美国北卡罗莱纳州U19男子橄榄球联盟“激活计划”第一个赛季的实际观察结果,以减少受伤风险

C. Hughes
{"title":"美国北卡罗莱纳州U19男子橄榄球联盟“激活计划”第一个赛季的实际观察结果,以减少受伤风险","authors":"C. Hughes","doi":"10.29011/2576-9596.100035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We implemented an adapted version of the “Activate Programme” for our U19 men’s rugby team for the 2018 season. Since we had systematically documented all injuries that led to missed time from training or match play for all players in the 2017 (before) and 2018 (after) seasons, I compared the descriptive data regarding our team’s experience with injuries. These observational data suggest that the Activate Programme may have contributed to our lower number of injuries in the latter of the two seasons. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 Commentary Text In youth sports, especially contact sports, adult leaders including parents, coaches and officials bear the responsibility for implementing processes that can minimize the risk of injuries while preserving the benefits of participation. In the sport of rugby, there is an appropriate high level of concern about the risk of concussions and other injuries [1] and the sport has taken strong stances at all levels to inform players, parents, coaches, referees and all other authorities in the sport about recognition, removal from play and strict guidelines about return to play after any concussive injury. From a coach’s perspective, reduction of risk of injury of all types including concussions depends upon thorough coaching of proper techniques especially those related to tackling, rucking and scrummaging. Additionally, player fitness, adherence to the laws of the game and the ethos of respect for the opponent are also factors that plausibly reduce the risks of injuries during practices and matches. As the injury registrar and a Back’s Coach (USA Rugby Level 200) for our U19 Chapel Hill Highlanders men’s team, I have used the commercially available injury tracking system “Injure Free” [http://www.injurefree.com/] for the last two seasons (2017 & 2018) to document all observed and reported injuries by players during our preseason training intervals (NOV 2016-JAN 2017 and NOV 2017-JAN 2018) and competitive seasons (FEBMAY 2017 and FEB-MAY 2018). This injury-tracking system also allows documentation of compliance with return-to-play protocols consistent with good medical practices and the requirements of USA Rugby. Between the 2017 competitive season and the beginning of the preseason training in NOV 2017 (for the 2018 competitive season), I became aware of the new “Activate Programme” http://www. englandrugby.com/rugbysafe/activate/] developed by investigators at the University of Bath with support of the Rugby Football Union (RFU) in England [2,3]. After careful consideration of the potential benefits, we instituted an adapted version of the Activate Programme from the RFU/SRU in early NOV 2017 in the preseason for the 2018 season and progressed it across our 2018 season. Our team competes as a U19 “High school” team in the USA, so we have players spanning four grade-levels with ages 15-18 years. To address this age range, with a season duration that does not match that in the UK, and with the Activate Phases available from the RFU as of OCT 2017, I empirically chose to adapt the programme as follows with approximate durations of each phase: From the RFU Activate Program [http://www.englandrugby. com/rugbysafe/activate/] Citation: Hughes C (2018) Real-World Observations from a First Season of the Rugby Union “Activate Programme” for Injury Risk Reduction in a U19 Men’s Team in North Carolina, USA. Sports Injr Med: JSIMD-135. