监管机构的规范性权力和最高法院对可理解原则的承认

A. Arigony
{"title":"监管机构的规范性权力和最高法院对可理解原则的承认","authors":"A. Arigony","doi":"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory agencies exercise normative power on the basis of legal norms that, in a broad and abstract way, provide for what the doctrine has agreed to call intelligible principles. The intelligible principles only establish parameters and objectives to be achieved by the regulatory agency. The legislator only fixes beacons to the regulatory agency, although broad, sometimes based only on standards. There is a certain tension of intelligible principles with the classical meaning of the principle of legality, which provides that Public Administration cannot have any room for creation. Thus, some administrative authors consider this legislative technique unconstitutional. They advocate a maximalist view of the law: administrative entities should only enforce the law. This article demonstrates that the use of intelligible principles is constitutional and in line with current reality, and that there are other control mechanisms of the Public Administration.","PeriodicalId":346094,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O poder normativo das agências reguladoras e o reconhecimento dos princípios inteligíveis pelo STF\",\"authors\":\"A. Arigony\",\"doi\":\"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regulatory agencies exercise normative power on the basis of legal norms that, in a broad and abstract way, provide for what the doctrine has agreed to call intelligible principles. The intelligible principles only establish parameters and objectives to be achieved by the regulatory agency. The legislator only fixes beacons to the regulatory agency, although broad, sometimes based only on standards. There is a certain tension of intelligible principles with the classical meaning of the principle of legality, which provides that Public Administration cannot have any room for creation. Thus, some administrative authors consider this legislative technique unconstitutional. They advocate a maximalist view of the law: administrative entities should only enforce the law. This article demonstrates that the use of intelligible principles is constitutional and in line with current reality, and that there are other control mechanisms of the Public Administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

监管机构在法律规范的基础上行使规范性权力,这些法律规范以一种广泛而抽象的方式规定了该学说所同意的可理解原则。可理解的原则只确立了监管机构要实现的参数和目标。立法者只向监管机构确定信标,尽管范围很广,有时只基于标准。具有合法性原则经典意义的可理解原则之间存在一定的张力,这就规定了公共行政不能有任何创造的余地。因此,一些行政作者认为这种立法方法违宪。他们主张一种最大限度的法律观点:行政实体应该只执行法律。本文论证了使用可理解原则是符合宪法的,符合当前的现实,而且公共行政还有其他的控制机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O poder normativo das agências reguladoras e o reconhecimento dos princípios inteligíveis pelo STF
Regulatory agencies exercise normative power on the basis of legal norms that, in a broad and abstract way, provide for what the doctrine has agreed to call intelligible principles. The intelligible principles only establish parameters and objectives to be achieved by the regulatory agency. The legislator only fixes beacons to the regulatory agency, although broad, sometimes based only on standards. There is a certain tension of intelligible principles with the classical meaning of the principle of legality, which provides that Public Administration cannot have any room for creation. Thus, some administrative authors consider this legislative technique unconstitutional. They advocate a maximalist view of the law: administrative entities should only enforce the law. This article demonstrates that the use of intelligible principles is constitutional and in line with current reality, and that there are other control mechanisms of the Public Administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incompletude em contratos de concessão: ainda a teoria da imprevisão?* Procedimentos probatórios autônomos como instrumentos de acertamento fático e fomento ao consenso – breve análise das inovações trazidas pelo art. 381 do novo Código de Processo Civil Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF Direito em tempos de crise: o que as contratações públicas podem aprender com a pandemia de COVID-19 O exercício das funções da advocacia pública como atividade exclusiva dos advogados públicos efetivos: uma releitura da Proposta de Súmula Vinculante nº 18 do STF à luz dos dados publicados no 1º Diagnóstico de Advocacia Pública Municipal no Brasil (2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1