货币黄金原则与成员国的责任

C. Samara
{"title":"货币黄金原则与成员国的责任","authors":"C. Samara","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3450156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Monetary Gold Principle is closely related to the concept of international responsibility. According to the ICJ Judgment (1954) in the Case of the Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943, the Court should not exercise its jurisdiction to adjudicate in a case between two parties, when the legal interests of a third party “would not only be affected by the decision, but would form the very subject matter of the decision”. This paper attempts to find out if the Monetary Gold Principle can be applied if the third party is an international organizations and how it is connected to the member states responsibility.","PeriodicalId":371849,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Jurisdictional Issues (Topic)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Monetary Gold Principle and the Member States Responsibility\",\"authors\":\"C. Samara\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3450156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Monetary Gold Principle is closely related to the concept of international responsibility. According to the ICJ Judgment (1954) in the Case of the Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943, the Court should not exercise its jurisdiction to adjudicate in a case between two parties, when the legal interests of a third party “would not only be affected by the decision, but would form the very subject matter of the decision”. This paper attempts to find out if the Monetary Gold Principle can be applied if the third party is an international organizations and how it is connected to the member states responsibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: International Jurisdictional Issues (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: International Jurisdictional Issues (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3450156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Jurisdictional Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3450156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黄金货币原则与国际责任的概念密切相关。根据国际法院对1943年从罗马运走的货币黄金一案的判决(1954年),法院不应在双方当事人之间的案件中行使其管辖权,因为第三方的法律利益“不仅会受到决定的影响,而且会构成决定的主题事项”。本文试图探讨在第三方为国际组织的情况下,货币金本位原则是否可以适用,以及如何与成员国的责任相联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Monetary Gold Principle and the Member States Responsibility
The Monetary Gold Principle is closely related to the concept of international responsibility. According to the ICJ Judgment (1954) in the Case of the Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943, the Court should not exercise its jurisdiction to adjudicate in a case between two parties, when the legal interests of a third party “would not only be affected by the decision, but would form the very subject matter of the decision”. This paper attempts to find out if the Monetary Gold Principle can be applied if the third party is an international organizations and how it is connected to the member states responsibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Monetary Gold Principle and the Member States Responsibility The Perception of the EU Legal Order in International Law: An In- and Outside View Hungarian Cases Before ICSID Tribunals: The Hungarian Experience with Investment Arbitration International Space Law Differing Perceptions? Market Practice and the Evolution of Foreign Sovereign Immunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1