超越文件:可视化非正式沟通

Kurt Schneider, Kai Stapel, Eric Knauss
{"title":"超越文件:可视化非正式沟通","authors":"Kurt Schneider, Kai Stapel, Eric Knauss","doi":"10.1109/REV.2008.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements engineering heavily relies on oral and informal communication like meetings, phone calls, and e-mails. Some requirements are traditionally communicated outside formal documents in many companies. Considering document-based communication only is, therefore, not sufficient. Communication beyond documents should be taken into account when a company wants to improve its requirements engineering practices. We present a notation for visualizing the flow of requirements, explicitly including both informal and document-based communication. An example illustrates the notation by applying it to eliciting and validating security requirements. We compare our visualization approach for flows of requirements to related notations. The comparison shows how differences in notations affect the ability to model essential concepts of our approach. Explicitly modeling flows beyond documents provides new opportunities for requirement awareness, process improvement and innovation of tools and techniques.","PeriodicalId":429417,"journal":{"name":"2008 Requirements Engineering Visualization","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Documents: Visualizing Informal Communication\",\"authors\":\"Kurt Schneider, Kai Stapel, Eric Knauss\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REV.2008.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Requirements engineering heavily relies on oral and informal communication like meetings, phone calls, and e-mails. Some requirements are traditionally communicated outside formal documents in many companies. Considering document-based communication only is, therefore, not sufficient. Communication beyond documents should be taken into account when a company wants to improve its requirements engineering practices. We present a notation for visualizing the flow of requirements, explicitly including both informal and document-based communication. An example illustrates the notation by applying it to eliciting and validating security requirements. We compare our visualization approach for flows of requirements to related notations. The comparison shows how differences in notations affect the ability to model essential concepts of our approach. Explicitly modeling flows beyond documents provides new opportunities for requirement awareness, process improvement and innovation of tools and techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Requirements Engineering Visualization\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Requirements Engineering Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2008.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Requirements Engineering Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2008.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

需求工程在很大程度上依赖于口头和非正式的交流,比如会议、电话和电子邮件。在许多公司中,一些需求传统上是在正式文件之外进行沟通的。因此,仅仅考虑基于文档的通信是不够的。当公司想要改进其需求工程实践时,应该考虑文档之外的交流。我们提出了一种用于可视化需求流的符号,明确地包括非正式的和基于文档的通信。一个示例通过将该符号应用于引出和验证安全需求来说明该符号。我们将需求流的可视化方法与相关的符号进行比较。这个比较显示了符号的差异如何影响我们方法中基本概念的建模能力。在文档之外显式地建模流为需求意识、过程改进以及工具和技术的创新提供了新的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond Documents: Visualizing Informal Communication
Requirements engineering heavily relies on oral and informal communication like meetings, phone calls, and e-mails. Some requirements are traditionally communicated outside formal documents in many companies. Considering document-based communication only is, therefore, not sufficient. Communication beyond documents should be taken into account when a company wants to improve its requirements engineering practices. We present a notation for visualizing the flow of requirements, explicitly including both informal and document-based communication. An example illustrates the notation by applying it to eliciting and validating security requirements. We compare our visualization approach for flows of requirements to related notations. The comparison shows how differences in notations affect the ability to model essential concepts of our approach. Explicitly modeling flows beyond documents provides new opportunities for requirement awareness, process improvement and innovation of tools and techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Graph-based Visualization of Requirements Relationships Modelling Trust Requirements by Means of a Visualization Language Visual Strawman to Relate Program RE to Project RE On Usability in Requirements Trace Visualizations Beyond Documents: Visualizing Informal Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1