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 2 Volume 2018; Issue 01 Sports Injr Med, an open access journal ISSN: 2576-9596 U15 Phase 1: 2 weeks • U15 Phase 2: 2 weeks • U16 Phase 1: 2 weeks • U16 Phase 2: 2 weeks • U17/18 Phase 1: 3 weeks • U17/18 Phase 2: 3 weeks • And then from the SRU Rugby Right Activate Phases 1-5 [http://www.scottishrugby.org/rugbyright-activate-warm-routine] Rugby Right Activate Phase 2: 4 weeks • Rugby Right Activate Phase 3: 6 weeks (end of season) • Compliance with the respective phase of the Activate warmup routine was required of all players at our two or three practices per week and before all matches. The players initially reacted to the new routines with a certain degree of silly disdain. They were repeatedly told that this was a data-based approach to reduce their individual and collective risk of injuries, and to reduce their chances of missing playing time due to injury. Over time, and as the Activate routines became more intense, the jesting dissipated and the focus on the work at hand solidified. After completion of the 2018 season, I retrieved the 2017 and 2018 data from our Injure Free Account Table 1 and have considered the extent to which these results of the team’s documented injuries might provide some insights, whether reassuring or worrisome. As these are only uncontrolled “observational data,” it would not be scientifically rigorous to claim that a cause and effect relationship between use of the Activate Programme and our incidence of injuries can be concluded. Nonetheless, all human health and safety research projects must move into a “real-world” setting to have any broad public health benefit, and observations and experiences in that setting are ultimately essential to acceptance or rejection of any new practice(s). With these limitations outside of a carefully designed research study and with admittedly modest numbers of players and rather few events, I am nonetheless willing to say that I think these observational data suggest that the Activate Programme may have contributed to our lower number of injuries leading to missed training and playing time in the latter of the two seasons. Season 2017 2018 Players on active roster 31 36 Total Injuries that led to missed training or match play 18 injuries in 14 players 9 injures in 8 players Concussion* 6 2 Contusion 1 (foot) 0 Fracture 0 1 (hand) Laceration 0 1 (eyebrow) Shoulder “Stinger” 0 2 Sprain 4 (1 wrist; 3 ankle) 2 (ankle) Strain 7 (3 back; 4 lower extremity) 1 (lower extremity) * No player experienced more than 1 concussion in either or both seasons. Table 1: Roster Size and Injuries in 2017 and 2018. These data can be considered a quasi-experimental design in that “treatment” allocation is not random [4]; nevertheless, as is often the case with medical studies [4] where the impact of an intervention leads to a comparison of “before” and “after,” it seems reasonable to assess the data with a statistical tool. I chose to apply the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare the numbers of injuries in the two seasons. For total injures comparing 2017 to 2018; • Sum of ranks for Group 1 is 1238.5, for n= 31; Sum of ranks for Group 2 is 1039.5, for n= 36 Value of U statistic is 373.5; z score is 2.320067; z critical (5%, two-tailed) is 1.959964 and p value is 0.020337. For concussions only comparing 2017 to 2018; • Sum of ranks for Group 1 is 1168, for n = 31; Sum of ranks for Group 2 is 1247, for n = 38 Value of U statistic is 672; z score is 1.001260; z critical (5%, twotailed) is 1.959964 and p value is 0.316701. Although these data do NOT represent a concurrent, doubleblind, randomized placebo or standard regimen-controlled trial, I have considered whether these descriptive data offer at least Citation: Hughes C (2018) Real-World Observations from a First Season of the Rugby Union “Activate Programme” for Injury Risk Reduction in a U19 Men’s Team in North Carolina, USA. Sports Injr Med: JSIMD-135. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 3 Volume 2018; Issue 01 Sports Injr Med, an open access journal ISSN: 2576-9596 some plausible reason to choose to continue use of the Activate Programme in future seasons. Did we see any suggestion of apparent harm in 2018? No. Did we see any suggestion of apparent benefit (risk reduction) in 2018? Seemingly, yes. Some understandable concerns have been recently raised about broad adoption of this programme in the sport of rugby for youth [5]. I wish to suggest that our modest limited experience with our U19 men’s team in North Carolina, USA appears to suggest benefit in terms of improved player safety and we shall continue use of the Activate Programme for our 2019 season.","PeriodicalId":186403,"journal":{"name":"Sports Injuries & Medicine","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Observations from a First Season of the Rugby Union “Activate Programme” for Injury Risk Reduction in a U19 Men’s Team in North Carolina, USA\",\"authors\":\"C. Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2576-9596.100035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We implemented an adapted version of the “Activate Programme” for our U19 men’s rugby team for the 2018 season. Since we had systematically documented all injuries that led to missed time from training or match play for all players in the 2017 (before) and 2018 (after) seasons, I compared the descriptive data regarding our team’s experience with injuries. These observational data suggest that the Activate Programme may have contributed to our lower number of injuries in the latter of the two seasons. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 Commentary Text In youth sports, especially contact sports, adult leaders including parents, coaches and officials bear the responsibility for implementing processes that can minimize the risk of injuries while preserving the benefits of participation. In the sport of rugby, there is an appropriate high level of concern about the risk of concussions and other injuries [1] and the sport has taken strong stances at all levels to inform players, parents, coaches, referees and all other authorities in the sport about recognition, removal from play and strict guidelines about return to play after any concussive injury. From a coach’s perspective, reduction of risk of injury of all types including concussions depends upon thorough coaching of proper techniques especially those related to tackling, rucking and scrummaging. Additionally, player fitness, adherence to the laws of the game and the ethos of respect for the opponent are also factors that plausibly reduce the risks of injuries during practices and matches. As the injury registrar and a Back’s Coach (USA Rugby Level 200) for our U19 Chapel Hill Highlanders men’s team, I have used the commercially available injury tracking system “Injure Free” [http://www.injurefree.com/] for the last two seasons (2017 & 2018) to document all observed and reported injuries by players during our preseason training intervals (NOV 2016-JAN 2017 and NOV 2017-JAN 2018) and competitive seasons (FEBMAY 2017 and FEB-MAY 2018). This injury-tracking system also allows documentation of compliance with return-to-play protocols consistent with good medical practices and the requirements of USA Rugby. Between the 2017 competitive season and the beginning of the preseason training in NOV 2017 (for the 2018 competitive season), I became aware of the new “Activate Programme” http://www. englandrugby.com/rugbysafe/activate/] developed by investigators at the University of Bath with support of the Rugby Football Union (RFU) in England [2,3]. After careful consideration of the potential benefits, we instituted an adapted version of the Activate Programme from the RFU/SRU in early NOV 2017 in the preseason for the 2018 season and progressed it across our 2018 season. Our team competes as a U19 “High school” team in the USA, so we have players spanning four grade-levels with ages 15-18 years. To address this age range, with a season duration that does not match that in the UK, and with the Activate Phases available from the RFU as of OCT 2017, I empirically chose to adapt the programme as follows with approximate durations of each phase: From the RFU Activate Program [http://www.englandrugby. com/rugbysafe/activate/] Citation: Hughes C (2018) Real-World Observations from a First Season of the Rugby Union “Activate Programme” for Injury Risk Reduction in a U19 Men’s Team in North Carolina, USA. Sports Injr Med: JSIMD-135. