老年患者胸腔积液的超声诊断

Mauro Cerquitella, P. Saccomandi, E. Schena, S. Silvestri, S. Scarlata, R. Giua
{"title":"老年患者胸腔积液的超声诊断","authors":"Mauro Cerquitella, P. Saccomandi, E. Schena, S. Silvestri, S. Scarlata, R. Giua","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pleural fluid is a viscous substance between the two pleural layers of the lungs, important in the respiratory mechanics. A pleural effusion (PE) is an excess of pleural fluid in the pleural cavity, caused by several pathologies (e.g., pulmonary embolism, cancer, and infections). Because of its incidence, PE identification and quantification are important to lead the clinician in the selection of the optimal therapeutic strategy. PE volume can be estimated by invasive (quantitative) and non-invasive (qualitative) approaches. Invasive methods provide accurate measurement of PE volume and utilize Computed Tomography (CT) imaging and thoracentesis. Non-invasive methods are based on Ultrasound (US) imaging and are able to identify the PE, but do not quantify its volume. Aiming to spare the patients from risks due to X-ray exposure and invasiveness of thoracentesis, a non-invasive approach for the estimation of PE is coveted. The aim of this study is the feasibility assessment of a simple and affordable model for the quantification of PE through US images. Two US scans are performed to measure: the height of PE column (hPEUS) and the area of the effusion (aPEUS) in correspondence of half hPEUS. The proposed model estimates the PE volume (PEVUS) by multiplying hPEUS and aPEUS, based on cylindrical approximation. PEVUS are compared with PE volumes estimated by CT scans (PEVct), achieved within 24 h from the US exam. The model was successfully tested on 7 patients for PE volumes ranging from 70 mL to 550 mL. The good agreement between PEVus and PEVct volumes is witnessed by the slope of the best fitting line (0.988) and the high correlation coefficient (R=0.99). The two measurements are also compared by Bland-Altman plot, which provides a mean of difference of 1.7 mL and limits of agreement of -32.5 mL and +36.0 mL. The findings of this work show that the proposed model can be a valid tool for the estimation of PE volume by means of US exam. An important advantage of this model is the possibility to quantify PE by the measurements of only two parameters. This approach is not time consuming, hence it can be easily implemented in clinical routine.","PeriodicalId":221120,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"3019 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound estimation of pleural effusion in geriatric patients\",\"authors\":\"Mauro Cerquitella, P. Saccomandi, E. Schena, S. Silvestri, S. Scarlata, R. Giua\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pleural fluid is a viscous substance between the two pleural layers of the lungs, important in the respiratory mechanics. A pleural effusion (PE) is an excess of pleural fluid in the pleural cavity, caused by several pathologies (e.g., pulmonary embolism, cancer, and infections). Because of its incidence, PE identification and quantification are important to lead the clinician in the selection of the optimal therapeutic strategy. PE volume can be estimated by invasive (quantitative) and non-invasive (qualitative) approaches. Invasive methods provide accurate measurement of PE volume and utilize Computed Tomography (CT) imaging and thoracentesis. Non-invasive methods are based on Ultrasound (US) imaging and are able to identify the PE, but do not quantify its volume. Aiming to spare the patients from risks due to X-ray exposure and invasiveness of thoracentesis, a non-invasive approach for the estimation of PE is coveted. The aim of this study is the feasibility assessment of a simple and affordable model for the quantification of PE through US images. Two US scans are performed to measure: the height of PE column (hPEUS) and the area of the effusion (aPEUS) in correspondence of half hPEUS. The proposed model estimates the PE volume (PEVUS) by multiplying hPEUS and aPEUS, based on cylindrical approximation. PEVUS are compared with PE volumes estimated by CT scans (PEVct), achieved within 24 h from the US exam. The model was successfully tested on 7 