脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术患者静脉注射后叶催产素10 IU稀释10 ml 0.9% Nacl 15秒和60秒对血流动力学的影响

Dion Ricardo, A. Hanafie, Tasrif Hamdi
{"title":"脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术患者静脉注射后叶催产素10 IU稀释10 ml 0.9% Nacl 15秒和60秒对血流动力学的影响","authors":"Dion Ricardo, A. Hanafie, Tasrif Hamdi","doi":"10.47353/jsocmed.v1i3.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Caesarean section (SC) is defined as the birth of a baby through an incision in the abdomen (laparotomy) and uterus (hysterotomy). Spinal anesthesia is the choice for elective SC because it is considered effective and efficient considering its simple technique and ability to provide adequate surgical anesthesia, easy administration, faster onset, and safety. Spinal anesthesia also provides early skin to skin contact which increases maternal satisfaction although the hypotension risk is higher compared to epidural anesthesia which is countered by sympathomimetic vasopressors administration. The aim to research was to compare the administration of 10 IU oxytocin diluted in 10 cc of 0.9% NaCl for 15 seconds with 60 seconds on hemodynamics in sectio caesarean patients under spinal anesthesia.\nMethod: This study used an RCT (Randomized Clinical Trial) design with double blind, meaning that neither the research subjects nor the observers were aware of the treatment or intervention given. The study sample was patients who underwent Sectio Caesaria at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan, and the Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital which fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria.\nResults: It was found that there was not a significant difference in MAP values between the 15-second and 60-second bolus groups with p-values for the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes respectively 0.804, 0.692, 0.568 , 0.216, 0.754, and 0.390. In addition, it is known that there was a significant difference in pulse values between the 15-second and 60-second bolus groups at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 minutes, with the results of the p-value before, 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes are 0.509, 0.464, 0.805, 0.055, 0.475 and 0.857 respectively. In this study, no side effects were found in either group between 15 second and 60 second boluses.\nConclusion: There were no significant hemodynamic changes in both test groups (15 second and 60 second boluses), at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 minutes.","PeriodicalId":370087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Society Medicine","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Oxytocin 10 IU Intravena Dilution of 10 ml Nacl 0.9% Bolus for 15 Seconds and 60 Seconds to Hemodynamics in Sectio Caesaria Patients with Spinal Anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Dion Ricardo, A. Hanafie, Tasrif Hamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.47353/jsocmed.v1i3.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Caesarean section (SC) is defined as the birth of a baby through an incision in the abdomen (laparotomy) and uterus (hysterotomy). Spinal anesthesia is the choice for elective SC because it is considered effective and efficient considering its simple technique and ability to provide adequate surgical anesthesia, easy administration, faster onset, and safety. Spinal anesthesia also provides early skin to skin contact which increases maternal satisfaction although the hypotension risk is higher compared to epidural anesthesia which is countered by sympathomimetic vasopressors administration. The aim to research was to compare the administration of 10 IU oxytocin diluted in 10 cc of 0.9% NaCl for 15 seconds with 60 seconds on hemodynamics in sectio caesarean patients under spinal anesthesia.\\nMethod: This study used an RCT (Randomized Clinical Trial) design with double blind, meaning that neither the research subjects nor the observers were aware of the treatment or intervention given. The study sample was patients who underwent Sectio Caesaria at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan, and the Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital which fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria.\\nResults: It was found that there was not a significant difference in MAP values between the 15-second and 60-second bolus groups with p-values for the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes respectively 0.804, 0.692, 0.568 , 0.216, 0.754, and 0.390. In addition, it is known that there was a significant difference in pulse values between the 15-second and 60-second bolus groups at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 minutes, with the results of the p-value before, 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes are 0.509, 0.464, 0.805, 0.055, 0.475 and 0.857 respectively. In this study, no side effects were found in either group between 15 second and 60 second boluses.