{"title":"日惹市伊斯兰初中八年级试题试题分析","authors":"N. Aisyah","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200130.096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is a survey intended to determine the level of difficulty and power of discrimination of a final test 2018/2019 academic year with the use of multiple choice applied in the subject of Aqidah-Akhlak for the Islamic Junior High School’s Eighth Grade in Yogyakarta. Method of data collection use documentation review by analyzed 40 items of the multiple-choice questions provided by Ministry of Religion in Yogyakarta, which sample is MTs X by purpose sampling technique. This research was held by analyzing different levels of difficulty and power of discrimination of any item what used AnBuso versi 8.0 further interpreted into established criteria. The main source was the document of that multiple-choice instrument. The results showed that the level of difficulty was considered no proportional with 50% medium, 30% easy and 20% hard. Meanwhile, the power of discrimination was poor 24 items, fair 7 items, good with 6 items and 4 items satisfied. Therefore, it is not good assessment instrument to measure different capability of students.","PeriodicalId":269449,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Psychology and Pedagogy - \"Diversity in Education\" (ICEPP 2019)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of the Eight-Grade Test’s Items of the Islamic Junior High School in Yogyakarta\",\"authors\":\"N. Aisyah\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.200130.096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is a survey intended to determine the level of difficulty and power of discrimination of a final test 2018/2019 academic year with the use of multiple choice applied in the subject of Aqidah-Akhlak for the Islamic Junior High School’s Eighth Grade in Yogyakarta. Method of data collection use documentation review by analyzed 40 items of the multiple-choice questions provided by Ministry of Religion in Yogyakarta, which sample is MTs X by purpose sampling technique. This research was held by analyzing different levels of difficulty and power of discrimination of any item what used AnBuso versi 8.0 further interpreted into established criteria. The main source was the document of that multiple-choice instrument. The results showed that the level of difficulty was considered no proportional with 50% medium, 30% easy and 20% hard. Meanwhile, the power of discrimination was poor 24 items, fair 7 items, good with 6 items and 4 items satisfied. Therefore, it is not good assessment instrument to measure different capability of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Psychology and Pedagogy - \\\"Diversity in Education\\\" (ICEPP 2019)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Psychology and Pedagogy - \\\"Diversity in Education\\\" (ICEPP 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Psychology and Pedagogy - \"Diversity in Education\" (ICEPP 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究是一项调查,旨在确定2018/2019学年期末考试的难度和歧视程度,并在日惹伊斯兰初中八年级的Aqidah-Akhlak科目中使用选择题。数据收集方法采用文献回顾法,对日惹宗教部提供的40项选择题进行分析,采用目的抽样技术,样本为MTs X。本研究通过分析AnBuso version 8.0中任意条目的不同难度和辨别能力,将其进一步解释为既定标准。主要来源是该多项选择题的文件。结果表明,50%中、30%易、20%难的难度水平被认为是不成比例的。辨别能力差的有24项,一般的有7项,好的有6项,满意的有4项。因此,它并不是一个很好的衡量学生不同能力的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of the Eight-Grade Test’s Items of the Islamic Junior High School in Yogyakarta
This study is a survey intended to determine the level of difficulty and power of discrimination of a final test 2018/2019 academic year with the use of multiple choice applied in the subject of Aqidah-Akhlak for the Islamic Junior High School’s Eighth Grade in Yogyakarta. Method of data collection use documentation review by analyzed 40 items of the multiple-choice questions provided by Ministry of Religion in Yogyakarta, which sample is MTs X by purpose sampling technique. This research was held by analyzing different levels of difficulty and power of discrimination of any item what used AnBuso versi 8.0 further interpreted into established criteria. The main source was the document of that multiple-choice instrument. The results showed that the level of difficulty was considered no proportional with 50% medium, 30% easy and 20% hard. Meanwhile, the power of discrimination was poor 24 items, fair 7 items, good with 6 items and 4 items satisfied. Therefore, it is not good assessment instrument to measure different capability of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiential-Based Counseling: to Improve Adversity Intelligence Adolescent The Effect of Information Technology on the Quality of Teaching Learning Process in Junior High School in Bandung Analysis of Pedagogic Competence of Elementary School Teachers Based on Regional Characteristics Is There Peace in My Classroom? A Student’s Perspective of Peace with Narrative Research in Senior High Schools in Yogyakarta Evaluation of Education and Training Programs for Naval Officers Personnel Specialization in Kodiklatal (Naval School)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1