地方背景,全球基准:以联合国电子政务发展指数为例,提出调整方法的建议

M. M. Nielsen, J. Millard
{"title":"地方背景,全球基准:以联合国电子政务发展指数为例,提出调整方法的建议","authors":"M. M. Nielsen, J. Millard","doi":"10.1145/3396956.3396969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a brief overview of how e-government benchmarks have evolved over time, why this has happened and what the consequences have been, with a particular focus on UNDESA's biennial e-government surveys. Such change is inevitable and indeed necessary as both technology and government change and the societal challenges they are applied to are in constant flux. Three sets of recommendations are made concerning next steps. First, it is recommended to significantly extend the focus of UNDESA to sub-national level and particularly to cities, including borrowing some concepts and approaches from smart city benchmarking, given that it is here that most (e)government services are both delivered and consumed. Second, there is a need to increase the focus of e-government benchmarking on the SDGs as a global set of policy goals and targets that are both universally standardized as well as being locally adaptable. Third, a number of recommendations are given concerning measurement issues that attempt to make it possible to address the first two recommendations, whilst still recognizing that there will always remain unresolved dilemmas and challenges, so it is not possible to completely future-prof, address all possible contextual variations nor all potential assessment aims.","PeriodicalId":118651,"journal":{"name":"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local context, global benchmarks:: Recommendations for an adapted approach using the UN E-Government Development Index as an example\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Nielsen, J. Millard\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3396956.3396969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a brief overview of how e-government benchmarks have evolved over time, why this has happened and what the consequences have been, with a particular focus on UNDESA's biennial e-government surveys. Such change is inevitable and indeed necessary as both technology and government change and the societal challenges they are applied to are in constant flux. Three sets of recommendations are made concerning next steps. First, it is recommended to significantly extend the focus of UNDESA to sub-national level and particularly to cities, including borrowing some concepts and approaches from smart city benchmarking, given that it is here that most (e)government services are both delivered and consumed. Second, there is a need to increase the focus of e-government benchmarking on the SDGs as a global set of policy goals and targets that are both universally standardized as well as being locally adaptable. Third, a number of recommendations are given concerning measurement issues that attempt to make it possible to address the first two recommendations, whilst still recognizing that there will always remain unresolved dilemmas and challenges, so it is not possible to completely future-prof, address all possible contextual variations nor all potential assessment aims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文简要概述了电子政务基准是如何随着时间的推移而演变的,为什么会发生这种情况以及后果是什么,并特别关注了联合国经社部两年一次的电子政务调查。这种变化是不可避免的,而且确实是必要的,因为技术和政府的变化以及它们所适用的社会挑战都在不断变化。就今后的步骤提出了三套建议。首先,鉴于大多数(e)政府服务都是在城市提供和消费的,建议将联合国经社部的重点大大扩展到次国家一级,特别是城市,包括借鉴智慧城市基准的一些概念和方法。第二,有必要加强对可持续发展目标的电子政务基准的关注,作为一套全球政策目标和指标,既要普遍标准化,又要适应地方。第三,给出了一些关于度量问题的建议,这些建议试图使解决前两个建议成为可能,同时仍然认识到始终存在未解决的困境和挑战,因此不可能完全面向未来,解决所有可能的上下文变化,也不可能解决所有潜在的评估目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Local context, global benchmarks:: Recommendations for an adapted approach using the UN E-Government Development Index as an example
This paper provides a brief overview of how e-government benchmarks have evolved over time, why this has happened and what the consequences have been, with a particular focus on UNDESA's biennial e-government surveys. Such change is inevitable and indeed necessary as both technology and government change and the societal challenges they are applied to are in constant flux. Three sets of recommendations are made concerning next steps. First, it is recommended to significantly extend the focus of UNDESA to sub-national level and particularly to cities, including borrowing some concepts and approaches from smart city benchmarking, given that it is here that most (e)government services are both delivered and consumed. Second, there is a need to increase the focus of e-government benchmarking on the SDGs as a global set of policy goals and targets that are both universally standardized as well as being locally adaptable. Third, a number of recommendations are given concerning measurement issues that attempt to make it possible to address the first two recommendations, whilst still recognizing that there will always remain unresolved dilemmas and challenges, so it is not possible to completely future-prof, address all possible contextual variations nor all potential assessment aims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing social media institutionalization in public administration. The role of inhibitors in local governments Keynote: Using Blockchain to Empower Digital Government An Overview of Ten Years of Liquid Democracy Research Session details: Artificial Intelligence Challenges and Implications for Public Management and Policy Smart City, Net Neutrality, and Antitrust: findings from Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1