Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0012
G. Dutfield, U. Suthersanen
This chapter concerns food fraud, including what it is, what is being done to counter it, and what we might do to counter it better. The concept of food fraud has tended to be overshadowed by other food-related terms like food security and food safety. Nowadays, food inauthenticity is not just about the content of what we are eating. The ways that food can be inauthentic has increased, encompassing where it comes from and how it is produced. The more information a product carries, the greater the opportunities for deceit. Non-product-related production and process methods are of as much interest to many consumers as what they are made of, as is product origin. We claim that geographical indications (GI) as signs promoting club goods may be helpful as a means of countering certain forms of food fraud, and as such forms one of this chapter’s original contributions to the food fraud literature. Although GI-protected products like Champagne and Scotch whisky are of course traded around the world, the way that they exalt localness and non-industrial production may be important in the present context. One socio-economic matter requiring further reflection is that quality and authenticity indicators, even as their usage expands, still tend to be associated with niche products and those that are more than averagely expensive. However, in the long term, a turn to localism, which GIs represent and promote, will most likely benefit all consumers, rich and poor.
{"title":"Responding to the Global Food Fraud Crisis","authors":"G. Dutfield, U. Suthersanen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0012","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter concerns food fraud, including what it is, what is being done to counter it, and what we might do to counter it better. The concept of food fraud has tended to be overshadowed by other food-related terms like food security and food safety. Nowadays, food inauthenticity is not just about the content of what we are eating. The ways that food can be inauthentic has increased, encompassing where it comes from and how it is produced. The more information a product carries, the greater the opportunities for deceit. Non-product-related production and process methods are of as much interest to many consumers as what they are made of, as is product origin. We claim that geographical indications (GI) as signs promoting club goods may be helpful as a means of countering certain forms of food fraud, and as such forms one of this chapter’s original contributions to the food fraud literature. Although GI-protected products like Champagne and Scotch whisky are of course traded around the world, the way that they exalt localness and non-industrial production may be important in the present context. One socio-economic matter requiring further reflection is that quality and authenticity indicators, even as their usage expands, still tend to be associated with niche products and those that are more than averagely expensive. However, in the long term, a turn to localism, which GIs represent and promote, will most likely benefit all consumers, rich and poor.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"513 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123429313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0040
Antonio Tizzano
The introductory note describes the main developments of 2019 with regard to the functioning and the organization of the Court of Justice of the European Union, as well as to its case law. The Court of Justice and the General Court were confronted with many delicate legal questions pertaining to all aspects of EU law. Amongst others, the EU courts had to address issues raised by the threats to values inherent in the rule of law, by the increasing interferences with fundamental rights, such as the right to privacy, and by the so-called “migration crisis.” The introductory note provides an overview of the most important judgments that were delivered in 2019, in an array of legal domains, including the rules on the relationship between member states and EU institutions, rights and obligations of third country migrants, fundamental rights, rules of competition and state aid, data protection, and external relations of the European Union.
{"title":"Introductory Note","authors":"Antonio Tizzano","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0040","url":null,"abstract":"The introductory note describes the main developments of 2019 with regard to the functioning and the organization of the Court of Justice of the European Union, as well as to its case law. The Court of Justice and the General Court were confronted with many delicate legal questions pertaining to all aspects of EU law. Amongst others, the EU courts had to address issues raised by the threats to values inherent in the rule of law, by the increasing interferences with fundamental rights, such as the right to privacy, and by the so-called “migration crisis.” The introductory note provides an overview of the most important judgments that were delivered in 2019, in an array of legal domains, including the rules on the relationship between member states and EU institutions, rights and obligations of third country migrants, fundamental rights, rules of competition and state aid, data protection, and external relations of the European Union.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123021948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0002
R. Falk
This chapter rejects the view that the anti-aggression norm affirmed by the Pact of Paris, the Nuremberg Judgment, and the UN Charter “remade the world” in a manner that reduced the relevance of intergovernmental wars to the conduct of international relations. It argues that geopolitical primacy of dominant states persists, which has rendered impotent the anti-aggression norm, and related efforts to impose individual criminal accountability in war/peace contexts. The unfortunate result is that international warfare has remained integral to the Westphalian framework of world order. For this reason, the anti-aggression norm has not had a transformative impact, but has led to a variety of accommodating developments, such as “impunity,” “victor’s justice,” and “double standards.” Only transnational civil society initiatives, such as peoples’ tribunals, take the anti-aggression norm and the guidance of the Nuremberg Principles in a manner that aspires to remake the world. Such a dramatic overcoming of war seems to depend on a movement from below, not reforms from above by governments or through the United Nations.
