分析和量化容错特性

S. Hellebrand
{"title":"分析和量化容错特性","authors":"S. Hellebrand","doi":"10.1109/LATW.2013.6562662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Nanoscale circuit and system design must cope with increasing parameter variations and a growing susceptibility to external noise. To avoid an overly pessimistic design and fully exploit the potential of new technologies, various strategies for “robust” design have been developed in the past few years. Examples range from classical fault tolerant architectures to innovative self-calibrating solutions. However, a robust design style makes validation and test particularly challenging. For design validation, it is no longer sufficient to analyze the functionality, but also robustness properties must be verified. Already the analysis of traditional fault tolerance properties like fault secureness can get very complex. In addition to that, the fault tolerance can vary with the circuit parameters, which makes the analysis extremely difficult. Similarly, manufacturing test has to provide information about the remaining robustness in the presence of manufacturing defects (“quality binning”), and yield estimation should be refined to different quality levels. In this talk we discuss the mentioned problems in more detail for some typical architectures and show first solutions.","PeriodicalId":186736,"journal":{"name":"2013 14th Latin American Test Workshop - LATW","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing and quantifying fault tolerance properties\",\"authors\":\"S. Hellebrand\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LATW.2013.6562662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. Nanoscale circuit and system design must cope with increasing parameter variations and a growing susceptibility to external noise. To avoid an overly pessimistic design and fully exploit the potential of new technologies, various strategies for “robust” design have been developed in the past few years. Examples range from classical fault tolerant architectures to innovative self-calibrating solutions. However, a robust design style makes validation and test particularly challenging. For design validation, it is no longer sufficient to analyze the functionality, but also robustness properties must be verified. Already the analysis of traditional fault tolerance properties like fault secureness can get very complex. In addition to that, the fault tolerance can vary with the circuit parameters, which makes the analysis extremely difficult. Similarly, manufacturing test has to provide information about the remaining robustness in the presence of manufacturing defects (“quality binning”), and yield estimation should be refined to different quality levels. In this talk we discuss the mentioned problems in more detail for some typical architectures and show first solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 14th Latin American Test Workshop - LATW\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 14th Latin American Test Workshop - LATW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LATW.2013.6562662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 14th Latin American Test Workshop - LATW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LATW.2013.6562662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只提供摘要形式。纳米级电路和系统设计必须应对不断增加的参数变化和对外部噪声的日益敏感。为了避免过度悲观的设计并充分利用新技术的潜力,在过去几年中已经开发了各种“健壮”设计策略。例子包括从经典的容错架构到创新的自校准解决方案。然而,健壮的设计风格使验证和测试特别具有挑战性。对于设计验证,仅仅分析功能是不够的,还必须验证鲁棒性。传统的容错特性(如故障安全性)的分析已经变得非常复杂。此外,容错性随电路参数的变化而变化,这使得分析变得非常困难。类似地,制造测试必须在存在制造缺陷的情况下提供关于剩余健壮性的信息(“质量分类”),并且产量估计应该细化到不同的质量水平。在这次演讲中,我们将更详细地讨论一些典型架构中提到的问题,并给出初步解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing and quantifying fault tolerance properties
Summary form only given. Nanoscale circuit and system design must cope with increasing parameter variations and a growing susceptibility to external noise. To avoid an overly pessimistic design and fully exploit the potential of new technologies, various strategies for “robust” design have been developed in the past few years. Examples range from classical fault tolerant architectures to innovative self-calibrating solutions. However, a robust design style makes validation and test particularly challenging. For design validation, it is no longer sufficient to analyze the functionality, but also robustness properties must be verified. Already the analysis of traditional fault tolerance properties like fault secureness can get very complex. In addition to that, the fault tolerance can vary with the circuit parameters, which makes the analysis extremely difficult. Similarly, manufacturing test has to provide information about the remaining robustness in the presence of manufacturing defects (“quality binning”), and yield estimation should be refined to different quality levels. In this talk we discuss the mentioned problems in more detail for some typical architectures and show first solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fast fault injection techniques using FPGAs Assessment of diagnostic test for automated bug localization Local data fusion algorithm for fire detection through mobile robot Vertically-stacked silicon nanowire transistors with controllable polarity: A robustness study Improving error detection with selective redundancy in software-based techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1