patients for PE volumes ranging from 70 mL to 550 mL. The good agreement between PEVus and PEVct volumes is witnessed by the slope of the best fitting line (0.988) and the high correlation coefficient (R=0.99). The two measurements are also compared by Bland-Altman plot, which provides a mean of difference of 1.7 mL and limits of agreement of -32.5 mL and +36.0 mL. The findings of this work show that the proposed model can be a valid tool for the estimation of PE volume by means of US exam. An important advantage of this model is the possibility to quantify PE by the measurements of only two parameters. This approach is not time consuming, hence it can be easily implemented in clinical routine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"volume\":\"3019 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

胸膜液是介于肺两层胸膜之间的一种粘性物质,在呼吸力学中很重要。胸腔积液(PE)是由多种病理(如肺栓塞、癌症和感染)引起的胸腔积液过多。由于其发病率高,PE的鉴定和量化对于指导临床医生选择最佳治疗策略非常重要。PE体积可以通过侵入性(定量)和非侵入性(定性)方法来估计。侵入性方法提供准确的PE体积测量,并利用计算机断层扫描(CT)成像和胸腔穿刺。非侵入性方法基于超声(US)成像,能够识别PE,但不能量化其体积。为了避免患者因x线暴露和胸穿刺的侵入性所带来的风险,一种无创的PE评估方法是人们所渴望的。本研究的目的是可行性评估一个简单的和负担得起的模型,量化PE通过美国图像。进行两次超声扫描来测量:PE柱的高度(hPEUS)和积液的面积(aPEUS)对应于半hPEUS。该模型基于圆柱形近似,通过hPEUS和aPEUS相乘来估计PE体积(PEVUS)。将PEVUS与CT扫描(PEVct)估计的PE体积进行比较,PEVct是在超声检查后24小时内获得的。该模型成功地对7例患者的PE体积进行了测试,范围从70 mL到550 mL。最佳拟合线斜率为0.988,相关系数高(R=0.99), PEVus与PEVct体积吻合良好。这两个测量结果也通过Bland-Altman图进行了比较,其提供了1.7 mL的平均差异和-32.5 mL和+36.0 mL的一致限。这项工作的发现表明,所提出的模型可以是通过US检查估计PE体积的有效工具。该模型的一个重要优点是可以通过仅测量两个参数来量化PE。该方法耗时短,易于在临床常规中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasound estimation of pleural effusion in geriatric patients
The pleural fluid is a viscous substance between the two pleural layers of the lungs, important in the respiratory mechanics. A pleural effusion (PE) is an excess of pleural fluid in the pleural cavity, caused by several pathologies (e.g., pulmonary embolism, cancer, and infections). Because of its incidence, PE identification and quantification are important to lead the clinician in the selection of the optimal therapeutic strategy. PE volume can be estimated by invasive (quantitative) and non-invasive (qualitative) approaches. Invasive methods provide accurate measurement of PE volume and utilize Computed Tomography (CT) imaging and thoracentesis. Non-invasive methods are based on Ultrasound (US) imaging and are able to identify the PE, but do not quantify its volume. Aiming to spare the patients from risks due to X-ray exposure and invasiveness of thoracentesis, a non-invasive approach for the estimation of PE is coveted. The aim of this study is the feasibility assessment of a simple and affordable model for the quantification of PE through US images. Two US scans are performed to measure: the height of PE column (hPEUS) and the area of the effusion (aPEUS) in correspondence of half hPEUS. The proposed model estimates the PE volume (PEVUS) by multiplying hPEUS and aPEUS, based on cylindrical approximation. PEVUS are compared with PE volumes estimated by CT scans (PEVct), achieved within 24 h from the US exam. The model was successfully tested on 7 patients for PE volumes ranging from 70 mL to 550 mL. The good agreement between PEVus and PEVct volumes is witnessed by the slope of the best fitting line (0.988) and the high correlation coefficient (R=0.99). The two measurements are also compared by Bland-Altman plot, which provides a mean of difference of 1.7 mL and limits of agreement of -32.5 mL and +36.0 mL. The findings of this work show that the proposed model can be a valid tool for the estimation of PE volume by means of US exam. An important advantage of this model is the possibility to quantify PE by the measurements of only two parameters. This approach is not time consuming, hence it can be easily implemented in clinical routine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of temperature rise in tissue — Mimicking material induced by a HIFU transducer Influence of fiber Bragg grating length on temperature measurements in laser-irradiated organs Optimal peripheral measurement point for the assessment of preterm patients in intensive care units Classification of cognitive and resting states of the brain using EEG features Scoring systems in dermatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1