为什么南斯拉夫解体了?有决定性的答案吗?

Aleksandar Pavković
{"title":"为什么南斯拉夫解体了?有决定性的答案吗?","authors":"Aleksandar Pavković","doi":"10.1080/1461319042000296831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yugoslavia, the State which Withered Away: The Rise, Crisis and Fall of Kardelj’s Yugoslavia (1974–1990), I shall argue, offers a very well-argued and coherent explanation of the political processes that led to Yugoslavia’s disintegration but not a conclusive answer to our question. The book—published in the same language both in Zagreb and in Belgrade—tells the story of a failed attempt to impose the Marxist conception of the withering away of the state to a multinational society of former Yugoslavia. According to the doctrine elaborated by Edvard Kardelj, Tito’s second in command, the state, during the socialist transition, should, in all of its non-coercive functions, be replaced by associations of workers who were referred to as ‘self-managing (or free) producers’. The two founding legal documents embodying this doctrine, the Yugoslav federal Constitution of 1974 and the Law on Associated Labour (1976) generated more than 5 million laws and regulations which were supposed to govern all aspects of public life in former Yugoslavia, both at the workplace and in the more traditional political sphere. More importantly, as Dejan Jović argues, this doctrine of socialist self-management shaped the ideological outlook of the Yugoslav communist elites well until the effective dissolution of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia (the Yugoslav Communist Party), at its last and aborted extraordinary congress in January 1990. But the book offers not only a story of a failed communist experiment, but also an explanation of the disintegration of the federal Yugoslav state. Its author, in the first chapter, examines and partially rejects eight competing explanations of the disintegration each of which postulate one of the following as the dominant or decisive causal factor in the disintegration: the economic crisis, ancient hatreds among the peoples of Yugoslavia, nationalism/nationalist ideologies, cultural differences among the peoples of Yugoslavia, changes in international politics (the end of the cold war), the role of individual political","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why did Yugoslavia disintegrate? Is there a conclusive answer?\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandar Pavković\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1461319042000296831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Yugoslavia, the State which Withered Away: The Rise, Crisis and Fall of Kardelj’s Yugoslavia (1974–1990), I shall argue, offers a very well-argued and coherent explanation of the political processes that led to Yugoslavia’s disintegration but not a conclusive answer to our question. The book—published in the same language both in Zagreb and in Belgrade—tells the story of a failed attempt to impose the Marxist conception of the withering away of the state to a multinational society of former Yugoslavia. According to the doctrine elaborated by Edvard Kardelj, Tito’s second in command, the state, during the socialist transition, should, in all of its non-coercive functions, be replaced by associations of workers who were referred to as ‘self-managing (or free) producers’. The two founding legal documents embodying this doctrine, the Yugoslav federal Constitution of 1974 and the Law on Associated Labour (1976) generated more than 5 million laws and regulations which were supposed to govern all aspects of public life in former Yugoslavia, both at the workplace and in the more traditional political sphere. More importantly, as Dejan Jović argues, this doctrine of socialist self-management shaped the ideological outlook of the Yugoslav communist elites well until the effective dissolution of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia (the Yugoslav Communist Party), at its last and aborted extraordinary congress in January 1990. But the book offers not only a story of a failed communist experiment, but also an explanation of the disintegration of the federal Yugoslav state. Its author, in the first chapter, examines and partially rejects eight competing explanations of the disintegration each of which postulate one of the following as the dominant or decisive causal factor in the disintegration: the economic crisis, ancient hatreds among the peoples of Yugoslavia, nationalism/nationalist ideologies, cultural differences among the peoples of Yugoslavia, changes in international politics (the end of the cold war), the role of individual political\",\"PeriodicalId\":313717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461319042000296831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461319042000296831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我认为,《衰亡的南斯拉夫:卡德尔南斯拉夫的崛起、危机和衰落》(1974-1990)对导致南斯拉夫解体的政治过程提供了一个论证充分、条理清晰的解释,但并没有对我们的问题给出一个结论性的答案。这本书在萨格勒布和贝尔格莱德以同一种语言出版,讲述了一个失败的故事,试图将马克思主义关于国家消亡的概念强加给前南斯拉夫的多民族社会。根据铁托的副手爱德华·卡德尔(Edvard Kardelj)所阐述的理论,在社会主义转型期间,国家在其所有非强制性职能中,都应该由被称为“自我管理(或自由)生产者”的工人协会所取代。体现这一学说的两份奠基性法律文件,即1974年《南斯拉夫联邦宪法》和《联合劳动法》(1976年)产生了500多万项法律和条例,这些法律和条例本应管理前南斯拉夫公共生活的所有方面,包括工作场所和更传统的政治领域。更重要的是,正如德扬·约维奇所言,这种社会主义自我管理的学说塑造了南斯拉夫共产主义精英的意识形态观,直到1990年1月南斯拉夫共产党联盟(南斯拉夫共产党)在其最后一次并流产的特别代表大会上有效解散。但这本书不仅讲述了一个失败的共产主义实验的故事,还解释了南斯拉夫联邦国家的解体。在第一章中,作者考察并部分驳斥了关于南斯拉夫解体的八种相互竞争的解释,每一种解释都假定下列因素之一是导致南斯拉夫解体的主要或决定性因素:经济危机、南斯拉夫各族人民之间的古老仇恨、民族主义/民族主义意识形态、南斯拉夫各族人民之间的文化差异、国际政治的变化(冷战的结束)、个人政治的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why did Yugoslavia disintegrate? Is there a conclusive answer?
Yugoslavia, the State which Withered Away: The Rise, Crisis and Fall of Kardelj’s Yugoslavia (1974–1990), I shall argue, offers a very well-argued and coherent explanation of the political processes that led to Yugoslavia’s disintegration but not a conclusive answer to our question. The book—published in the same language both in Zagreb and in Belgrade—tells the story of a failed attempt to impose the Marxist conception of the withering away of the state to a multinational society of former Yugoslavia. According to the doctrine elaborated by Edvard Kardelj, Tito’s second in command, the state, during the socialist transition, should, in all of its non-coercive functions, be replaced by associations of workers who were referred to as ‘self-managing (or free) producers’. The two founding legal documents embodying this doctrine, the Yugoslav federal Constitution of 1974 and the Law on Associated Labour (1976) generated more than 5 million laws and regulations which were supposed to govern all aspects of public life in former Yugoslavia, both at the workplace and in the more traditional political sphere. More importantly, as Dejan Jović argues, this doctrine of socialist self-management shaped the ideological outlook of the Yugoslav communist elites well until the effective dissolution of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia (the Yugoslav Communist Party), at its last and aborted extraordinary congress in January 1990. But the book offers not only a story of a failed communist experiment, but also an explanation of the disintegration of the federal Yugoslav state. Its author, in the first chapter, examines and partially rejects eight competing explanations of the disintegration each of which postulate one of the following as the dominant or decisive causal factor in the disintegration: the economic crisis, ancient hatreds among the peoples of Yugoslavia, nationalism/nationalist ideologies, cultural differences among the peoples of Yugoslavia, changes in international politics (the end of the cold war), the role of individual political
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1