{"title":"当外交抗议还不够时","authors":"S. W. Becker","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the interplay between the rule of specialty, prudential standing, and diplomatic protests in current US international extradition practice through examining the controversial decisions of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of United States v. Valencia-Trujillo regarding which the Republic of Colombia has issued no less than three diplomatic notes of objection. To date, the Eleventh Circuit’s direct appeal decision in Valencia-Trujillo remains the most extreme holding in the country and has created a direct conflict with other federal circuits. The work further analyzes competing theories on the rule of specialty and whether its enforcement is dependent upon the nature of the extradition, as well as issues related to ineffective assistance of counsel. Finally, the chapter concludes with practical advice for attorneys litigating such complex matters.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Diplomatic Protests Are Not Enough\",\"authors\":\"S. W. Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter addresses the interplay between the rule of specialty, prudential standing, and diplomatic protests in current US international extradition practice through examining the controversial decisions of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of United States v. Valencia-Trujillo regarding which the Republic of Colombia has issued no less than three diplomatic notes of objection. To date, the Eleventh Circuit’s direct appeal decision in Valencia-Trujillo remains the most extreme holding in the country and has created a direct conflict with other federal circuits. The work further analyzes competing theories on the rule of specialty and whether its enforcement is dependent upon the nature of the extradition, as well as issues related to ineffective assistance of counsel. Finally, the chapter concludes with practical advice for attorneys litigating such complex matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章通过审查第十一巡回上诉法院在美国诉巴伦西亚-特鲁希略一案中有争议的判决,阐述了美国现行国际引渡实践中专业规则、审慎地位和外交抗议之间的相互作用,哥伦比亚共和国就该案件发出了不少于三份反对外交照会。迄今为止,第十一巡回上诉法院对瓦伦西亚-特鲁希略案的直接上诉裁决仍然是美国最极端的裁决,并与其他联邦巡回上诉法院产生了直接冲突。本工作进一步分析了关于专业规则的相互竞争的理论,以及该规则的执行是否取决于引渡的性质,并分析了与律师无效协助有关的问题。最后,本章总结了对律师诉讼此类复杂事项的实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When Diplomatic Protests Are Not Enough
This chapter addresses the interplay between the rule of specialty, prudential standing, and diplomatic protests in current US international extradition practice through examining the controversial decisions of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of United States v. Valencia-Trujillo regarding which the Republic of Colombia has issued no less than three diplomatic notes of objection. To date, the Eleventh Circuit’s direct appeal decision in Valencia-Trujillo remains the most extreme holding in the country and has created a direct conflict with other federal circuits. The work further analyzes competing theories on the rule of specialty and whether its enforcement is dependent upon the nature of the extradition, as well as issues related to ineffective assistance of counsel. Finally, the chapter concludes with practical advice for attorneys litigating such complex matters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
China’s “Belt and Road Initiative”: A Research Study of a Multifaceted Policy From Pandemic to Apocalypse—Nuclear War as Terminal Disease Appendix of the Part—Topics Covered in the Previous Issues (2008–2019) Introductory Note Introductory Note
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1