新型杀虫剂对芥菜蚜的防治效果研究

Nand Kishor Maurya, R. Singh, Joginder Singh, R. Nigam, W. Hasan, A. Kumar
{"title":"新型杀虫剂对芥菜蚜的防治效果研究","authors":"Nand Kishor Maurya, R. Singh, Joginder Singh, R. Nigam, W. Hasan, A. Kumar","doi":"10.46492/ijai/2018.3.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An examination was carried out to study in randomized block design with three replications at Crop Research Centre, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut during rabi 2014-15, the evaluation of novel insecticides viz., imidadoprid, acephate, chlorpyriphos, fipronil, thiamethoxam, dimethoate, and pymetrozine, against L. erysimi revealed that all the treatments schedule proved better than control at all the time intervals after each spray. The thiamethoxam 25% WG @100 g/ha was found most effective treatment in reducing the aphids population followed by acephate 75 SP @ 500g/ha. The pymetrozine 50 WG @ 250 g/ha was recorded less effective. Among conventional insecticides imidadoprid 17.8 SL @ 150 ml/ha was found more effective than dimethoate 30% EC @ 1000 ml/ha and fipronil 5 SC @ 1000 ml/ha. The higher yield was obtained from thiamethoxam 25% WG @100 g/ha with (17.15 q/ha) whereas, highest cost benefit ratio is obtained from imidadoprid 17.8 SL @ 150 ml/ha with (1:9.54).","PeriodicalId":250014,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agricultural Invention","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of novel insecticides against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach)\",\"authors\":\"Nand Kishor Maurya, R. Singh, Joginder Singh, R. Nigam, W. Hasan, A. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.46492/ijai/2018.3.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An examination was carried out to study in randomized block design with three replications at Crop Research Centre, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut during rabi 2014-15, the evaluation of novel insecticides viz., imidadoprid, acephate, chlorpyriphos, fipronil, thiamethoxam, dimethoate, and pymetrozine, against L. erysimi revealed that all the treatments schedule proved better than control at all the time intervals after each spray. The thiamethoxam 25% WG @100 g/ha was found most effective treatment in reducing the aphids population followed by acephate 75 SP @ 500g/ha. The pymetrozine 50 WG @ 250 g/ha was recorded less effective. Among conventional insecticides imidadoprid 17.8 SL @ 150 ml/ha was found more effective than dimethoate 30% EC @ 1000 ml/ha and fipronil 5 SC @ 1000 ml/ha. The higher yield was obtained from thiamethoxam 25% WG @100 g/ha with (17.15 q/ha) whereas, highest cost benefit ratio is obtained from imidadoprid 17.8 SL @ 150 ml/ha with (1:9.54).\",\"PeriodicalId\":250014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Agricultural Invention\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Agricultural Invention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46492/ijai/2018.3.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agricultural Invention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46492/ijai/2018.3.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

2014- 2015年12月,在印度密鲁特市帕特尔农业技术大学作物研究中心,采用随机区组设计,采用3个重复试验,对新型杀虫剂吡虫啉、乙酰甲胺磷、毒死蜱、氟虫腈、噻虫嗪、乐果乐和吡虫嗪的防治效果进行了评价,结果表明,在每次喷洒后的所有时间间隔内,各处理方案均优于对照。噻虫嗪25% WG @100 g/ha对减少蚜虫数量最有效,其次是乙酰甲胺磷75 SP @ 500g/ha。pymetrozine 50wg @ 250 g/ha的效果较差。在常规杀虫剂中,咪唑脲17.8 SL @ 150 ml/ha比乐果30% EC @ 1000 ml/ha和氟虫腈5 SC @ 1000 ml/ha更有效。噻虫嗪25% WG @100 g/ha与(17.15 q/ha)的产量最高,而咪唑唑啉17.8 SL @ 150 ml/ha与(1:9.54)的成本效益比最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of novel insecticides against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach)
An examination was carried out to study in randomized block design with three replications at Crop Research Centre, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut during rabi 2014-15, the evaluation of novel insecticides viz., imidadoprid, acephate, chlorpyriphos, fipronil, thiamethoxam, dimethoate, and pymetrozine, against L. erysimi revealed that all the treatments schedule proved better than control at all the time intervals after each spray. The thiamethoxam 25% WG @100 g/ha was found most effective treatment in reducing the aphids population followed by acephate 75 SP @ 500g/ha. The pymetrozine 50 WG @ 250 g/ha was recorded less effective. Among conventional insecticides imidadoprid 17.8 SL @ 150 ml/ha was found more effective than dimethoate 30% EC @ 1000 ml/ha and fipronil 5 SC @ 1000 ml/ha. The higher yield was obtained from thiamethoxam 25% WG @100 g/ha with (17.15 q/ha) whereas, highest cost benefit ratio is obtained from imidadoprid 17.8 SL @ 150 ml/ha with (1:9.54).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A study on water seepage losses for ponds and reservoirs In-situ trash management induced sustainability of soil health to produce the qualitative products Value chain analysis of turmeric subsector in Surkhet district of Nepal Estimation of heterosis for some traits in Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) in Central Uttar Pradesh Genotype x environment interaction analysis in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1