms but certainly not significantly worse. Our approach is based on the parallelogram prediction method for mesh geometry. This method is based on the observation that two adjacent triangles in a typical mesh tend to form a shape similar to a parallelogram. If an algorithm uses a parallelogram prediction method then it should build a traversal structure of triangles covering all vertices. The vertex coordinates are then predicted as the structure is traversed. The cost of this code is then the entropy of the distribution of the vertex prediction errors. Since this entropy is hard to manipulate, the accepted practice is to measure the code's effectiveness in the approximation sense, i.e. as the sum of the lengths of the vertex prediction error vectors. The full version of this paper is available at .\",\"PeriodicalId\":342067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings the Eighth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings the Eighth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCGA.2000.883968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings the Eighth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCGA.2000.883968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimized triangle mesh compression using prediction trees
Recently, a wealth of algorithms for the efficient coding of 3D triangle meshes have been published. All these focus on achieving the most compact code for the connectivity data. The geometric data, i.e. the vertex coordinates, are then coded in an order induced by the connectivity code, which is probably not optimal. This is a pity, as the geometric portion of the data set dominates the code. We propose a way to optimize the geometry code without sacrificing too much in the connectivity code. In our approach, we achieve approximately two bits/triangle for the connectivity before entropy coding, which is not as good as other published algorithms but certainly not significantly worse. Our approach is based on the parallelogram prediction method for mesh geometry. This method is based on the observation that two adjacent triangles in a typical mesh tend to form a shape similar to a parallelogram. If an algorithm uses a parallelogram prediction method then it should build a traversal structure of triangles covering all vertices. The vertex coordinates are then predicted as the structure is traversed. The cost of this code is then the entropy of the distribution of the vertex prediction errors. Since this entropy is hard to manipulate, the accepted practice is to measure the code's effectiveness in the approximation sense, i.e. as the sum of the lengths of the vertex prediction error vectors. The full version of this paper is available at .