布鲁塞尔规则对混合争议解决条款的适用性

N. K. Okyay
{"title":"布鲁塞尔规则对混合争议解决条款的适用性","authors":"N. K. Okyay","doi":"10.1163/27725650-03010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe hybrid clause is an optional dispute resolution clause that offers the parties to a contract, for resolving their dispute, an option between state courts and arbitral tribunals. The combination of two different dispute resolution mechanisms, litigation and arbitration, raises the issue of determining the international or regional instruments applicable to this clause, such as Brussels I bis Regulation. As a matter of fact, the Recast of Brussels I Regulation, in line with its predecessors, excludes arbitration from its material scope. Since the hybrid clause contains an option to arbitrate, this exclusion raises the question of the applicability of the Regulation to this form of optional dispute resolution clause.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"2447 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Applicability of the Brussels I bis Regulation to Hybrid Dispute Resolution Clauses\",\"authors\":\"N. K. Okyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/27725650-03010003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe hybrid clause is an optional dispute resolution clause that offers the parties to a contract, for resolving their dispute, an option between state courts and arbitral tribunals. The combination of two different dispute resolution mechanisms, litigation and arbitration, raises the issue of determining the international or regional instruments applicable to this clause, such as Brussels I bis Regulation. As a matter of fact, the Recast of Brussels I Regulation, in line with its predecessors, excludes arbitration from its material scope. Since the hybrid clause contains an option to arbitrate, this exclusion raises the question of the applicability of the Regulation to this form of optional dispute resolution clause.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"2447 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混合条款是一项可选的争议解决条款,它为合同各方在州法院和仲裁法庭之间解决争议提供了一种选择。诉讼和仲裁这两种不同的争端解决机制的结合,提出了确定适用于这一条款的国际或区域文书的问题,例如《布鲁塞尔规则》。事实上,《布鲁塞尔规则》的修订与其前身一致,将仲裁排除在其实质性范围之外。由于混合条款包含仲裁选项,这一排除提出了《规则》是否适用于这种形式的可选争议解决条款的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Applicability of the Brussels I bis Regulation to Hybrid Dispute Resolution Clauses
The hybrid clause is an optional dispute resolution clause that offers the parties to a contract, for resolving their dispute, an option between state courts and arbitral tribunals. The combination of two different dispute resolution mechanisms, litigation and arbitration, raises the issue of determining the international or regional instruments applicable to this clause, such as Brussels I bis Regulation. As a matter of fact, the Recast of Brussels I Regulation, in line with its predecessors, excludes arbitration from its material scope. Since the hybrid clause contains an option to arbitrate, this exclusion raises the question of the applicability of the Regulation to this form of optional dispute resolution clause.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Victim Status of Individuals in Climate Change Litigation before the ECtHR State Immunity from Civil Jurisdiction in Transboundary Environmental Litigations The Deterrent Effect of Financial Sanctions Pursuant to Article 260(2) tfeu in the Context of Violations of Environmental Obligations Authorisations to Emit Greenhouse Gases – A Conflict-of-Laws Perspective Upholding Maritime Migrants’ Rights at the Borders of Europe – J.A. and Others v. Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1