欧洲检察官办公室与未参加加强合作的会员国之间的关系

F. Giuffrida
{"title":"欧洲检察官办公室与未参加加强合作的会员国之间的关系","authors":"F. Giuffrida","doi":"10.1177/20322844231157080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first of June 2021 marked the start of the operational activities of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). Established by Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 (‘EPPO Regulation’), the EPPO is the European Union body competent to investigate, prosecute and bring to judgment the perpetrators of criminal offences affecting the Union’s financial interests. The EPPO was established by means of enhanced cooperation. At the time of writing, five Member States do not participate in the EPPO: Denmark, Ireland, Poland, Hungary and Sweden. The effective action against crimes affecting the Union budget requires however smooth cooperation between the EPPO and its counterparts not only in the Member States that participate in the enhanced cooperation, but also in the non-participating Member States. This contribution delves into such cooperation and the several issues it raises, first providing for some introductory remarks on the choice of some Member States not to join the enhanced cooperation on the EPPO. It then analyses the two main provisions of the EPPO Regulation concerning the EPPO’s relations with non-participating Member States, Article 99 and, most importantly, Article 105. Finally, this contribution shortly addresses the relevant role played by Eurojust in this context.","PeriodicalId":448100,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relations between the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the Member States that do not participate in the enhanced cooperation\",\"authors\":\"F. Giuffrida\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20322844231157080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first of June 2021 marked the start of the operational activities of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). Established by Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 (‘EPPO Regulation’), the EPPO is the European Union body competent to investigate, prosecute and bring to judgment the perpetrators of criminal offences affecting the Union’s financial interests. The EPPO was established by means of enhanced cooperation. At the time of writing, five Member States do not participate in the EPPO: Denmark, Ireland, Poland, Hungary and Sweden. The effective action against crimes affecting the Union budget requires however smooth cooperation between the EPPO and its counterparts not only in the Member States that participate in the enhanced cooperation, but also in the non-participating Member States. This contribution delves into such cooperation and the several issues it raises, first providing for some introductory remarks on the choice of some Member States not to join the enhanced cooperation on the EPPO. It then analyses the two main provisions of the EPPO Regulation concerning the EPPO’s relations with non-participating Member States, Article 99 and, most importantly, Article 105. Finally, this contribution shortly addresses the relevant role played by Eurojust in this context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Journal of European Criminal Law\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Journal of European Criminal Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231157080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231157080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年6月1日标志着欧洲检察官办公室(EPPO)业务活动的开始。根据法规(EU) 2017/1939(“EPPO法规”)设立,EPPO是欧盟机构,负责调查、起诉和审判影响欧盟经济利益的刑事犯罪肇事者。植保机制是通过加强合作而建立的。在撰写本文时,有五个会员国未参加EPPO:丹麦、爱尔兰、波兰、匈牙利和瑞典。然而,打击影响联盟预算的犯罪的有效行动需要欧洲刑警组织与其对应机构之间的顺利合作,不仅需要参与加强合作的成员国之间的合作,也需要不参与合作的成员国之间的合作。这篇文章深入探讨了这种合作及其提出的几个问题,首先就一些会员国选择不加入加强后的EPPO合作提出了一些介绍性评论。然后分析了EPPO条例中关于EPPO与非参与成员国关系的两个主要条款,第99条和最重要的第105条。最后,本文简要介绍了欧洲在这方面发挥的相关作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relations between the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the Member States that do not participate in the enhanced cooperation
The first of June 2021 marked the start of the operational activities of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). Established by Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 (‘EPPO Regulation’), the EPPO is the European Union body competent to investigate, prosecute and bring to judgment the perpetrators of criminal offences affecting the Union’s financial interests. The EPPO was established by means of enhanced cooperation. At the time of writing, five Member States do not participate in the EPPO: Denmark, Ireland, Poland, Hungary and Sweden. The effective action against crimes affecting the Union budget requires however smooth cooperation between the EPPO and its counterparts not only in the Member States that participate in the enhanced cooperation, but also in the non-participating Member States. This contribution delves into such cooperation and the several issues it raises, first providing for some introductory remarks on the choice of some Member States not to join the enhanced cooperation on the EPPO. It then analyses the two main provisions of the EPPO Regulation concerning the EPPO’s relations with non-participating Member States, Article 99 and, most importantly, Article 105. Finally, this contribution shortly addresses the relevant role played by Eurojust in this context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulation (EU) 2018/1805: Mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders between efficiency and safeguards. “Proceedings in criminal matters” and non-conviction based confiscation Reforming EU Criminal Law on the Facilitation of Unauthorised Entry: The new Commission proposal in the light of the Kinshasa litigation Independence of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in the context of the appointment procedures The judgment of the CJEU in Inspektor (Purposes of the processing of personal data – criminal investigations) of 8 December 2022 and the concept of further processing under the Law Enforcement Directive Editorial: A trialogue on regulating data-driven criminal procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1