评估空调办公室可接受噪音声级的方法

Mcibse Mhkie
{"title":"评估空调办公室可接受噪音声级的方法","authors":"Mcibse Mhkie","doi":"10.1191/0143624406bse157tn","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the acceptable noise level in an office environment by interviewing 422 occupants about the aural environment being perceived in 61 air-conditioned offices in Hong Kong. The survey samples covered different types of building and prevalent mechanical air supply system. In particular, the measured equivalent continuous noise level Leq in the offices was chosen as an indicator and correlated with the subjective responses from occupants on a visual analogue assessment scale and a dichotomous assessment scale. The results showed that this acceptability was significantly influenced by the office noise level and it would be correlated with a logistic regression model. A satisfaction criterion of the noise level could be evaluated from the frequency distribution of the occupants’ response at certain Leq. In addition, the proposed satisfaction criterion of aural comfort in current design practice was confirmed by the survey samples: an indoor environment with an equivalent continuous noise level Leq of 57.5 dBA would be adopted as a design criterion for some offices. Practical application: The neutral criterion for aural comfort indicated by the equivalent continuous noise level Leq in air-conditioned offices was determined within the range of 45-70 dBA and the ‘optimum’ noise level La/57.5 dBA to be maintained in an office was determined from the survey. This study provides a template for applying a statistical frequency analysis and logistic regression model to examine the ‘optimum’ criteria for aural environment indicated by equivalent continuous noise level Leq in air-conditioned offices elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":272488,"journal":{"name":"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method of assessing the acceptability of noise levels in air-conditioned offices\",\"authors\":\"Mcibse Mhkie\",\"doi\":\"10.1191/0143624406bse157tn\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the acceptable noise level in an office environment by interviewing 422 occupants about the aural environment being perceived in 61 air-conditioned offices in Hong Kong. The survey samples covered different types of building and prevalent mechanical air supply system. In particular, the measured equivalent continuous noise level Leq in the offices was chosen as an indicator and correlated with the subjective responses from occupants on a visual analogue assessment scale and a dichotomous assessment scale. The results showed that this acceptability was significantly influenced by the office noise level and it would be correlated with a logistic regression model. A satisfaction criterion of the noise level could be evaluated from the frequency distribution of the occupants’ response at certain Leq. In addition, the proposed satisfaction criterion of aural comfort in current design practice was confirmed by the survey samples: an indoor environment with an equivalent continuous noise level Leq of 57.5 dBA would be adopted as a design criterion for some offices. Practical application: The neutral criterion for aural comfort indicated by the equivalent continuous noise level Leq in air-conditioned offices was determined within the range of 45-70 dBA and the ‘optimum’ noise level La/57.5 dBA to be maintained in an office was determined from the survey. This study provides a template for applying a statistical frequency analysis and logistic regression model to examine the ‘optimum’ criteria for aural environment indicated by equivalent continuous noise level Leq in air-conditioned offices elsewhere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624406bse157tn\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624406bse157tn","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

本研究就香港61间空调办公室内的听觉环境,采访了422名住户,以探讨办公室环境的可接受噪音水平。调查样本涵盖不同类型的建筑物和普遍的机械送风系统。特别地,在办公室中测量的等效连续噪声水平Leq作为一个指标,并在视觉模拟评估量表和二分评估量表上与居住者的主观反应相关联。结果表明,该可接受性受办公室噪音水平的显著影响,并与逻辑回归模型相关。噪声级的满足标准可由某一Leq下乘员响应的频率分布来确定。此外,调查样本也证实了当前设计实践中提出的听觉舒适满意度标准:一些办公室将采用等效连续噪声水平Leq为57.5 dBA的室内环境作为设计标准。实际应用:空调办公室的等效连续噪声水平Leq所表示的听觉舒适中性标准确定在45-70 dBA范围内,而办公室应保持的“最佳”噪声水平La/57.5 dBA则由调查确定。本研究提供了一个应用统计频率分析和逻辑回归模型的模板,以检验其他地方空调办公室的等效连续噪音水平Leq所表明的听觉环境的“最佳”标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A method of assessing the acceptability of noise levels in air-conditioned offices
This study examined the acceptable noise level in an office environment by interviewing 422 occupants about the aural environment being perceived in 61 air-conditioned offices in Hong Kong. The survey samples covered different types of building and prevalent mechanical air supply system. In particular, the measured equivalent continuous noise level Leq in the offices was chosen as an indicator and correlated with the subjective responses from occupants on a visual analogue assessment scale and a dichotomous assessment scale. The results showed that this acceptability was significantly influenced by the office noise level and it would be correlated with a logistic regression model. A satisfaction criterion of the noise level could be evaluated from the frequency distribution of the occupants’ response at certain Leq. In addition, the proposed satisfaction criterion of aural comfort in current design practice was confirmed by the survey samples: an indoor environment with an equivalent continuous noise level Leq of 57.5 dBA would be adopted as a design criterion for some offices. Practical application: The neutral criterion for aural comfort indicated by the equivalent continuous noise level Leq in air-conditioned offices was determined within the range of 45-70 dBA and the ‘optimum’ noise level La/57.5 dBA to be maintained in an office was determined from the survey. This study provides a template for applying a statistical frequency analysis and logistic regression model to examine the ‘optimum’ criteria for aural environment indicated by equivalent continuous noise level Leq in air-conditioned offices elsewhere.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real coded genetic algorithm in operational optimization of a district cooling system: An inceptive applicability assessment and power saving evaluation Producing domestic energy benchmarks using a large disaggregate stock model An indoor airflow distribution predictor using machine learning for a real-time healthy building monitoring system in the tropics Producing domestic energy benchmarks using a large disaggregate stock model An indoor airflow distribution predictor using machine learning for a real-time healthy building monitoring system in the tropics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1