{"title":"The Unresolved Struggle for International Criminal Accountability","authors":"R. Falk","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter rejects the view that the anti-aggression norm affirmed by the Pact of Paris, the Nuremberg Judgment, and the UN Charter “remade the world” in a manner that reduced the relevance of intergovernmental wars to the conduct of international relations. It argues that geopolitical primacy of dominant states persists, which has rendered impotent the anti-aggression norm, and related efforts to impose individual criminal accountability in war/peace contexts. The unfortunate result is that international warfare has remained integral to the Westphalian framework of world order. For this reason, the anti-aggression norm has not had a transformative impact, but has led to a variety of accommodating developments, such as “impunity,” “victor’s justice,” and “double standards.” Only transnational civil society initiatives, such as peoples’ tribunals, take the anti-aggression norm and the guidance of the Nuremberg Principles in a manner that aspires to remake the world. Such a dramatic overcoming of war seems to depend on a movement from below, not reforms from above by governments or through the United Nations.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125497386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0003
E. Petersmann
Claims of “judicial overreach” currently disrupt the World Trade Organization (WTO), investor-state arbitration, and multilevel judicial governance in the European Union. Section II discusses the postwar evolution from the neo-liberal “Washington consensus” to the ordo-liberal “Geneva consensus” promoting global human rights, multilateral trading systems and transnational rule of law based on UN/WTO law. The neoliberal US assault on WTO law and adjudication (discussed in Section III) and China’s totalitarian state-capitalism (Section IV) challenge multilateral treaty systems and related adjudication protecting global public goods. The claims of “judicial overreach” in multilateral trade, investment and European adjudication (discussed in Section V) reveal systemic conflicts among regulatory and judicial approaches. Section VI concludes that EU law requires defending the “constitutional functions” of ordo-liberal integration law through EU leadership for plurilateral WTO reforms; economic, environmental, and human rights litigation in Europe confirm the need for participatory governance in multilevel legal and judicial protection of the UN/WTO sustainable development goals.
{"title":"From Integration Through Law to Global Community Law?","authors":"E. Petersmann","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"Claims of “judicial overreach” currently disrupt the World Trade Organization (WTO), investor-state arbitration, and multilevel judicial governance in the European Union. Section II discusses the postwar evolution from the neo-liberal “Washington consensus” to the ordo-liberal “Geneva consensus” promoting global human rights, multilateral trading systems and transnational rule of law based on UN/WTO law. The neoliberal US assault on WTO law and adjudication (discussed in Section III) and China’s totalitarian state-capitalism (Section IV) challenge multilateral treaty systems and related adjudication protecting global public goods. The claims of “judicial overreach” in multilateral trade, investment and European adjudication (discussed in Section V) reveal systemic conflicts among regulatory and judicial approaches. Section VI concludes that EU law requires defending the “constitutional functions” of ordo-liberal integration law through EU leadership for plurilateral WTO reforms; economic, environmental, and human rights litigation in Europe confirm the need for participatory governance in multilevel legal and judicial protection of the UN/WTO sustainable development goals.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134333945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0026
J. Gomuła
In 2019 WTO panel and Appellate Body reports were adopted in ten disputes. They involved an unusually broad scope of WTO agreements, going well beyond the “usual” challenges to trade remedy measures. One of the highlights in 2019 was the conclusion of the long-lasting tuna/dolphin dispute, with the United States being deemed to having fully implemented the original rulings by modifying its “dolphin safe” labelling scheme. The other compliance proceedings, both relating to the SCM Agreement, were not as successful, with unresolved issues remaining: the implementation by the United States of the Boeing subsidies rulings and the still murky boundaries for a state-owned company to become a “public body.” The 2019 disputes also involved the WTO consistency of sanitary measures taken by Korea in the aftermath of the Fukushima power plant disaster, a seven-programme tax regime adopted by Brazil, and transit restrictions adopted by Russia for national security reasons. The latter was the first WTO dispute dealing with Article XXI of GATT 1994. Although 2019 was an active year in terms of adopted Appellate Body reports, at the end of the year the composition of the Appellate Body was reduced to one member only.
