教育专业知识:对基本概念的理论分析

I. Tryhub
{"title":"教育专业知识:对基本概念的理论分析","authors":"I. Tryhub","doi":"10.28925/2518-7635.2019.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to theoretical analysis of basic concepts of the problem of expertise in the field of education. It is revealed that ambiguity in the definition of expertise is traced in the scientific literature, as well as the substitution of this concept by similar ones, such as monitoring, diagnostics, inspection, evaluation, audit, control, consulting, etc. It is noted that the above concepts differ in their essence, purpose, tasks, functions, purpose, objects, content, participants, application, technologies, methods, tools and output. The author specifies the essence of theoretical concepts of «expert activity in education» and «expert in the field of education».","PeriodicalId":103993,"journal":{"name":"The Modern Higher Education Review","volume":"3096 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPERTISE IN EDUCATION: THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIC CONCEPTS\",\"authors\":\"I. Tryhub\",\"doi\":\"10.28925/2518-7635.2019.4.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to theoretical analysis of basic concepts of the problem of expertise in the field of education. It is revealed that ambiguity in the definition of expertise is traced in the scientific literature, as well as the substitution of this concept by similar ones, such as monitoring, diagnostics, inspection, evaluation, audit, control, consulting, etc. It is noted that the above concepts differ in their essence, purpose, tasks, functions, purpose, objects, content, participants, application, technologies, methods, tools and output. The author specifies the essence of theoretical concepts of «expert activity in education» and «expert in the field of education».\",\"PeriodicalId\":103993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Modern Higher Education Review\",\"volume\":\"3096 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Modern Higher Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-7635.2019.4.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Modern Higher Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-7635.2019.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对教育领域专业知识问题的基本概念进行了理论分析。研究发现,在科学文献中,专业知识的定义存在歧义,这一概念被类似的概念所取代,如监测、诊断、检查、评估、审计、控制、咨询等。需要注意的是,上述概念在本质、目的、任务、功能、目的、对象、内容、参与者、应用、技术、方法、工具和输出等方面有所不同。作者明确了“教育专家活动”和“教育领域专家”这两个理论概念的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPERTISE IN EDUCATION: THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIC CONCEPTS
The article is devoted to theoretical analysis of basic concepts of the problem of expertise in the field of education. It is revealed that ambiguity in the definition of expertise is traced in the scientific literature, as well as the substitution of this concept by similar ones, such as monitoring, diagnostics, inspection, evaluation, audit, control, consulting, etc. It is noted that the above concepts differ in their essence, purpose, tasks, functions, purpose, objects, content, participants, application, technologies, methods, tools and output. The author specifies the essence of theoretical concepts of «expert activity in education» and «expert in the field of education».
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOCIAL AND PEDAGOGICAL SUPPORT OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS COMPUTER-BASED TESTING: A NECESSARY EVIL OR A SENSIBLE CHOICE? CASE STUDY: THE DIDACTIC MODEL OF SOCIO-COGNITIVE THEORY OF LEARNING IN THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE. TEACHING STATE AND ACTIVITY VERBS SYNERGETIC PRINCIPLES OF MODERNIZATION OF TEACHING NATURAL DISCIPLINES FORMS IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION LOGICAL AND RATIONAL COMPONENT OF MODERN EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1