产品网络营销数据-信息知识获取评价本体中的真满意度重点研究用户满意度实现的语义机制方法

Hani K. M. Abd El-Salam
{"title":"产品网络营销数据-信息知识获取评价本体中的真满意度重点研究用户满意度实现的语义机制方法","authors":"Hani K. M. Abd El-Salam","doi":"10.1109/ICDIM.2018.8847045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extravagance of the product electronic channel media and/or digital data is no longer a (product-big-data) facet, where “True Satisfaction” understanding of an Electronic Marketing (e-M) (data-information-knowledge strategic-to-operational) management; is provoking and sharing the satisfaction multidimensional inter-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary, resources data, experience information, consequences knowledge implications of all participant actors in a product e-M satisfaction true process environment. The “True Satisfaction” logic argues; that operational qualitative information research facilitates and illustrates strategic quantitative data research, and quantitative research do the same route, where both approach shape the available User Satisfaction (US) functional data-information suitability and PS context strategic-to-operational completeness interoperability, in a accumulative e-M Environment (e-ME) knowledge ability, to shape an intentional logical satisfaction perspective knowledge. While the framework semantic; convoys that, “ e-M implementation methodology is; the satisfaction projection and projection inferences of, US qualitative strategic physiological requirements, upon the Product Satisfaction (PS) quantitative operational physiological requirements, for an entity investigation of theoretical, intentional perspective and philosophical satisfaction backgrounds.”. Consequentially, the implementation technology; utilizes both quantitative and qualitative satisfaction research approaches, where they are strategically alignment, convoyed with integrity development, and implemented consuming transformation logic evaluation; in parallel, with satisfaction web analytics; knowledge production, validation process and integration perspectives’; nonetheless, e-ME web analytics semantic mechanisms evaluation is obtainable in one methodology.","PeriodicalId":120884,"journal":{"name":"2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"True Satisfaction in Product e-Marketing Data-Information Knowledge Acquisition Evaluation Ontology; with focus on User Satisfaction Implementation Semantic Mechanism Methodology\",\"authors\":\"Hani K. M. Abd El-Salam\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDIM.2018.8847045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The extravagance of the product electronic channel media and/or digital data is no longer a (product-big-data) facet, where “True Satisfaction” understanding of an Electronic Marketing (e-M) (data-information-knowledge strategic-to-operational) management; is provoking and sharing the satisfaction multidimensional inter-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary, resources data, experience information, consequences knowledge implications of all participant actors in a product e-M satisfaction true process environment. The “True Satisfaction” logic argues; that operational qualitative information research facilitates and illustrates strategic quantitative data research, and quantitative research do the same route, where both approach shape the available User Satisfaction (US) functional data-information suitability and PS context strategic-to-operational completeness interoperability, in a accumulative e-M Environment (e-ME) knowledge ability, to shape an intentional logical satisfaction perspective knowledge. While the framework semantic; convoys that, “ e-M implementation methodology is; the satisfaction projection and projection inferences of, US qualitative strategic physiological requirements, upon the Product Satisfaction (PS) quantitative operational physiological requirements, for an entity investigation of theoretical, intentional perspective and philosophical satisfaction backgrounds.”. Consequentially, the implementation technology; utilizes both quantitative and qualitative satisfaction research approaches, where they are strategically alignment, convoyed with integrity development, and implemented consuming transformation logic evaluation; in parallel, with satisfaction web analytics; knowledge production, validation process and integration perspectives’; nonetheless, e-ME web analytics semantic mechanisms evaluation is obtainable in one methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2018.8847045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2018.8847045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奢侈的产品电子渠道媒体和/或数字数据不再是(产品大数据)的一个方面,其中“真正满意”的理解是电子营销(e-M)(数据-信息-知识战略-运营)管理;在产品e-M满意度真实过程环境中,激发和分享所有参与者的多维、跨学科和跨学科、资源数据、经验信息、结果知识含义的满意度。“真正的满足”逻辑认为;操作性定性信息研究促进并说明了战略性定量数据研究,定量研究走的是同样的路线,两种方法都在累积的e-M环境(e-ME)知识能力中塑造可用的用户满意度(US)功能数据-信息适用性和PS上下文战略-操作完整性互操作性,以塑造有意的逻辑满意度视角知识。而框架语义化;“e-M实施方法是;在产品满意度(PS)定量操作生理需求的基础上,美国定性战略生理需求的满意度投影和投影推论,用于理论、意图视角和哲学满意度背景的实体调查。相应的,实现技术;采用定量和定性的满意度研究方法,战略衔接,以完整性发展为载体,实施消费转型逻辑评价;与此同时,满意度网络分析;知识生产、验证过程和集成视角”;尽管如此,e-ME web分析语义机制评估是可以用一种方法获得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
True Satisfaction in Product e-Marketing Data-Information Knowledge Acquisition Evaluation Ontology; with focus on User Satisfaction Implementation Semantic Mechanism Methodology
The extravagance of the product electronic channel media and/or digital data is no longer a (product-big-data) facet, where “True Satisfaction” understanding of an Electronic Marketing (e-M) (data-information-knowledge strategic-to-operational) management; is provoking and sharing the satisfaction multidimensional inter-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary, resources data, experience information, consequences knowledge implications of all participant actors in a product e-M satisfaction true process environment. The “True Satisfaction” logic argues; that operational qualitative information research facilitates and illustrates strategic quantitative data research, and quantitative research do the same route, where both approach shape the available User Satisfaction (US) functional data-information suitability and PS context strategic-to-operational completeness interoperability, in a accumulative e-M Environment (e-ME) knowledge ability, to shape an intentional logical satisfaction perspective knowledge. While the framework semantic; convoys that, “ e-M implementation methodology is; the satisfaction projection and projection inferences of, US qualitative strategic physiological requirements, upon the Product Satisfaction (PS) quantitative operational physiological requirements, for an entity investigation of theoretical, intentional perspective and philosophical satisfaction backgrounds.”. Consequentially, the implementation technology; utilizes both quantitative and qualitative satisfaction research approaches, where they are strategically alignment, convoyed with integrity development, and implemented consuming transformation logic evaluation; in parallel, with satisfaction web analytics; knowledge production, validation process and integration perspectives’; nonetheless, e-ME web analytics semantic mechanisms evaluation is obtainable in one methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attention Based Neural Architecture for Rumor Detection with Author Context Awareness Urdu Text Classification: A comparative study using machine learning techniques The Effect of Different Type of Information on Trust in Facebook Page Towards scalable standards for web content usability Ontology Coverage Tool and Document Browser for Learning Material Exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1