一种新的统一机器人平台的评估:尸体研究

N. Lonjon, G. Cavalié, J. Sledge, M. Boudissa
{"title":"一种新的统一机器人平台的评估:尸体研究","authors":"N. Lonjon, G. Cavalié, J. Sledge, M. Boudissa","doi":"10.29007/v4g5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Spine Cobot System (eCential Robotics, France) is a new platform which unifies 2D/3D imaging, navigation and a robotic arm. The intent is to increase patient and surgeon safety without adding time or complexity to the surgical workflow. The primary endpoint of this cadaveric trial is to assess the precision and safety of pedicular screw positioning. The secondary endpoint is to confirm the system’s usability by the operative team. The Spine Cobot System is composed of a C-arm, a station which includes the software, an infrared camera and a collaborative robotic arm (cobot). Screw placement and neural safety were assessed. Precision of screw placement was determined by comparing the final 3D acquisition to the surgeon’s planned trajectory. Safety was quantified by 3 blinded surgeons using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Additionally, the usability of the integrated system for spine surgery was assessed. A system evaluation was performed in compliance with international standards (IEC, FDA). Three experienced surgeons placed 90 pedicular screws in 3 prone cadavers. 100% (90/90) of the screws were accurately placed according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. 97% (87/90) were classified as Grade 0 and 3% (3/90) as Grade 1. The average pilot hole middle point distance deviation is 1.3mm±0.88 mm. The average pilot hole angular deviation is 0.6°±0.6°. Only 2 usability errors were observed during the workflow assessment, and none was critical for patient safety. This preliminary study shows the efficiency of the system for pedicular screw placement, with precision and safety results. This confirms the functionality of a unified system for usability and effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":385854,"journal":{"name":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a New Unified Robotic Platform: a Cadaver Study\",\"authors\":\"N. Lonjon, G. Cavalié, J. Sledge, M. Boudissa\",\"doi\":\"10.29007/v4g5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Spine Cobot System (eCential Robotics, France) is a new platform which unifies 2D/3D imaging, navigation and a robotic arm. The intent is to increase patient and surgeon safety without adding time or complexity to the surgical workflow. The primary endpoint of this cadaveric trial is to assess the precision and safety of pedicular screw positioning. The secondary endpoint is to confirm the system’s usability by the operative team. The Spine Cobot System is composed of a C-arm, a station which includes the software, an infrared camera and a collaborative robotic arm (cobot). Screw placement and neural safety were assessed. Precision of screw placement was determined by comparing the final 3D acquisition to the surgeon’s planned trajectory. Safety was quantified by 3 blinded surgeons using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Additionally, the usability of the integrated system for spine surgery was assessed. A system evaluation was performed in compliance with international standards (IEC, FDA). Three experienced surgeons placed 90 pedicular screws in 3 prone cadavers. 100% (90/90) of the screws were accurately placed according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. 97% (87/90) were classified as Grade 0 and 3% (3/90) as Grade 1. The average pilot hole middle point distance deviation is 1.3mm±0.88 mm. The average pilot hole angular deviation is 0.6°±0.6°. Only 2 usability errors were observed during the workflow assessment, and none was critical for patient safety. This preliminary study shows the efficiency of the system for pedicular screw placement, with precision and safety results. This confirms the functionality of a unified system for usability and effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPiC Series in Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPiC Series in Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29007/v4g5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/v4g5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Spine协作机器人系统(eCential Robotics公司,法国)是一个集2D/3D成像、导航和机械臂于一体的新平台。目的是在不增加手术工作流程的时间或复杂性的情况下提高患者和外科医生的安全性。该尸体试验的主要目的是评估椎弓根螺钉定位的准确性和安全性。次要终点是由操作团队确认系统的可用性。Spine Cobot系统由一个c形臂、一个包含软件的工作站、一个红外摄像机和一个协作机械臂(Cobot)组成。评估螺钉置入和神经安全性。通过将最终的3D采集与外科医生计划的轨迹进行比较,确定螺钉放置的精度。安全性由3位盲法外科医生采用Gertzbein-Robbins分级进行量化。此外,评估了脊柱外科综合系统的可用性。按照国际标准(IEC, FDA)对系统进行了评估。三位经验丰富的外科医生在3具俯卧的尸体上放置了90枚椎弓根螺钉。100%(90/90)的螺钉按照Gertzbein-Robbins分类准确放置。97%(87/90)为0级,3%(3/90)为1级。导孔中点距离平均偏差为1.3mm±0.88 mm。平均导孔角偏差为0.6°±0.6°。在工作流程评估期间,仅观察到2个可用性错误,并且没有一个对患者安全至关重要。本初步研究显示该系统用于椎弓根螺钉置入的有效性,结果精确且安全。这证实了统一系统在可用性和有效性方面的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a New Unified Robotic Platform: a Cadaver Study
The Spine Cobot System (eCential Robotics, France) is a new platform which unifies 2D/3D imaging, navigation and a robotic arm. The intent is to increase patient and surgeon safety without adding time or complexity to the surgical workflow. The primary endpoint of this cadaveric trial is to assess the precision and safety of pedicular screw positioning. The secondary endpoint is to confirm the system’s usability by the operative team. The Spine Cobot System is composed of a C-arm, a station which includes the software, an infrared camera and a collaborative robotic arm (cobot). Screw placement and neural safety were assessed. Precision of screw placement was determined by comparing the final 3D acquisition to the surgeon’s planned trajectory. Safety was quantified by 3 blinded surgeons using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Additionally, the usability of the integrated system for spine surgery was assessed. A system evaluation was performed in compliance with international standards (IEC, FDA). Three experienced surgeons placed 90 pedicular screws in 3 prone cadavers. 100% (90/90) of the screws were accurately placed according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. 97% (87/90) were classified as Grade 0 and 3% (3/90) as Grade 1. The average pilot hole middle point distance deviation is 1.3mm±0.88 mm. The average pilot hole angular deviation is 0.6°±0.6°. Only 2 usability errors were observed during the workflow assessment, and none was critical for patient safety. This preliminary study shows the efficiency of the system for pedicular screw placement, with precision and safety results. This confirms the functionality of a unified system for usability and effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does your approach matter ? Surgeon vs. semi-automated software measured assessment of glenoid retroversion Accuracy Evaluation of Image-Based Virtual Fixtures in Robotic Laminectomy Cloud-Based Three-Dimensional Pattern Analysis and Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures – A Feasibility Study Automated analysis of morpho-functional interbone parameters of the knee based on three dimensional (3D) surface data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1