专业服务公司的知识管理工具包增强

Lameshnee Govender, M. Mearns, T. Du Plessis
{"title":"专业服务公司的知识管理工具包增强","authors":"Lameshnee Govender, M. Mearns, T. Du Plessis","doi":"10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Professional services firms utilise knowledge management tools, for example, IBM and Oracle solutions and toolkits, in their day-to-day client-facing operations. The effectiveness of toolkits must be evaluated to establish their actual value.Objectives: This article evaluates the current toolkit used by the South African client-facing professionals of a global multinational corporation.Method: Pragmatism philosophy was used because of the various perspectives needed to interpret the data. Data were collected from 30 participants who adhered to sample eligibility criteria. An interview was used to collect data to help determine which tools worked well and what had to be improved on.Results: The most value-adding tool was the Experience Tool, whereas the Collaboration Tool ranked the least valuable. The Collaboration Tool showed the most potential to increase its value. The results gave a clear indication of areas of improvement that will enable a professional services firm to strategically position its knowledge management toolkit towards adding value for client engagements.Conclusion: The study contributes towards evaluating the knowledge management toolkit, analysing areas of improvement, and recommending components such as machine learning, online collaboration and other activities that would enhance the knowledge management toolkit.","PeriodicalId":331290,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Information Management","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge management toolkit enhancement for a professional services firm\",\"authors\":\"Lameshnee Govender, M. Mearns, T. Du Plessis\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Professional services firms utilise knowledge management tools, for example, IBM and Oracle solutions and toolkits, in their day-to-day client-facing operations. The effectiveness of toolkits must be evaluated to establish their actual value.Objectives: This article evaluates the current toolkit used by the South African client-facing professionals of a global multinational corporation.Method: Pragmatism philosophy was used because of the various perspectives needed to interpret the data. Data were collected from 30 participants who adhered to sample eligibility criteria. An interview was used to collect data to help determine which tools worked well and what had to be improved on.Results: The most value-adding tool was the Experience Tool, whereas the Collaboration Tool ranked the least valuable. The Collaboration Tool showed the most potential to increase its value. The results gave a clear indication of areas of improvement that will enable a professional services firm to strategically position its knowledge management toolkit towards adding value for client engagements.Conclusion: The study contributes towards evaluating the knowledge management toolkit, analysing areas of improvement, and recommending components such as machine learning, online collaboration and other activities that would enhance the knowledge management toolkit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Journal of Information Management\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Journal of Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:专业服务公司利用知识管理工具,例如,IBM和Oracle解决方案和工具包,在他们日常的面向客户的操作。必须评估工具包的有效性,以确定它们的实际价值。目的:本文评估了一家全球跨国公司的南非面向客户的专业人员目前使用的工具包。方法:采用实用主义哲学,因为需要从不同的角度来解释数据。数据收集自30名遵守样本资格标准的参与者。通过访谈来收集数据,以帮助确定哪些工具运行良好,哪些需要改进。结果:最有价值的工具是体验工具,而协作工具的价值最低。协作工具显示出最大的潜力来增加其价值。结果明确指出了需要改进的领域,这将使专业服务公司能够战略性地定位其知识管理工具包,为客户增加价值。结论:该研究有助于评估知识管理工具包,分析改进的领域,并推荐诸如机器学习,在线协作和其他活动等组件,以增强知识管理工具包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge management toolkit enhancement for a professional services firm
Background: Professional services firms utilise knowledge management tools, for example, IBM and Oracle solutions and toolkits, in their day-to-day client-facing operations. The effectiveness of toolkits must be evaluated to establish their actual value.Objectives: This article evaluates the current toolkit used by the South African client-facing professionals of a global multinational corporation.Method: Pragmatism philosophy was used because of the various perspectives needed to interpret the data. Data were collected from 30 participants who adhered to sample eligibility criteria. An interview was used to collect data to help determine which tools worked well and what had to be improved on.Results: The most value-adding tool was the Experience Tool, whereas the Collaboration Tool ranked the least valuable. The Collaboration Tool showed the most potential to increase its value. The results gave a clear indication of areas of improvement that will enable a professional services firm to strategically position its knowledge management toolkit towards adding value for client engagements.Conclusion: The study contributes towards evaluating the knowledge management toolkit, analysing areas of improvement, and recommending components such as machine learning, online collaboration and other activities that would enhance the knowledge management toolkit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of perceived value of information disclosure on gaming motives and mobile game play Digital consumer perspectives on data access in an emerging market Knowledge transfer: Graduates’ capability to demonstrate and produce business innovation Use of indigenous knowledge to control potato pests in Umzimkhulu Local Municipality Learning Management Systems as a platform for information sharing during the COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1