从法律到业务流程:减少法律专业人员和业务流程分析师之间的技能差距

A. Guido, Roberto Paiano, Andrea Pandurino
{"title":"从法律到业务流程:减少法律专业人员和业务流程分析师之间的技能差距","authors":"A. Guido, Roberto Paiano, Andrea Pandurino","doi":"10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The communication between specialists who use different terminologies based on their expertise is a notable problem in all sectors. When legal professional and business process analyst have to exchange know-how, it is very difficult to find a common vocabulary because the cultural background of the actors is completely different. Moreover, some experts take for granted basic concepts that are not known by other experts or are known with a different semantic meaning, thus creating significant information gaps that affect all analysis tasks. The problem described above is presented in the HSEPGEST project. The project aims to create a coherent information system able to harmonize the many European, national, and local laws and regulations on health, safety, and the environmental protection. The resulting information system implements the concepts present in these laws and regulations and could be easily adapted to the frequent changes of the concepts. This paper proposes some helpful guidelines that will be used by legal professionals. The guidelines can be used as a tool to schematically describe existing laws and regulations in order to make them simpler to understand for business process analysts who will take care of the design of the information system. The guidelines seek, in short, to bridge the skill gap between legal professionals and business process analysts.","PeriodicalId":161782,"journal":{"name":"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From laws to business process: Reducing the skill gap between legal professional and business process analyst\",\"authors\":\"A. Guido, Roberto Paiano, Andrea Pandurino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The communication between specialists who use different terminologies based on their expertise is a notable problem in all sectors. When legal professional and business process analyst have to exchange know-how, it is very difficult to find a common vocabulary because the cultural background of the actors is completely different. Moreover, some experts take for granted basic concepts that are not known by other experts or are known with a different semantic meaning, thus creating significant information gaps that affect all analysis tasks. The problem described above is presented in the HSEPGEST project. The project aims to create a coherent information system able to harmonize the many European, national, and local laws and regulations on health, safety, and the environmental protection. The resulting information system implements the concepts present in these laws and regulations and could be easily adapted to the frequent changes of the concepts. This paper proposes some helpful guidelines that will be used by legal professionals. The guidelines can be used as a tool to schematically describe existing laws and regulations in order to make them simpler to understand for business process analysts who will take care of the design of the information system. The guidelines seek, in short, to bridge the skill gap between legal professionals and business process analysts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

根据专业知识使用不同术语的专家之间的沟通在所有部门都是一个值得注意的问题。当法律专业人员和业务流程分析人员必须进行专业知识交流时,由于参与者的文化背景完全不同,很难找到一个共同的词汇。此外,一些专家认为其他专家不知道的基本概念是理所当然的,或者以不同的语义知道,从而产生影响所有分析任务的重大信息差距。上述问题出现在HSEPGEST项目中。该项目旨在建立一个连贯的信息系统,能够协调许多欧洲、国家和地方关于健康、安全和环境保护的法律和法规。由此产生的信息系统实现了这些法律法规中存在的概念,并且可以很容易地适应这些概念的频繁变化。本文提出了一些有用的指导方针,供法律专业人员使用。这些指导方针可以用作一种工具,以示意图方式描述现有的法律和法规,以便使负责信息系统设计的业务流程分析人员更容易理解这些法律和法规。简而言之,这些指导方针旨在弥合法律专业人员和业务流程分析师之间的技能差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From laws to business process: Reducing the skill gap between legal professional and business process analyst
The communication between specialists who use different terminologies based on their expertise is a notable problem in all sectors. When legal professional and business process analyst have to exchange know-how, it is very difficult to find a common vocabulary because the cultural background of the actors is completely different. Moreover, some experts take for granted basic concepts that are not known by other experts or are known with a different semantic meaning, thus creating significant information gaps that affect all analysis tasks. The problem described above is presented in the HSEPGEST project. The project aims to create a coherent information system able to harmonize the many European, national, and local laws and regulations on health, safety, and the environmental protection. The resulting information system implements the concepts present in these laws and regulations and could be easily adapted to the frequent changes of the concepts. This paper proposes some helpful guidelines that will be used by legal professionals. The guidelines can be used as a tool to schematically describe existing laws and regulations in order to make them simpler to understand for business process analysts who will take care of the design of the information system. The guidelines seek, in short, to bridge the skill gap between legal professionals and business process analysts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IOT enabled sensor in multimodal intelligent applications for children with special needs Reconfigurable neurons - making the most of configurable logic blocks (CLBs) A self-report study that gauges perceived and induced emotion with music Template matching for noisy images Physical layer network coding with two-way relay free space optical communication link
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1