{"title":"Introductory Note","authors":"J. Gomuła","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0026","url":null,"abstract":"In 2019 WTO panel and Appellate Body reports were adopted in ten disputes. They involved an unusually broad scope of WTO agreements, going well beyond the “usual” challenges to trade remedy measures. One of the highlights in 2019 was the conclusion of the long-lasting tuna/dolphin dispute, with the United States being deemed to having fully implemented the original rulings by modifying its “dolphin safe” labelling scheme. The other compliance proceedings, both relating to the SCM Agreement, were not as successful, with unresolved issues remaining: the implementation by the United States of the Boeing subsidies rulings and the still murky boundaries for a state-owned company to become a “public body.” The 2019 disputes also involved the WTO consistency of sanitary measures taken by Korea in the aftermath of the Fukushima power plant disaster, a seven-programme tax regime adopted by Brazil, and transit restrictions adopted by Russia for national security reasons. The latter was the first WTO dispute dealing with Article XXI of GATT 1994. Although 2019 was an active year in terms of adopted Appellate Body reports, at the end of the year the composition of the Appellate Body was reduced to one member only.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117073088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0006
C. Botrugno
Contemporary healthcare systems are going through the digital turn, i.e., the progressive incorporation of information and communication technologies to improve the quality and increase the efficiency of healthcare. Despite the flourishing of research in this field, just a small number of studies have shed light on the most relevant legal issues posed by the implementation of digital services in healthcare. This literature shows a predilection for some issues among which data protection, confidentiality, licensure, and liability. What is missing is a more comprehensive reflection that may help to assess the overall impact of digitalisation on the right to health, ranging from the emergence of new rights to the reconfiguration of existing ones. This chapter is an attempt to contribute to the aforementioned reflection, which is deemed fundamental in order to protect disadvantaged groups, and to ensure effectiveness of both emerging and existing entitlements conventionally considered as part of an individual’s right to health.
{"title":"Working on a Right to Health for the Digital Era","authors":"C. Botrugno","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary healthcare systems are going through the digital turn, i.e., the progressive incorporation of information and communication technologies to improve the quality and increase the efficiency of healthcare. Despite the flourishing of research in this field, just a small number of studies have shed light on the most relevant legal issues posed by the implementation of digital services in healthcare. This literature shows a predilection for some issues among which data protection, confidentiality, licensure, and liability. What is missing is a more comprehensive reflection that may help to assess the overall impact of digitalisation on the right to health, ranging from the emergence of new rights to the reconfiguration of existing ones. This chapter is an attempt to contribute to the aforementioned reflection, which is deemed fundamental in order to protect disadvantaged groups, and to ensure effectiveness of both emerging and existing entitlements conventionally considered as part of an individual’s right to health.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124927460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0013
Guiguo Wang
The outburst and rapid worldwide spread of the COVID-19 pandemic have become the single greatest challenges to humankind today. The adverse impact of the pandemic on the world economy and social order raises the question of whether the existing international public health order is capable of meeting the needs of humankind facing serious infectious diseases like the COVID-19 pandemic. The WHO-led international public health order was formulated at the end of the Second World War and reflected the culture, tradition, and perception of security of Western countries. Stimulated by the process of globalization, national states’ perception of sovereignty, human rights, and interdependence has undergone profound changes. By the very nature of public health, it is closely related to trade and intellectual property, which encouraged and enabled the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization, and the World Intellectual Property Organization to cooperate closely. Hand in hand with the ever deepening of globalization, public health has become a genuine and important international issue drawing collaboration of many international organizations and ad hoc bodies such as the G20. “There are sure to be bad years following the movement of great armies.” The current international public health order has revealed certain weaknesses and shortcomings that require actions. The system is bound to be reviewed and reformed, which must take into account the interests, cultures, and traditions of the developing countries in the context of global collaboration.
