神经科学中的因果关系和逻辑

G. Buzsáki
{"title":"神经科学中的因果关系和逻辑","authors":"G. Buzsáki","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190905385.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Causality is the most critical pillar of scientific inference in the Western world. Revealing a cause amounts to an explanation. However, other cultures that do not rely on cause-and-effect arguments can also arrive at valid scientific conclusions. The concept of causation is especially problematic in self-organized systems with amplifying-damping feedback loops, such as the brain. Causes in such systems are often circular or multidirectional; events are not caused but emerge. Correlation is symmetric, in the mathematical sense. However, in searching for the cause of the assumed interactions, we designate one set of variables as independent and the other as dependent, interpreting the relationship as asymmetric. Precaution should be taken not to conflate the “thing-to-be-explained” with “things that explain.”","PeriodicalId":270832,"journal":{"name":"The Brain from Inside Out","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causation and Logic in Neuroscience\",\"authors\":\"G. Buzsáki\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780190905385.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Causality is the most critical pillar of scientific inference in the Western world. Revealing a cause amounts to an explanation. However, other cultures that do not rely on cause-and-effect arguments can also arrive at valid scientific conclusions. The concept of causation is especially problematic in self-organized systems with amplifying-damping feedback loops, such as the brain. Causes in such systems are often circular or multidirectional; events are not caused but emerge. Correlation is symmetric, in the mathematical sense. However, in searching for the cause of the assumed interactions, we designate one set of variables as independent and the other as dependent, interpreting the relationship as asymmetric. Precaution should be taken not to conflate the “thing-to-be-explained” with “things that explain.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":270832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Brain from Inside Out\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Brain from Inside Out\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190905385.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Brain from Inside Out","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190905385.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在西方世界,因果关系是科学推论最重要的支柱。揭示原因就等于解释。然而,其他不依赖因果论证的文化也可以得出有效的科学结论。因果关系的概念在具有放大-阻尼反馈回路的自组织系统(如大脑)中尤其有问题。这种系统中的原因往往是循环的或多向的;事件不是起因而是自然发生的。在数学意义上,相关性是对称的。然而,在寻找假定相互作用的原因时,我们指定一组变量为独立变量,另一组变量为依赖变量,将这种关系解释为不对称关系。应该采取预防措施,不要将“有待解释的事情”与“可以解释的事情”混为一谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causation and Logic in Neuroscience
Causality is the most critical pillar of scientific inference in the Western world. Revealing a cause amounts to an explanation. However, other cultures that do not rely on cause-and-effect arguments can also arrive at valid scientific conclusions. The concept of causation is especially problematic in self-organized systems with amplifying-damping feedback loops, such as the brain. Causes in such systems are often circular or multidirectional; events are not caused but emerge. Correlation is symmetric, in the mathematical sense. However, in searching for the cause of the assumed interactions, we designate one set of variables as independent and the other as dependent, interpreting the relationship as asymmetric. Precaution should be taken not to conflate the “thing-to-be-explained” with “things that explain.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Problem Internalization of Experience Enhancing Brain Performance by Externalizing Thought Perception from Action Gain and Abstraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1