行人子系统安全试验的碰撞器与全尺寸假人试验的比较。In:行人安全

Yasuhiro Matsui, A. Wittek, A. Konosu
{"title":"行人子系统安全试验的碰撞器与全尺寸假人试验的比较。In:行人安全","authors":"Yasuhiro Matsui, A. Wittek, A. Konosu","doi":"10.4271/2002-01-1021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study had two objectives: to clarify the differences between the injury related responses of full scale pedestrian dummy and results of sub-system tests obtained under impact conditions simulating car-pedestrian accidents; and to propose modifications of current sub-systems test methods. The study results demonstrate, using compact car and sport utility vehicles, that the headform and upper legform test procedures may overestimate severity of impact between car front and pedestrian head and pelvis, especially for SUVs. Additionally, the current legform impactor may not be suitable for evaluation of the aggressiveness of a high bumper car front.","PeriodicalId":291036,"journal":{"name":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF PEDESTRIAN SUBSYSTEM SAFETY TESTS USING IMPACTORS AND FULL-SCALE DUMMY TESTS. IN: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Matsui, A. Wittek, A. Konosu\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/2002-01-1021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study had two objectives: to clarify the differences between the injury related responses of full scale pedestrian dummy and results of sub-system tests obtained under impact conditions simulating car-pedestrian accidents; and to propose modifications of current sub-systems test methods. The study results demonstrate, using compact car and sport utility vehicles, that the headform and upper legform test procedures may overestimate severity of impact between car front and pedestrian head and pelvis, especially for SUVs. Additionally, the current legform impactor may not be suitable for evaluation of the aggressiveness of a high bumper car front.\",\"PeriodicalId\":291036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-1021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-1021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

该研究有两个目的:澄清全尺寸行人假人在模拟汽车-行人碰撞条件下的伤害相关反应与子系统测试结果之间的差异;并对现有的子系统测试方法提出修改意见。研究结果表明,使用紧凑型汽车和运动型多用途车,头部和腿部上部测试程序可能高估了汽车前部与行人头部和骨盆之间碰撞的严重程度,特别是对于suv。此外,目前的腿形冲击器可能不适合评估一个高碰碰车正面的侵略性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARISON OF PEDESTRIAN SUBSYSTEM SAFETY TESTS USING IMPACTORS AND FULL-SCALE DUMMY TESTS. IN: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
The study had two objectives: to clarify the differences between the injury related responses of full scale pedestrian dummy and results of sub-system tests obtained under impact conditions simulating car-pedestrian accidents; and to propose modifications of current sub-systems test methods. The study results demonstrate, using compact car and sport utility vehicles, that the headform and upper legform test procedures may overestimate severity of impact between car front and pedestrian head and pelvis, especially for SUVs. Additionally, the current legform impactor may not be suitable for evaluation of the aggressiveness of a high bumper car front.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INNOVATIVE CHIP SET FOR PRESSURE AND ACCELERATION BASED AIRBAG SOLUTIONS. IN: AIR BAGS AND BELT RESTRAINTS A STUDY OF DRIVER'S MANEUVER CHARACTERISTICS USING THE JOY-STICK DEVICE. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT BOUNCE-OVERS: FIXED OBJECT IMPACTS FOLLOWED BY ROLLOVERS. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS EVALUATION OF A VOICE-ACTIVATED SYSTEM USING A DRIVING SIMULATOR. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT HOW TO USE PC-CRASH TO SIMULATE ROLLOVER CRASHES. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1