机器人技术在审计行业的应用

Tebogo Sethibe, Evaashan Naidoo
{"title":"机器人技术在审计行业的应用","authors":"Tebogo Sethibe, Evaashan Naidoo","doi":"10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The auditing profession has been burdened with high costs and reputational damage resulting from false results because of a high dependency on manual tasks susceptible to errors or manipulation. Automating repetitive tasks with the use of robots can help minimise these errors to achieve efficiencies and cost reduction.Objectives: This study adopted a Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to determine the factors influencing organisations to use robotics technology when performing auditing activities.Methods: The study was quantitative, using a survey consisting of 37 questionnaires and two semi-structured interview questions. The sample consisted of 59 professional auditors and 26 non-auditors involved in auditing in South Africa.Results: The study results show that performance expectancy and facilitating conditions are key factors that influence the adoption of robotics in the auditing profession. A lack of training, data quality, and inadequate investment in robotics technology are mentioned as critical barriers to adopting robotics in auditing. Management support, good change management processes and technology skills are quoted as potential key enablers of robotics technology in the auditing profession.Conclusion: The conclusion drawn from the study is twofold. Firstly, the performance management system and the business case for robotics in the auditing process should be linked to the tasks of auditors. Secondly, resources should be made available to support the use of technology in the profession. The study provides more insight into how leaders and management in the auditing profession could influence the adoption of robotics in auditing.","PeriodicalId":331290,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Information Management","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The adoption of robotics in the auditing profession\",\"authors\":\"Tebogo Sethibe, Evaashan Naidoo\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The auditing profession has been burdened with high costs and reputational damage resulting from false results because of a high dependency on manual tasks susceptible to errors or manipulation. Automating repetitive tasks with the use of robots can help minimise these errors to achieve efficiencies and cost reduction.Objectives: This study adopted a Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to determine the factors influencing organisations to use robotics technology when performing auditing activities.Methods: The study was quantitative, using a survey consisting of 37 questionnaires and two semi-structured interview questions. The sample consisted of 59 professional auditors and 26 non-auditors involved in auditing in South Africa.Results: The study results show that performance expectancy and facilitating conditions are key factors that influence the adoption of robotics in the auditing profession. A lack of training, data quality, and inadequate investment in robotics technology are mentioned as critical barriers to adopting robotics in auditing. Management support, good change management processes and technology skills are quoted as potential key enablers of robotics technology in the auditing profession.Conclusion: The conclusion drawn from the study is twofold. Firstly, the performance management system and the business case for robotics in the auditing process should be linked to the tasks of auditors. Secondly, resources should be made available to support the use of technology in the profession. The study provides more insight into how leaders and management in the auditing profession could influence the adoption of robotics in auditing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Journal of Information Management\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Journal of Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于高度依赖于容易出错或操纵的手工任务,审计行业一直背负着高成本和因虚假结果而造成的声誉损害。使用机器人自动化重复任务可以帮助最大限度地减少这些错误,从而实现效率和降低成本。目的:本研究采用技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)模型来确定影响组织在执行审计活动时使用机器人技术的因素。方法:采用定量调查方法,采用37份问卷和2个半结构化访谈问题。样本包括在南非从事审计工作的59名专业审计员和26名非审计员。结果:研究结果表明,绩效预期和促进条件是影响机器人技术在审计行业应用的关键因素。缺乏培训、数据质量和对机器人技术的投资不足被认为是在审计中采用机器人技术的关键障碍。管理支持、良好的变更管理流程和技术技能被认为是审计行业中机器人技术的潜在关键推动因素。结论:从研究中得出的结论是双重的。首先,审计过程中的绩效管理系统和机器人业务案例应该与审计人员的任务联系起来。第二,应提供资源以支持在专业中使用技术。该研究为审计行业的领导者和管理层如何影响机器人技术在审计中的应用提供了更多的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The adoption of robotics in the auditing profession
Background: The auditing profession has been burdened with high costs and reputational damage resulting from false results because of a high dependency on manual tasks susceptible to errors or manipulation. Automating repetitive tasks with the use of robots can help minimise these errors to achieve efficiencies and cost reduction.Objectives: This study adopted a Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to determine the factors influencing organisations to use robotics technology when performing auditing activities.Methods: The study was quantitative, using a survey consisting of 37 questionnaires and two semi-structured interview questions. The sample consisted of 59 professional auditors and 26 non-auditors involved in auditing in South Africa.Results: The study results show that performance expectancy and facilitating conditions are key factors that influence the adoption of robotics in the auditing profession. A lack of training, data quality, and inadequate investment in robotics technology are mentioned as critical barriers to adopting robotics in auditing. Management support, good change management processes and technology skills are quoted as potential key enablers of robotics technology in the auditing profession.Conclusion: The conclusion drawn from the study is twofold. Firstly, the performance management system and the business case for robotics in the auditing process should be linked to the tasks of auditors. Secondly, resources should be made available to support the use of technology in the profession. The study provides more insight into how leaders and management in the auditing profession could influence the adoption of robotics in auditing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of perceived value of information disclosure on gaming motives and mobile game play Digital consumer perspectives on data access in an emerging market Knowledge transfer: Graduates’ capability to demonstrate and produce business innovation Use of indigenous knowledge to control potato pests in Umzimkhulu Local Municipality Learning Management Systems as a platform for information sharing during the COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1