权责发生制复式记账法——城市地方机构财务管理的改革

Vinod G, B. T.
{"title":"权责发生制复式记账法——城市地方机构财务管理的改革","authors":"Vinod G, B. T.","doi":"10.59640/cbr.v14i2.26-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Cash Based Single Entry System of Accounting (CBSESA) was usedby Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), since their inception for the purpose of financial recording and reporting. Because of the system’s inherent limitations, ULBs have failed to fulfil financial responsibility, transparency requirements, tapping new avenues of finance and efficient financial administration. The 11th National Finance Commission has made its apprehension on the accounting system followed in Local Self Governments (LSGs) and strongly recommended for a change in the accounting system as a good governance initiative. Time has proven that accrual-based double entry system of accounting is the most scientific method for financial recording and reporting, and the same has been in practice in commercial entities since 15th century. Unfortunately, the socalled scientific system could not be brought about in Government accounting or LSG accounting till the end of 20th century. As the first leap the Government of India suggested to adopt Accrual Based Double Entry System of Accounting (ABDESA) in ULBs in 2004. The state of Kerala adopted Municipal Accounts Manual and ABDESA in selected ULBs from 1st April 2007 (G.O.MS/8/2007/LSGD). Since, accounting information is largely used by stake holders for different purposes including financial administration and decisions, quality of such decisions (based on the published financial statements) rests largely on the shoulder of quality of information. The present paper is a detailed analysis of the quality of financial statements generated under ABDESA by the ULBs of Kerala, based on the primary data collected from five Municipal Corporations and 40 Municipalities.","PeriodicalId":426677,"journal":{"name":"Commerce & Business Researcher","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accrual Based Double Entry Accounting - A Revamp in the Financial Administration of Urban Local Bodies\",\"authors\":\"Vinod G, B. T.\",\"doi\":\"10.59640/cbr.v14i2.26-33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Cash Based Single Entry System of Accounting (CBSESA) was usedby Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), since their inception for the purpose of financial recording and reporting. Because of the system’s inherent limitations, ULBs have failed to fulfil financial responsibility, transparency requirements, tapping new avenues of finance and efficient financial administration. The 11th National Finance Commission has made its apprehension on the accounting system followed in Local Self Governments (LSGs) and strongly recommended for a change in the accounting system as a good governance initiative. Time has proven that accrual-based double entry system of accounting is the most scientific method for financial recording and reporting, and the same has been in practice in commercial entities since 15th century. Unfortunately, the socalled scientific system could not be brought about in Government accounting or LSG accounting till the end of 20th century. As the first leap the Government of India suggested to adopt Accrual Based Double Entry System of Accounting (ABDESA) in ULBs in 2004. The state of Kerala adopted Municipal Accounts Manual and ABDESA in selected ULBs from 1st April 2007 (G.O.MS/8/2007/LSGD). Since, accounting information is largely used by stake holders for different purposes including financial administration and decisions, quality of such decisions (based on the published financial statements) rests largely on the shoulder of quality of information. The present paper is a detailed analysis of the quality of financial statements generated under ABDESA by the ULBs of Kerala, based on the primary data collected from five Municipal Corporations and 40 Municipalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Commerce & Business Researcher\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Commerce & Business Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59640/cbr.v14i2.26-33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commerce & Business Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59640/cbr.v14i2.26-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以现金为基础的单一记帐系统(CBSESA)自成立以来一直被城市地方机构(ulb)用于财务记录和报告。由于该制度固有的局限性,联合银行未能履行财务责任、透明度要求、开拓新的融资渠道和有效的财务管理。第11届国家财政委员会对地方自治团体(lggs)的会计制度表示担忧,并作为“善治计划”强烈建议改变会计制度。时间已经证明,以权责发生制为基础的复式记帐制度是最科学的财务记录和报告方法,自15世纪以来一直在商业实体中实践。遗憾的是,直到20世纪末,政府会计或LSG会计才形成了所谓的科学体系。作为第一次飞跃,印度政府于2004年建议在ULBs中采用权责发生制复式记账制(ABDESA)。自2007年4月1日起,喀拉拉邦在选定的ulb中采用了市政账户手册和ABDESA (G.O.MS/8/2007/LSGD)。由于会计信息主要由利益相关者用于不同的目的,包括财务管理和决策,这些决策的质量(基于公布的财务报表)在很大程度上取决于信息质量。本文基于从五个市政公司和40个城市收集的主要数据,详细分析了喀拉拉邦ulb在ABDESA下产生的财务报表的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accrual Based Double Entry Accounting - A Revamp in the Financial Administration of Urban Local Bodies
The Cash Based Single Entry System of Accounting (CBSESA) was usedby Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), since their inception for the purpose of financial recording and reporting. Because of the system’s inherent limitations, ULBs have failed to fulfil financial responsibility, transparency requirements, tapping new avenues of finance and efficient financial administration. The 11th National Finance Commission has made its apprehension on the accounting system followed in Local Self Governments (LSGs) and strongly recommended for a change in the accounting system as a good governance initiative. Time has proven that accrual-based double entry system of accounting is the most scientific method for financial recording and reporting, and the same has been in practice in commercial entities since 15th century. Unfortunately, the socalled scientific system could not be brought about in Government accounting or LSG accounting till the end of 20th century. As the first leap the Government of India suggested to adopt Accrual Based Double Entry System of Accounting (ABDESA) in ULBs in 2004. The state of Kerala adopted Municipal Accounts Manual and ABDESA in selected ULBs from 1st April 2007 (G.O.MS/8/2007/LSGD). Since, accounting information is largely used by stake holders for different purposes including financial administration and decisions, quality of such decisions (based on the published financial statements) rests largely on the shoulder of quality of information. The present paper is a detailed analysis of the quality of financial statements generated under ABDESA by the ULBs of Kerala, based on the primary data collected from five Municipal Corporations and 40 Municipalities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Regulation of False and Misleading Advertisements with Special Reference to Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Online Food Delivery- A Solution for Upsurging Restaurant Business Household Access to Credit in Times of A Natural Disaster – The Case of Kerala Floods Atal Pension Yojana: Effect of Inflation And Time Value of Money Influence of Stock Brokers on the Investment Decision of Individual Stock Investors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1