{"title":"传统科学?","authors":"L. Poggiali","doi":"10.4081/INCONTRI.2019.469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific Conventionalism claims that conventional traits stands in theories in many forms and for many reasons. Relevant arguments about conventionalities in science will briefly be discussed, pointing out a Linguistic Conventionalism and a Methodological Conventionalism. We will show the common ground between the two and how they interact. Eventually we will highlight how conventionality of theoretical framework implies conventionality of the mathematics and the ontology adopted.","PeriodicalId":119535,"journal":{"name":"Istituto Lombardo - Accademia di Scienze e Lettere - Incontri di Studio","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SCIENZA PER CONVENZIONE?\",\"authors\":\"L. Poggiali\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/INCONTRI.2019.469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific Conventionalism claims that conventional traits stands in theories in many forms and for many reasons. Relevant arguments about conventionalities in science will briefly be discussed, pointing out a Linguistic Conventionalism and a Methodological Conventionalism. We will show the common ground between the two and how they interact. Eventually we will highlight how conventionality of theoretical framework implies conventionality of the mathematics and the ontology adopted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Istituto Lombardo - Accademia di Scienze e Lettere - Incontri di Studio\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Istituto Lombardo - Accademia di Scienze e Lettere - Incontri di Studio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/INCONTRI.2019.469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istituto Lombardo - Accademia di Scienze e Lettere - Incontri di Studio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/INCONTRI.2019.469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学约定俗成主义声称,约定俗成的特征以多种形式存在于理论中,原因也多种多样。本文将简要讨论科学中关于约定俗成的相关争论,指出语言约定俗成和方法论约定俗成。我们将展示两者之间的共同点以及它们如何相互作用。最后,我们将强调理论框架的约定俗成意味着所采用的数学和本体论的约定俗成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SCIENZA PER CONVENZIONE?
Scientific Conventionalism claims that conventional traits stands in theories in many forms and for many reasons. Relevant arguments about conventionalities in science will briefly be discussed, pointing out a Linguistic Conventionalism and a Methodological Conventionalism. We will show the common ground between the two and how they interact. Eventually we will highlight how conventionality of theoretical framework implies conventionality of the mathematics and the ontology adopted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GLI OBIETTIVI DI SVILUPPO SOSTENIBILE DELLE NAZIONI UNITE 2015-2030 SVILUPPO SOSTENIBILE: GLI OBIETTIVI DELLE NAZIONI UNITE 2015-2030 GLI OBIETTIVI DI SVILUPPO SOSTENIBILE AI TEMPI DELLA PANDEMIA OBIETTIVO 10a. RIDURRE LE DISUGUAGLIANZE ALL’INTERNO E FRA LE NAZIONI GREEN ECONOMY: LA MIGLIORE RISPOSTA ALLA CRISI, UNA SFIDA PER IL FUTURO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1