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 2 Volume 2018; Issue 01 Sports Injr Med, an open access journal ISSN: 2576-9596 U15 Phase 1: 2 weeks • U15 Phase 2: 2 weeks • U16 Phase 1: 2 weeks • U16 Phase 2: 2 weeks • U17/18 Phase 1: 3 weeks • U17/18 Phase 2: 3 weeks • And then from the SRU Rugby Right Activate Phases 1-5 [http://www.scottishrugby.org/rugbyright-activate-warm-routine] Rugby Right Activate Phase 2: 4 weeks • Rugby Right Activate Phase 3: 6 weeks (end of season) • Compliance with the respective phase of the Activate warmup routine was required of all players at our two or three practices per week and before all matches. The players initially reacted to the new routines with a certain degree of silly disdain. They were repeatedly told that this was a data-based approach to reduce their individual and collective risk of injuries, and to reduce their chances of missing playing time due to injury. Over time, and as the Activate routines became more intense, the jesting dissipated and the focus on the work at hand solidified. After completion of the 2018 season, I retrieved the 2017 and 2018 data from our Injure Free Account Table 1 and have considered the extent to which these results of the team’s documented injuries might provide some insights, whether reassuring or worrisome. As these are only uncontrolled “observational data,” it would not be scientifically rigorous to claim that a cause and effect relationship between use of the Activate Programme and our incidence of injuries can be concluded. Nonetheless, all human health and safety research projects must move into a “real-world” setting to have any broad public health benefit, and observations and experiences in that setting are ultimately essential to acceptance or rejection of any new practice(s). With these limitations outside of a carefully designed research study and with admittedly modest numbers of players and rather few events, I am nonetheless willing to say that I think these observational data suggest that the Activate Programme may have contributed to our lower number of injuries leading to missed training and playing time in the latter of the two seasons. Season 2017 2018 Players on active roster 31 36 Total Injuries that led to missed training or match play 18 injuries in 14 players 9 injures in 8 players Concussion* 6 2 Contusion 1 (foot) 0 Fracture 0 1 (hand) Laceration 0 1 (eyebrow) Shoulder “Stinger” 0 2 Sprain 4 (1 wrist; 3 ankle) 2 (ankle) Strain 7 (3 back; 4 lower extremity) 1 (lower extremity) * No player experienced more than 1 concussion in either or both seasons. Table 1: Roster Size and Injuries in 2017 and 2018. These data can be considered a quasi-experimental design in that “treatment” allocation is not random [4]; nevertheless, as is often the case with medical studies [4] where the impact of an intervention leads to a comparison of “before” and “after,” it seems reasonable to assess the data with a statistical tool. I chose to apply the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare the numbers of injuries in the two seasons. For total injures comparing 2017 to 2018; • Sum of ranks for Group 1 is 1238.5, for n= 31; Sum of ranks for Group 2 is 1039.5, for n= 36 Value of U statistic is 373.5; z score is 2.320067; z critical (5%, two-tailed) is 1.959964 and p value is 0.020337. For concussions only comparing 2017 to 2018; • Sum of ranks for Group 1 is 1168, for n = 31; Sum of ranks for Group 2 is 1247, for n = 38 Value of U statistic is 672; z score is 1.001260; z critical (5%, twotailed) is 1.959964 and p value is 0.316701. Although these data do NOT represent a concurrent, doubleblind, randomized placebo or standard regimen-controlled trial, I have considered whether these descriptive data offer at least Citation: Hughes C (2018) Real-World Observations from a First Season of the Rugby Union “Activate Programme” for Injury Risk Reduction in a U19 Men’s Team in North Carolina, USA. Sports Injr Med: JSIMD-135. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 3 Volume 2018; Issue 01 Sports Injr Med, an open access journal ISSN: 2576-9596 some plausible reason to choose to continue use of the Activate Programme in future seasons. Did we see any suggestion of apparent harm in 2018? No. Did we see any suggestion of apparent benefit (risk reduction) in 2018? Seemingly, yes. Some understandable concerns have been recently raised about broad adoption of this programme in the sport of rugby for youth [5]. I wish to suggest that our modest limited experience with our U19 men’s team in North Carolina, USA appears to suggest benefit in terms of improved player safety and we shall continue use of the Activate Programme for our 2019 season.