光学透明平视显示器对真实世界物体深度判断的影响

Missie Smith, Nadejda Doutcheva, Joseph L. Gabbard, G. Burnett
{"title":"光学透明平视显示器对真实世界物体深度判断的影响","authors":"Missie Smith, Nadejda Doutcheva, Joseph L. Gabbard, G. Burnett","doi":"10.1109/VR.2015.7223465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research indicates that users consistently underestimate depth judgments to Augmented Reality (AR) graphics when viewed through optical see-through displays. However, to our knowledge, little work has examined how AR graphics may affect depth judgments of real world objects that have been overlaid or annotated with AR graphics. This study begins a preliminary analysis whether AR graphics have directional effects on users' depth perception of real-world objects, as might be experienced in vehicle driving scenarios (e.g., as viewed via an optical see-through head-up display or HUD). Twenty-four participants were asked to judge the depth of a physical pedestrian proxy figure moving towards them at a constant rate of 1 meter/second. Participants were shown an initial target location that varied in distance from 11 to 20 m and were then asked to press a button to indicate when the moving target was perceived to be at the previously specified target location. Each participant experienced three different display conditions: no AR visual display (control), a conformal AR graphic overlaid on the pedestrian via a HUD, and the same graphic presented on a tablet physically located on the pedestrian. Participants completed 10 trials (one for each target distance between 11 and 20 inclusive) per display condition for a total of 30 trials per participant. The judged distance from the correct location was recorded, and after each trial, participants' confidence in determining the correct distance was captured. Across all conditions, participants underestimated the distance of the physical object consistent with existing literature. Greater variability was observed in the accuracy of distance judgments under the AR HUD condition relative to the other two display conditions. In addition, participant confidence levels were considerably lower in the AR HUD condition.","PeriodicalId":231501,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical see-through head up displays' effect on depth judgments of real world objects\",\"authors\":\"Missie Smith, Nadejda Doutcheva, Joseph L. Gabbard, G. Burnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VR.2015.7223465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent research indicates that users consistently underestimate depth judgments to Augmented Reality (AR) graphics when viewed through optical see-through displays. However, to our knowledge, little work has examined how AR graphics may affect depth judgments of real world objects that have been overlaid or annotated with AR graphics. This study begins a preliminary analysis whether AR graphics have directional effects on users' depth perception of real-world objects, as might be experienced in vehicle driving scenarios (e.g., as viewed via an optical see-through head-up display or HUD). Twenty-four participants were asked to judge the depth of a physical pedestrian proxy figure moving towards them at a constant rate of 1 meter/second. Participants were shown an initial target location that varied in distance from 11 to 20 m and were then asked to press a button to indicate when the moving target was perceived to be at the previously specified target location. Each participant experienced three different display conditions: no AR visual display (control), a conformal AR graphic overlaid on the pedestrian via a HUD, and the same graphic presented on a tablet physically located on the pedestrian. Participants completed 10 trials (one for each target distance between 11 and 20 inclusive) per display condition for a total of 30 trials per participant. The judged distance from the correct location was recorded, and after each trial, participants' confidence in determining the correct distance was captured. Across all conditions, participants underestimated the distance of the physical object consistent with existing literature. Greater variability was observed in the accuracy of distance judgments under the AR HUD condition relative to the other two display conditions. In addition, participant confidence levels were considerably lower in the AR HUD condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

最近的研究表明,当用户通过光学透明显示器观看增强现实(AR)图像时,他们总是低估深度判断。然而,据我们所知,很少有研究研究AR图形如何影响用AR图形覆盖或注释的现实世界对象的深度判断。这项研究开始初步分析AR图形是否对用户对现实世界物体的深度感知有方向性影响,就像在车辆驾驶场景中可能经历的那样(例如,通过光学透明抬头显示器或HUD观看)。24名参与者被要求判断一个以1米/秒的恒定速度向他们移动的行人替身的深度。研究人员向参与者展示了一个距离从11米到20米不等的初始目标位置,然后要求他们按下一个按钮,以表明当移动目标被感知到在先前指定的目标位置时。每个参与者都经历了三种不同的显示条件:没有AR视觉显示(控制),通过HUD覆盖在行人上的保形AR图形,以及在行人身上的平板电脑上显示相同的图形。每个显示条件下,参与者完成10次试验(11 ~ 20个目标距离各1次),每个参与者共30次试验。从正确位置判断的距离被记录下来,并且在每次试验之后,参与者对确定正确距离的信心被捕获。在所有条件下,参与者都低估了与现有文献一致的物理物体的距离。与其他两种显示条件相比,AR HUD条件下距离判断的准确性变化更大。此外,在AR HUD条件下,参与者的信心水平明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optical see-through head up displays' effect on depth judgments of real world objects
Recent research indicates that users consistently underestimate depth judgments to Augmented Reality (AR) graphics when viewed through optical see-through displays. However, to our knowledge, little work has examined how AR graphics may affect depth judgments of real world objects that have been overlaid or annotated with AR graphics. This study begins a preliminary analysis whether AR graphics have directional effects on users' depth perception of real-world objects, as might be experienced in vehicle driving scenarios (e.g., as viewed via an optical see-through head-up display or HUD). Twenty-four participants were asked to judge the depth of a physical pedestrian proxy figure moving towards them at a constant rate of 1 meter/second. Participants were shown an initial target location that varied in distance from 11 to 20 m and were then asked to press a button to indicate when the moving target was perceived to be at the previously specified target location. Each participant experienced three different display conditions: no AR visual display (control), a conformal AR graphic overlaid on the pedestrian via a HUD, and the same graphic presented on a tablet physically located on the pedestrian. Participants completed 10 trials (one for each target distance between 11 and 20 inclusive) per display condition for a total of 30 trials per participant. The judged distance from the correct location was recorded, and after each trial, participants' confidence in determining the correct distance was captured. Across all conditions, participants underestimated the distance of the physical object consistent with existing literature. Greater variability was observed in the accuracy of distance judgments under the AR HUD condition relative to the other two display conditions. In addition, participant confidence levels were considerably lower in the AR HUD condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘IXV-trajectory’ and ‘IXV-asset’: Virtual reality applications for the aerothermodynamics analysis of IXV Blind in a virtual world: Mobility-training virtual reality games for users who are blind GPU-accelerated attention map generation for dynamic 3D scenes The role of dimensional symmetry on bimanual psychomotor skills education in immersive virtual environments Various forms of tactile feedback displayed on the back of the tablet: Latency minimized by using audio signal to control actuators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1