{"title":"Globalization and Post–COVID-19 Public Health Order","authors":"Guiguo Wang","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0013","url":null,"abstract":"The outburst and rapid worldwide spread of the COVID-19 pandemic have become the single greatest challenges to humankind today. The adverse impact of the pandemic on the world economy and social order raises the question of whether the existing international public health order is capable of meeting the needs of humankind facing serious infectious diseases like the COVID-19 pandemic. The WHO-led international public health order was formulated at the end of the Second World War and reflected the culture, tradition, and perception of security of Western countries. Stimulated by the process of globalization, national states’ perception of sovereignty, human rights, and interdependence has undergone profound changes. By the very nature of public health, it is closely related to trade and intellectual property, which encouraged and enabled the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization, and the World Intellectual Property Organization to cooperate closely. Hand in hand with the ever deepening of globalization, public health has become a genuine and important international issue drawing collaboration of many international organizations and ad hoc bodies such as the G20. “There are sure to be bad years following the movement of great armies.” The current international public health order has revealed certain weaknesses and shortcomings that require actions. The system is bound to be reviewed and reformed, which must take into account the interests, cultures, and traditions of the developing countries in the context of global collaboration.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126215883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0001
Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo
The twentieth anniversary of the Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence is a cause for celebration. This editorial introduction traces the history of the Yearbook from its debut in 2001 and its subsequent evolution to the present day. A presentation of the Yearbook’s intellectual trajectory, as developed from its original roots, shows important differences across time but also intriguing prospects for an annual publication that aims for relevancy and impact at the very forefront of events in law, politics, ethics, and jurisprudence in a global society. Our anniversary is a time to reflect on how the Yearbook and its interdisciplinary context have developed in synergy by looking back at some of the changes we made and, at the same time, to strategize for the future. In particular, we plan to shift the focus in response to the unfortunate conjuncture of the current crisis in global governance, the decline of global organizations, and the revival of nationalism.
{"title":"Facing the Crisis of Global Governance—GCYILJ’s Twentieth Anniversary at the Intersection of Continuity and Dynamic Progress","authors":"Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"The twentieth anniversary of the Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence is a cause for celebration. This editorial introduction traces the history of the Yearbook from its debut in 2001 and its subsequent evolution to the present day. A presentation of the Yearbook’s intellectual trajectory, as developed from its original roots, shows important differences across time but also intriguing prospects for an annual publication that aims for relevancy and impact at the very forefront of events in law, politics, ethics, and jurisprudence in a global society. Our anniversary is a time to reflect on how the Yearbook and its interdisciplinary context have developed in synergy by looking back at some of the changes we made and, at the same time, to strategize for the future. In particular, we plan to shift the focus in response to the unfortunate conjuncture of the current crisis in global governance, the decline of global organizations, and the revival of nationalism.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132086202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0079
F. Seatzu
In 2019, the international administrative tribunals saw a number of significant developments in their handling of complex and perennial issues. Reference is made in this chapter, in particular, to the Nasir and the L. (No. 6) cases, where, respectively, the UN Dispute Tribunal and the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization delivered two noteworthy judgments on procedural and substantive issues of primary importance such as the doctrine of acquired (or vested) rights and the doctrine of res judicata. In the FC case, a decision was handed down by the World Bank Administrative Tribunal (WABT), which addressed issues involving the standards and burden of proof indispensable for ascertaining the existence of sexual harassment at the workplace. Here the WABT took a novel and more “guarantistic” approach for the applicant’s role and interests when it stated that “[i]n cases of sexual harassment where direct evidence is difficult to obtain, circumstantial evidence such as accounts to third parties at the time of the events in question becomes especially important.”
{"title":"Introductory Note","authors":"F. Seatzu","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0079","url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, the international administrative tribunals saw a number of significant developments in their handling of complex and perennial issues. Reference is made in this chapter, in particular, to the Nasir and the L. (No. 6) cases, where, respectively, the UN Dispute Tribunal and the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization delivered two noteworthy judgments on procedural and substantive issues of primary importance such as the doctrine of acquired (or vested) rights and the doctrine of res judicata. In the FC case, a decision was handed down by the World Bank Administrative Tribunal (WABT), which addressed issues involving the standards and burden of proof indispensable for ascertaining the existence of sexual harassment at the workplace. Here the WABT took a novel and more “guarantistic” approach for the applicant’s role and interests when it stated that “[i]n cases of sexual harassment where direct evidence is difficult to obtain, circumstantial evidence such as accounts to third parties at the time of the events in question becomes especially important.”","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121377074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0015
Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo
Beginning with the 2008 issue, the Yearbook includes this part that aims to explore the emerging global policies (and the norms implementing them) in various sectors of public activity and their increasing importance in building a global law. Our goal is to cover the majority of areas of public activity most affected by global policies and to group under various headings homogeneous contributions to give an overall picture of the development of global law....
{"title":"Appendix of the Part—Topics Covered in the Previous Issues (2008–2019)","authors":"Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0015","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Beginning with the 2008 issue, the Yearbook includes this part that aims to explore the emerging global policies (and the norms implementing them) in various sectors of public activity and their increasing importance in building a global law.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Our goal is to cover the majority of areas of public activity most affected by global policies and to group under various headings homogeneous contributions to give an overall picture of the development of global law....\u0000","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116761834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：