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Injuries & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Injuries & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2576-9596.100035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Injuries & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2576-9596.100035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在2018赛季为U19男子橄榄球队实施了一个改编版本的“激活计划”。由于我们系统地记录了2017年(赛前)和2018年(赛后)赛季中所有球员因伤缺席训练或比赛的所有情况,所以我比较了关于我们球队受伤经历的描述性数据。这些观察数据表明,激活计划可能有助于我们在两个赛季的后半部分减少受伤人数。2576 - 9596 . DOI: 10.29011 /。在青少年体育运动中,特别是身体接触运动中,包括父母、教练和官员在内的成年领导者有责任实施能够最大限度地减少受伤风险,同时保持参与的好处的过程。在橄榄球运动中,人们对脑震荡和其他伤害的风险有着适当的高度关注[1],这项运动在各个层面都采取了强硬的立场,告知球员、家长、教练、裁判和这项运动的所有其他当局,关于任何脑震荡损伤后的识别、移除和严格的重返比赛指导。从教练的角度来看,减少包括脑震荡在内的各种伤害的风险取决于对适当技术的全面指导,特别是那些与铲球、冲撞和乱抢有关的技术。此外,球员的健康、对比赛规则的遵守以及尊重对手的精神也是在训练和比赛中减少受伤风险的因素。作为我们U19 Chapel Hill Highlanders男子队的伤病登记员和背部教练(美国橄榄球200级),我在过去两个赛季(2017年和2018年)使用了市售的伤病跟踪系统“Injure Free”[http://www.injurefree.com/]来记录我们季前赛训练间隔(2016年11月至2017年1月和2017年11月至2018年1月)和比赛赛季(2017年2月至5月和2018年2月至5月)期间所有观察到的和报告的伤病。这种伤害跟踪系统还允许遵守与良好医疗实践和美国橄榄球要求一致的重返比赛协议的文件。在2017赛季和2017年11月(2018赛季)的季前赛训练开始之间,我意识到新的“激活计划”http://www。englandrugby.com/rugbysafe/activate/]由巴斯大学的研究人员在英国橄榄球联盟(RFU)的支持下开发[2,3]。在仔细考虑了潜在的好处之后,我们于2017年11月初在2018赛季的季前赛中制定了RFU/SRU激活计划的改编版本,并在整个2018赛季中进行了推广。我们的球队在美国参加U19“高中”队的比赛,所以我们的球员跨越了四个年级,年龄在15-18岁之间。为了解决这个年龄段的问题,由于赛季持续时间与英国不匹配,并且截至2017年10月RFU可以提供激活阶段,我根据经验选择调整计划如下,每个阶段的大致持续时间:来自RFU激活计划[http://www.englandrugby]。引用:Hughes C(2018)在美国北卡罗莱纳州U19男子橄榄球联盟“激活计划”的第一个赛季的真实世界观察,以降低受伤风险。运动医学:JSIMD-135。2576 - 9596 . DOI: 10.29011 /。100035 2卷2018;01体育Injr医疗问题,开放获取期刊ISSN: 2576 - 9596年U15阶段1:2周•U15阶段2:2周•U16阶段1:2周•U16阶段2:2周•U17/18阶段1:3周•U17/18阶段2:3周•然后从蒸发器橄榄球激活阶段1 - 5 [http://www.scottishrugby.org/rugbyright-activate-warm-routine]橄榄球正确激活第二阶段:4周•橄榄球正确激活阶段3:6周(赛季结束)•在所有比赛之前,我们要求所有球员在每周两到三次训练中遵守相应阶段的激活热身程序。球员们最初对新套路的反应是某种程度的愚蠢的蔑视。他们被反复告知,这是一种基于数据的方法,以减少他们个人和集体受伤的风险,并减少他们因伤缺阵的机会。随着时间的推移,随着激活程序变得越来越激烈,玩笑逐渐消失,注意力集中在手头的工作上。在2018赛季结束后,我从我们的无伤害账户表1中检索了2017年和2018年的数据,并考虑了这些球队记录的伤病结果在多大程度上可能提供一些见解,是令人安心还是令人担忧。由于这些只是未经控制的“观察数据”,因此,声称可以得出使用激活计划与我们的受伤发生率之间的因果关系的结论在科学上并不严谨。 尽管如此,所有人类健康和安全研究项目必须进入“现实世界”环境,才能产生广泛的公共卫生效益,而在该环境中的观察和经验最终对接受或拒绝任何新做法至关重要。考虑到精心设计的研究之外的这些局限性,以及无可否认的适度的球员数量和相当少的事件,我仍然愿意说,我认为这些观察数据表明,激活计划可能有助于我们在两个赛季的后两个赛季中减少因错过训练和比赛时间而受伤的人数。2017 - 2018赛季现役球员总数31 36人导致错过训练或比赛的伤病总数14人18伤8人9伤脑震荡* 6 2挫伤1(脚)0骨折01(手)撕裂伤01(眉毛)肩膀“刺痛”0 2扭伤4(1手腕;2(脚踝)扭伤7(背部);没有球员在任何一个赛季或两个赛季中经历过一次以上的脑震荡。表1:2017年和2018年的名单规模和伤病情况。这些数据可以被认为是准实验设计,因为“治疗”分配不是随机的[4];然而,正如医学研究[4]中经常出现的情况一样,干预的影响导致“之前”和“之后”的比较,用统计工具评估数据似乎是合理的。我选择应用非参数Mann-Whitney U检验来比较两个赛季的伤病数量。2017年和2018年的总受伤人数比较;•第1组的排名总和为1238.5,n= 31;第2组的秩和为1039.5,对于n= 36, U统计量的值为373.5;Z值为2.320067;Z临界值(5%,双尾)为1.959964,p值为0.020337。仅比较2017年和2018年的脑震荡;•第1组的排名总和为1168,n = 31;第2组的秩和为1247,对于n = 38, U统计量的值为672;Z值为1.001260;Z临界值(5%,双尾)为1.959964,p值为0.316701。尽管这些数据并不代表并行、双盲、随机安慰剂或标准方案对照试验,但我考虑了这些描述性数据是否至少提供了引文:Hughes C(2018),来自美国北卡罗莱纳州U19男子球队橄榄球联盟“激活计划”第一赛季的真实世界观察。运动医学:JSIMD-135。2576 - 9596 . DOI: 10.29011 /。100035 3卷2018;第01期《体育医学》,一份开放获取期刊,ISSN: 2576-9596,一些合理的理由选择在未来的季节继续使用激活计划。我们在2018年有没有看到任何明显的伤害迹象?不。我们在2018年有没有看到任何明显的好处(风险降低)?似乎,是的。最近,在青少年橄榄球运动中广泛采用这一方案引发了一些可以理解的担忧[5]。我想建议的是,我们在美国北卡罗来纳州U19男子球队的有限经验似乎表明,在提高球员安全方面,我们将在2019赛季继续使用激活计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-World Observations from a First Season of the Rugby Union “Activate Programme” for Injury Risk Reduction in a U19 Men’s Team in North Carolina, USA
