在波士顿机制下提交优惠的时间安排

Li Chen
{"title":"在波士顿机制下提交优惠的时间安排","authors":"Li Chen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3017156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exam scores are often the main criteria of students’ priorities in college admissions. Depending on the timing of preference submissions relative to the knowledge of scores, students have various degrees of information about their own priorities. I study three widely used timings under the Boston mechanism. The results suggest first, timing that is associated with less information about priorities yields higher expected utility ex-ante; Second, timing with full information about priorities generates full sorting on scores, whereas timing with less information reduces the tension of such sorting.","PeriodicalId":232169,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of Preference Submissions Under the Boston Mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Li Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3017156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exam scores are often the main criteria of students’ priorities in college admissions. Depending on the timing of preference submissions relative to the knowledge of scores, students have various degrees of information about their own priorities. I study three widely used timings under the Boston mechanism. The results suggest first, timing that is associated with less information about priorities yields higher expected utility ex-ante; Second, timing with full information about priorities generates full sorting on scores, whereas timing with less information reduces the tension of such sorting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3017156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3017156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在大学录取中,考试成绩往往是学生优先考虑的主要标准。根据相对于分数知识的偏好提交时间,学生对自己的优先级有不同程度的信息。我研究了波士顿机制下三种广泛使用的计时方法。结果表明,首先,与优先级信息较少相关的时间产生更高的预期事前效用;其次,关于优先级的完整信息的计时会产生对分数的完整排序,而信息较少的计时会减少这种排序的紧张感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Timing of Preference Submissions Under the Boston Mechanism
Exam scores are often the main criteria of students’ priorities in college admissions. Depending on the timing of preference submissions relative to the knowledge of scores, students have various degrees of information about their own priorities. I study three widely used timings under the Boston mechanism. The results suggest first, timing that is associated with less information about priorities yields higher expected utility ex-ante; Second, timing with full information about priorities generates full sorting on scores, whereas timing with less information reduces the tension of such sorting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Value of Public Information When Not Everyone is Privately Informed Hype Cycles: Dynamic Information Design with Two Audiences A Mechanism and Matching in a Social Dilemma The quasi-sorting equilibrium and incentive effects in parallel contests with multiple types of players Competition and Selection in Credit Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1