{"title":"亲斯拉夫主义者论俄罗斯认同边界建构中的“内”与“外”关系","authors":"M. Shirokova","doi":"10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-3-102-114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the philosophy of classical Slavophilism, which the author considers as the first conception of Russian national identity, which reached the generalizations of the philosophical level. Self-identification of a people, as well as person, presupposes an understanding of their own characteristics in relation to “others”. The Slavophilеs viewed the West as the “Significant Other”. For the Slavophiles, one of the most important markers allowing to define the boundaries of the Russian identity was the antithesis of “internal” and “external”. Comparing her position with the one of the modern European researcher K. J. Mier, the author analyzes the use of this antithesis in Slavophil anthropology.","PeriodicalId":240316,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Journal of Philosophy","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slavophiles on the Relationship between “Internal” and “External” in the Construction of the Boundaries of Russian Identity\",\"authors\":\"M. Shirokova\",\"doi\":\"10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-3-102-114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the philosophy of classical Slavophilism, which the author considers as the first conception of Russian national identity, which reached the generalizations of the philosophical level. Self-identification of a people, as well as person, presupposes an understanding of their own characteristics in relation to “others”. The Slavophilеs viewed the West as the “Significant Other”. For the Slavophiles, one of the most important markers allowing to define the boundaries of the Russian identity was the antithesis of “internal” and “external”. Comparing her position with the one of the modern European researcher K. J. Mier, the author analyzes the use of this antithesis in Slavophil anthropology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Siberian Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Siberian Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-3-102-114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-3-102-114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文致力于古典斯拉夫主义哲学,作者认为这是俄罗斯民族认同的第一个概念,达到了哲学层面的概括。一个民族以及个人的自我认同,以理解他们与“他人”之间的关系为前提。斯拉夫主义者视西方为“重要的他者”。对斯拉夫派来说,界定俄罗斯身份边界的最重要标志之一是“内部”和“外部”的对立。作者将她的立场与现代欧洲研究者K. J. Mier的立场相比较,分析了这种对立在斯拉夫人类学中的运用。
Slavophiles on the Relationship between “Internal” and “External” in the Construction of the Boundaries of Russian Identity
The article is devoted to the philosophy of classical Slavophilism, which the author considers as the first conception of Russian national identity, which reached the generalizations of the philosophical level. Self-identification of a people, as well as person, presupposes an understanding of their own characteristics in relation to “others”. The Slavophilеs viewed the West as the “Significant Other”. For the Slavophiles, one of the most important markers allowing to define the boundaries of the Russian identity was the antithesis of “internal” and “external”. Comparing her position with the one of the modern European researcher K. J. Mier, the author analyzes the use of this antithesis in Slavophil anthropology.