We implemented an adapted version of the “Activate Programme” for our U19 men’s rugby team for the 2018 season. Since we had systematically documented all injuries that led to missed time from training or match play for all players in the 2017 (before) and 2018 (after) seasons, I compared the descriptive data regarding our team’s experience with injuries. These observational data suggest that the Activate Programme may have contributed to our lower number of injuries in the latter of the two seasons. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 Commentary Text In youth sports, especially contact sports, adult leaders including parents, coaches and officials bear the responsibility for implementing processes that can minimize the risk of injuries while preserving the benefits of participation. In the sport of rugby, there is an appropriate high level of concern about the risk of concussions and other injuries [1] and the sport has taken strong stances at all levels to inform players, parents, coaches, referees and all other authorities in the sport about recognition, removal from play and strict guidelines about return to play after any concussive injury. From a coach’s perspective, reduction of risk of injury of all types including concussions depends upon thorough coaching of proper techniques especially those related to tackling, rucking and scrummaging. Additionally, player fitness, adherence to the laws of the game and the ethos of respect for the opponent are also factors that plausibly reduce the risks of injuries during practices and matches. As the injury registrar and a Back’s Coach (USA Rugby Level 200) for our U19 Chapel Hill Highlanders men’s team, I have used the commercially available injury tracking system “Injure Free” [http://www.injurefree.com/] for the last two seasons (2017 & 2018) to document all observed and reported injuries by players during our preseason training intervals (NOV 2016-JAN 2017 and NOV 2017-JAN 2018) and competitive seasons (FEBMAY 2017 and FEB-MAY 2018). This injury-tracking system also allows documentation of compliance with return-to-play protocols consistent with good medical practices and the requirements of USA Rugby. Between the 2017 competitive season and the beginning of the preseason training in NOV 2017 (for the 2018 competitive season), I became aware of the new “Activate Programme” http://www. englandrugby.com/rugbysafe/activate/] developed by investigators at the University of Bath with support of the Rugby Football Union (RFU) in England [2,3]. After careful consideration of the potential benefits, we instituted an adapted version of the Activate Programme from the RFU/SRU in early NOV 2017 in the preseason for the 2018 season and progressed it across our 2018 season. Our team competes as a U19 “High school” team in the USA, so we have players spanning four grade-levels with ages 15-18 years. To address this age range, with a season duration that does not match that in the UK, and with the Activate Phases available from the RFU as of OCT 2017, I empirically chose to adapt the programme as follows with approximate durations of each phase: From the RFU Activate Program [http://www.englandrugby. com/rugbysafe/activate/] Citation: Hughes C (2018) Real-World Observations from a First Season of the Rugby Union “Activate Programme” for Injury Risk Reduction in a U19 Men’s Team in North Carolina, USA. Sports Injr Med: JSIMD-135. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 2 Volume 2018; Issue 01 Sports Injr Med, an open access journal ISSN: 2576-9596 U15 Phase 1: 2 weeks • U15 Phase 2: 2 weeks • U16 Phase 1: 2 weeks • U16 Phase 2: 2 weeks • U17/18 Phase 1: 3 weeks • U17/18 Phase 2: 3 weeks • And then from the SRU Rugby Right Activate Phases 1-5 [http://www.scottishrugby.org/rugbyright-activate-warm-routine] Rugby Right Activate Phase 2: 4 weeks • Rugby Right Activate Phase 3: 6 weeks (end of season) • Compliance with the respective phase of the Activate warmup routine was required of all players at our two or three practices per week and before all matches. The players initially reacted to the new routines with a certain degree of silly disdain. They were repeatedly told that this was a data-based approach to reduce their individual and collective risk of injuries, and to reduce their chances of missing playing time due to injury. Over time, and as the Activate routines became more intense, the jesting dissipated and the focus on the work at hand solidified. After completion of the 2018 season, I retrieved the 2017 and 2018 data from our Injure Free Account Table 1 and have considered the extent to which these results of the