\\nConclusion: There were no significant hemodynamic changes in both test groups (15 second and 60 second boluses), at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 minutes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Society Medicine\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Society Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47353/jsocmed.v1i3.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Society Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47353/jsocmed.v1i3.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

剖宫产术(SC)的定义是通过腹部切口(剖腹)和子宫(子宫切开术)分娩婴儿。脊髓麻醉是选择性SC的选择,因为它被认为是有效和高效的,因为它技术简单,能够提供足够的手术麻醉,给药容易,起效快,安全。脊髓麻醉还提供早期皮肤与皮肤的接触,这增加了产妇的满意度,尽管与硬膜外麻醉相比,低血压的风险更高,这是由拟交感神经加压药物治疗的结果。研究的目的是比较脊髓麻醉下剖宫产患者使用10 IU后叶催产素稀释10 cc 0.9% NaCl 15秒和60秒对血液动力学的影响。方法:本研究采用双盲RCT(随机临床试验)设计,即研究对象和观察者都不知道所给予的治疗或干预。研究样本为棉兰哈吉·亚当·马利克综合医院和苏门答腊Utara大学医院接受剖腹产手术的患者,符合纳入和排除标准。结果:15秒注射组与60秒注射组的MAP值无显著性差异,第1、3、5、10分钟的p值分别为0.804、0.692、0.568、0.216、0.754、0.390。此外,已知15秒和60秒注射组在1、3、5、10和15分钟的脉冲值有显著性差异,1、3、5、10和15分钟前的p值分别为0.509、0.464、0.805、0.055、0.475和0.857。在这项研究中,在15秒到60秒的时间里,两组都没有发现副作用。结论:在1、3、5、10、15分钟时,两组患者(15秒和60秒)的血流动力学均无明显变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Oxytocin 10 IU Intravena Dilution of 10 ml Nacl 0.9% Bolus for 15 Seconds and 60 Seconds to Hemodynamics in Sectio Caesaria Patients with Spinal Anesthesia
Introduction: Caesarean section (SC) is defined as the birth of a baby through an incision in the abdomen (laparotomy) and uterus (hysterotomy). Spinal anesthesia is the choice for elective SC because it is considered effective and efficient considering its simple technique and ability to provide adequate surgical anesthesia, easy administration, faster onset, and safety. Spinal anesthesia also provides early skin to skin contact which increases maternal satisfaction although the hypotension risk is higher compared to epidural anesthesia which is countered by sympathomimetic vasopressors administration. The aim to research was to compare the administration of 10 IU oxytocin diluted in 10 cc of 0.9% NaCl for 15 seconds with 60 seconds on hemodynamics in sectio caesarean patients under spinal anesthesia. Method: This study used an RCT (Randomized Clinical Trial) design with double blind, meaning that neither the research subjects nor the observers were aware of the treatment or intervention given. The study sample was patients who underwent Sectio Caesaria at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan, and the Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital which fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: It was found that there was not a significant difference in MAP values between the 15-second and 60-second bolus groups with p-values for the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes respectively 0.804, 0.692, 0.568 , 0.216, 0.754, and 0.390. In addition, it is known that there was a significant difference in pulse values between the 15-second and 60-second bolus groups at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 minutes, with the results of the p-value before, 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes are 0.509, 0.464, 0.805, 0.055, 0.475 and 0.857 respectively. In this study, no side effects were found in either group between 15 second and 60 second boluses. Conclusion: There were no significant hemodynamic changes in both test groups (15 second and 60 second boluses), at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 minutes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between Coagulation Profile and Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio with Karnofsky Performance Status Scale In Brain Tumor Patients Correlation Between Depression Level and Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Patients Undergoing Regular Hemodialysis at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan Prognostic Value of Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE), Right Ventricular Fractional Area Changes (RV FAC) and Pulses Tissue Doppler S' Wave (PTD S') at 30 Days after Care of Acute Miocardial Infarction Patients in Haji Adam Malik Hospital Correlation of Fatty Liver Imaging on Abdominal CT-Scan with Dyslipidemia in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital in 2020 The Relationship Between Serum Apolipoprotein B Levels and Severity of Coronary Lesions Using The Syntax Score in Non-St Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1