team’s documented injuries might provide some insights, whether reassuring or worrisome. As these are only uncontrolled “observational data,” it would not be scientifically rigorous to claim that a cause and effect relationship between use of the Activate Programme and our incidence of injuries can be concluded. Nonetheless, all human health and safety research projects must move into a “real-world” setting to have any broad public health benefit, and observations and experiences in that setting are ultimately essential to acceptance or rejection of any new practice(s). With these limitations outside of a carefully designed research study and with admittedly modest numbers of players and rather few events, I am nonetheless willing to say that I think these observational data suggest that the Activate Programme may have contributed to our lower number of injuries leading to missed training and playing time in the latter of the two seasons. Season 2017 2018 Players on active roster 31 36 Total Injuries that led to missed training or match play 18 injuries in 14 players 9 injures in 8 players Concussion* 6 2 Contusion 1 (foot) 0 Fracture 0 1 (hand) Laceration 0 1 (eyebrow) Shoulder “Stinger” 0 2 Sprain 4 (1 wrist; 3 ankle) 2 (ankle) Strain 7 (3 back; 4 lower extremity) 1 (lower extremity) * No player experienced more than 1 concussion in either or both seasons. Table 1: Roster Size and Injuries in 2017 and 2018. These data can be considered a quasi-experimental design in that “treatment” allocation is not random [4]; nevertheless, as is often the case with medical studies [4] where the impact of an intervention leads to a comparison of “before” and “after,” it seems reasonable to assess the data with a statistical tool. I chose to apply the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare the numbers of injuries in the two seasons. For total injures comparing 2017 to 2018; • Sum of ranks for Group 1 is 1238.5, for n= 31; Sum of ranks for Group 2 is 1039.5, for n= 36 Value of U statistic is 373.5; z score is 2.320067; z critical (5%, two-tailed) is 1.959964 and p value is 0.020337. For concussions only comparing 2017 to 2018; • Sum of ranks for Group 1 is 1168, for n = 31; Sum of ranks for Group 2 is 1247, for n = 38 Value of U statistic is 672; z score is 1.001260; z critical (5%, twotailed) is 1.959964 and p value is 0.316701. Although these data do NOT represent a concurrent, doubleblind, randomized placebo or standard regimen-controlled trial, I have considered whether these descriptive data offer at least Citation: Hughes C (2018) Real-World Observations from a First Season of the Rugby Union “Activate Programme” for Injury Risk Reduction in a U19 Men’s Team in North Carolina, USA. Sports Injr Med: JSIMD-135. DOI: 10.29011/2576-9596. 100035 3 Volume 2018; Issue 01 Sports Injr Med, an open access journal ISSN: 2576-9596 some plausible reason to choose to continue use of the Activate Programme in future seasons. Did we see any suggestion of apparent harm in 2018? No. Did we see any suggestion of apparent benefit (risk reduction) in 2018? Seemingly, yes. Some understandable concerns have been recently raised about broad adoption of this programme in the sport of rugby for youth [5]. I wish to suggest that our modest limited experience with our U19 men’s team in North Carolina, USA appears to suggest benefit in terms of improved player safety and we shall continue use of the Activate Programme for our 2019 season.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stature and Its Estimation Utilizing Length of Hand Measurements of Both Gender Adolescents from Western region of Kosovo Cannabidiol (CBD) in the Management of Sports-Related Traumatic Brain Injury: Research and Efficacy Plication of The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament for The Treatment of Chronic Patella Dislocations and Refractory Patellofemoral Syndrome. A Retrospective Case Series and Review Injury Rate in Beach Handball – Comparison Between Two Tournaments of the European Beach Tour (EBT) Long-Term Effects of ACL Transection on the Gastrocnemius Muscle in Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1